Cargando…

Who are the real high-risk patients with pathological T2N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer that can benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in pathological T2N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is not clear. METHODS: One thousand and fifty pathological T2N0M0 NSCLC patients were included and divided into two groups: with and without ACT. A propensity score matching anal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hou, X., Yang, M.-Z., Li, J.-B., Tan, Z.-H., Long, H., Fu, J.-H., Zhang, L.-J., Lin, P., Yang, H.-X.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184557/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688064
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100508
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in pathological T2N0M0 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients is not clear. METHODS: One thousand and fifty pathological T2N0M0 NSCLC patients were included and divided into two groups: with and without ACT. A propensity score matching analysis was carried out to minimize selection bias. The significance of ACT in high-risk patients was further analyzed. The Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model were used to assess the impact of ACT on the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and cancer-specific survival. RESULTS: For the entire cohort, 31.9% (335/1050) of patients received ACT. After propensity score matching, 325 pairs of patients were matched. OS and DFS were comparable between groups in the original or matched cohort, which was confirmed by the multivariate analysis (all P > 0.05). In high-risk patients, the data suggest that ACT could improve OS and DFS only in patients with tumours >4 cm (OS: P = 0.003; DFS: P = 0.013). ACT could significantly improve the 5-year OS in patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (P = 0.022). ACT, however, could not improve cancer-specific survival in any subgroup, including patients with tumours >4 cm or wild-type EGFR (all P > 0.05). For patients with other high-risk factors, ACT failed to benefit patients in long-term outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In resected pT2N0M0 NSCLC patients, those with tumours >4 cm and wild-type EGFR are real high-risk patients and could gain survival benefit from ACT. Further prospective study is needed to confirm the definition.