Cargando…

The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae

SUMMARY: Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) are both calculated on L1-L4 vertebrae. This study investigated the ability to predict osteoporotic fractures of BMD and TBS as calculated based on all possible adjacent L1-L4 vertebrae combinations. Present findings in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shevroja, Enisa, Mo Costabella, François, Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena, Lamy, Olivier, Hans, Didier
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer London 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01123-8
_version_ 1784724516550737920
author Shevroja, Enisa
Mo Costabella, François
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena
Lamy, Olivier
Hans, Didier
author_facet Shevroja, Enisa
Mo Costabella, François
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena
Lamy, Olivier
Hans, Didier
author_sort Shevroja, Enisa
collection PubMed
description SUMMARY: Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) are both calculated on L1-L4 vertebrae. This study investigated the ability to predict osteoporotic fractures of BMD and TBS as calculated based on all possible adjacent L1-L4 vertebrae combinations. Present findings indicate that L1-L3 is an optimal combination to calculate LS-BMD or TBS. INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spine (LS) BMD and TBS are both assessed in the LS DXA scans in the same region of interest, L1-L4. We aimed to investigate the ability to predict osteoporotic fractures of all the possible adjacent LS vertebrae combinations used to calculate BMD and TBS and to evaluate if any of these combinations performs better at osteoporotic fracture prediction than the traditional L1-L4 combination. METHODS: This study was embedded in OsteoLaus-women cohort in Switzerland. LS-DXA scans were performed using Discovery A System (Hologic). The incident vertebral fractures (VFs) and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were assessed from VF assessments using Genant’s method or questionnaires (non-VF MOF). We ran logistic models using TBS and BMD to predict MOF, VF, and non-VF MOF, combining different adjustment factors (age, fracture level, or BMD). RESULTS: One thousand six hundred thirty-two women (mean ± SD) 64.4 ± 7.5 years, BMI 25.9 ± 4.5 kg/m(2), were followed for 4.4 years and 133 experienced MOF. The association of one SD decrease L1-L3 BMD with the odds ratios (ORs) of MOF was OR 1.32 (95%CI 1.15–1.53), L2-L4 BMD was 1.25 (95%CI 1.09–1.42), and L1-L4 BMD was 1.30 (95%CI 1.14–1.48). One SD decrease in L1-L3 TBS was more strongly associated with the odds of having a MOF (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.34–2.00), than one SD decrease in L2-L4 TBS (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.21–1.81), or in L1-L4 TBS (OR 1.60, CI 95% 1.32–1.95). CONCLUSION: Current findings indicate that L1-L3 is an optimal combination for the TBS or LS-BMD calculation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-022-01123-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9184435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer London
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91844352022-06-11 The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae Shevroja, Enisa Mo Costabella, François Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena Lamy, Olivier Hans, Didier Arch Osteoporos Original Article SUMMARY: Lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular bone score (TBS) are both calculated on L1-L4 vertebrae. This study investigated the ability to predict osteoporotic fractures of BMD and TBS as calculated based on all possible adjacent L1-L4 vertebrae combinations. Present findings indicate that L1-L3 is an optimal combination to calculate LS-BMD or TBS. INTRODUCTION: Lumbar spine (LS) BMD and TBS are both assessed in the LS DXA scans in the same region of interest, L1-L4. We aimed to investigate the ability to predict osteoporotic fractures of all the possible adjacent LS vertebrae combinations used to calculate BMD and TBS and to evaluate if any of these combinations performs better at osteoporotic fracture prediction than the traditional L1-L4 combination. METHODS: This study was embedded in OsteoLaus-women cohort in Switzerland. LS-DXA scans were performed using Discovery A System (Hologic). The incident vertebral fractures (VFs) and major osteoporotic fractures (MOFs) were assessed from VF assessments using Genant’s method or questionnaires (non-VF MOF). We ran logistic models using TBS and BMD to predict MOF, VF, and non-VF MOF, combining different adjustment factors (age, fracture level, or BMD). RESULTS: One thousand six hundred thirty-two women (mean ± SD) 64.4 ± 7.5 years, BMI 25.9 ± 4.5 kg/m(2), were followed for 4.4 years and 133 experienced MOF. The association of one SD decrease L1-L3 BMD with the odds ratios (ORs) of MOF was OR 1.32 (95%CI 1.15–1.53), L2-L4 BMD was 1.25 (95%CI 1.09–1.42), and L1-L4 BMD was 1.30 (95%CI 1.14–1.48). One SD decrease in L1-L3 TBS was more strongly associated with the odds of having a MOF (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.34–2.00), than one SD decrease in L2-L4 TBS (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.21–1.81), or in L1-L4 TBS (OR 1.60, CI 95% 1.32–1.95). CONCLUSION: Current findings indicate that L1-L3 is an optimal combination for the TBS or LS-BMD calculation. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11657-022-01123-8. Springer London 2022-06-09 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9184435/ /pubmed/35678937 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01123-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Shevroja, Enisa
Mo Costabella, François
Gonzalez Rodriguez, Elena
Lamy, Olivier
Hans, Didier
The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title_full The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title_fullStr The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title_full_unstemmed The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title_short The fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine BMD and TBS as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
title_sort fracture predictive ability of lumbar spine bmd and tbs as calculated based on different combinations of the lumbar spine vertebrae
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35678937
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11657-022-01123-8
work_keys_str_mv AT shevrojaenisa thefracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT mocostabellafrancois thefracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT gonzalezrodriguezelena thefracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT lamyolivier thefracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT hansdidier thefracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT shevrojaenisa fracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT mocostabellafrancois fracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT gonzalezrodriguezelena fracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT lamyolivier fracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae
AT hansdidier fracturepredictiveabilityoflumbarspinebmdandtbsascalculatedbasedondifferentcombinationsofthelumbarspinevertebrae