Cargando…

Alternative prostate cancer grading systems incorporating percent pattern 4/5 (IQ-Gleason) and cribriform architecture (cGrade) improve prediction of outcome after radical prostatectomy

Percentage Gleason pattern 4, invasive cribriform and/or intraductal carcinoma (IC/IDC) and minor pattern 5 are recognized as independent parameters for prostate cancer outcome, but are not incorporated in current grade groups (GGs). Two proof-of-principle studies have proposed alternative grading s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Seyrek, Neslisah, Hollemans, Eva, Andrinopoulou, Eleni-Rosalina, Osanto, Susanne, Pelger, Rob C. M., van der Poel, Henk G., Bekers, Elise, Remmers, Sebastiaan, Schoots, Ivo G., van Leenders, Geert J. L. H.
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:	Original Article
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184433/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35157140 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00428-022-03301-y

Ejemplares similares

Cribriform architecture outperforms Gleason pattern 4 percentage and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 in predicting the outcome of Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients
por: Seyrek, Neslisah, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cribriform architecture in radical prostatectomies predicts oncological outcome in Gleason score 8 prostate cancer patients
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Inter-observer variability of cribriform architecture and percent Gleason pattern 4 in prostate cancer: relation to clinical outcome
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percentage Gleason pattern 4 and PI-RADS score predict upgrading in biopsy Grade Group 2 prostate cancer patients without cribriform pattern
por: van der Slot, Margaretha A., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Comedonecrosis Gleason pattern 5 is associated with worse clinical outcome in operated prostate cancer patients
por: Hansum, Tim, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Clinical outcome comparison of Grade Group 1 and Grade Group 2 prostate cancer with and without cribriform architecture at the time of radical prostatectomy
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prostate cancer growth patterns beyond the Gleason score: entering a new era of comprehensive tumour grading
por: van Leenders, Geert J L H, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Large cribriform growth pattern identifies ISUP grade 2 prostate cancer at high risk for recurrence and metastasis
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Concordance of cribriform architecture in matched prostate cancer biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens
por: Hollemans, Eva, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Automated detection of cribriform growth patterns in prostate histology images
por: Ambrosini, Pierre, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Prognostic Utility of the Gleason Grading System Revisions and Histopathological Factors Beyond Gleason Grade
por: Zelic, Renata, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

On cribriform prostate cancer
por: Kweldam, Charlotte F., et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Cribriform pattern does not have a significant impact in Gleason Score ≥7/ISUP Grade ≥2 prostate cancers submitted to radical prostatectomy
por: Flammia, Simone, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Gene-expression analysis of gleason grade 3 tumor glands embedded in low- and high-risk prostate cancer
por: Hoogland, A. Marije, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Low-grade Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma: A Review of the Literature and Case Report
por: Wakabayashi, Nao, et al.
Publicado: (2017)

Large and small cribriform architecture have similar adverse clinical outcome on prostate cancer biopsies
por: Rijstenberg, L Lucia, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Updating the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator with Invasive Cribriform and/or Intraductal Carcinoma for Men with a Prior Negative Biopsy
por: Remmers, Sebastiaan, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Narrative review of prostate cancer grading systems: will the Gleason scores be replaced by the Grade Groups?
por: Montironi, Rodolfo, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Artificial intelligence for diagnosis and Gleason grading of prostate cancer: the PANDA challenge
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Biochemical Recurrence in Gleason Score 7 Prostate Cancer in Korean Men: Significance of the Primary Gleason Grade
por: Ro, Yun Kwan, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

Low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of salivary glands: report of two cases and review of the literature
por: Wang, Liang, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Cribriform adenocarcinoma of minor salivary gland: A mimic of polymorphous low-grade adenocarcinoma
por: Madhura, MG, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Endoscopic trans-pterygoid resection of a low-grade cribriform cystadenocarcinoma of the infratemporal fossa
por: Ramjee, Vikram G., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Reporting Gleason grade/score in synoptic reports of radical prostatectomies
por: Renshaw, Andrew A., et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Androgen deprivation therapy and Gleason grade: unravelling implications on survival
por: Scott, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Artificial intelligence assistance significantly improves Gleason grading of prostate biopsies by pathologists
por: Bulten, Wouter, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Percent Gleason pattern 4 in stratifying the prognosis of patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer
por: Sharma, Meenal, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Are we ready to include invasive cribriform and intraductal carcinoma into the prostate cancer grade grouping system?
por: Xiao, Guang-Qian, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Correlation of concentrations of selected trace elements with Gleason grade of prostate tissues
por: Banas, A., et al.
Publicado: (2010)

Review by urological pathologists improves the accuracy of Gleason grading by general pathologists
por: Nakai, Yasushi, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Pelvic nodal radiotherapy in Gleason grade group 5 prostate cancer
por: Cook, Kiri, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Differences in survival of prostate cancer Gleason 8–10 disease and the establishment of a new Gleason survival grading system
por: Zhou, Yuan, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Distinct Adverse Clinical Outcomes of Small and Large Cribriform Patterns on Gleason 7 Prostate Cancer: A Preliminary Study
por: Kazan, Ozgur, et al.
Publicado: (2023)

Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Grading from Gleason to the New Grade-Group System: A Historical and Critical Review
por: Barakzai, Muhammad Abrar
Publicado: (2019)

Deep learning for automatic Gleason pattern classification for grade group determination of prostate biopsies
por: Lucas, Marit, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Fine-Needle Aspiration Cytology of Low-Grade Cribriform Cystadenocarcinoma with Many Psammoma Bodies of the Salivary Gland
por: Jeong, Ji Yun, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Automated Gleason grading of prostate cancer tissue microarrays via deep learning
por: Arvaniti, Eirini, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Predicting prostate cancer specific-mortality with artificial intelligence-based Gleason grading
por: Wulczyn, Ellery, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Association between Nuclear Morphometry Parameters and Gleason Grade in Patients with Prostatic Cancer
por: Malshy, Kamil, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Quantification of the individual risk of each Gleason pattern, including tertiary Gleason pattern 5, after radical prostatectomy: development of the modified Gleason grade grouping (mGGG) model
por: Taguchi, Satoru, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_sijiube8g6qbje8pidrabpkqjq