Cargando…

Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia

We tested the hypothesis that a temporary period of circadian arrhythmia would transiently impair recall of an aversive memory in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Unlike mice or rats, circadian arrhythmia is easily induced in this species by a one-time manipulation of their ambient lighting [i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steiger, Athreya, Farfan, Julia, Fisher, Nathan, Heller, H. Craig, Fernandez, Fabian-Xosé, Ruby, Norman F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.900620
_version_ 1784724595749683200
author Steiger, Athreya
Farfan, Julia
Fisher, Nathan
Heller, H. Craig
Fernandez, Fabian-Xosé
Ruby, Norman F.
author_facet Steiger, Athreya
Farfan, Julia
Fisher, Nathan
Heller, H. Craig
Fernandez, Fabian-Xosé
Ruby, Norman F.
author_sort Steiger, Athreya
collection PubMed
description We tested the hypothesis that a temporary period of circadian arrhythmia would transiently impair recall of an aversive memory in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Unlike mice or rats, circadian arrhythmia is easily induced in this species by a one-time manipulation of their ambient lighting [i.e., the disruptive phase shift (DPS) protocol]. Hamsters were conditioned to associate footshocks with a shock chamber (context) and with a predictive auditory tone (cue), and then exposed to the DPS protocol. Following DPS, animals either became arrhythmic (ARR), reentrained to the light-dark cycle (ENT), or became arrhythmic for < 14 days before their circadian locomotor rhythms spontaneously recovered and reentrained (ARR-ENT). Tests for contextual memory showed that freezing was decreased 9–10 days post-DPS when both ARR and ARR-ENT groups were arrhythmic. Once ARR-ENT animals reentrained (day 41), however, freezing was elevated back to Pre-DPS levels and did not differ from those observed in ENT hamsters. ENT animals maintained high levels of freezing at both time points, whereas, freezing remained low in ARR hamsters. In contrast to contextual responses, cued responses were unaffected by circadian arrhythmia; all three groups exhibited elevated levels of freezing in response to the tones. The differential impact of circadian arrhythmia on contextual versus cued associative memory suggests that arrhythmia preferentially impacts memory processes that depend on the hippocampus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9184752
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91847522022-06-11 Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia Steiger, Athreya Farfan, Julia Fisher, Nathan Heller, H. Craig Fernandez, Fabian-Xosé Ruby, Norman F. Front Integr Neurosci Neuroscience We tested the hypothesis that a temporary period of circadian arrhythmia would transiently impair recall of an aversive memory in Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus). Unlike mice or rats, circadian arrhythmia is easily induced in this species by a one-time manipulation of their ambient lighting [i.e., the disruptive phase shift (DPS) protocol]. Hamsters were conditioned to associate footshocks with a shock chamber (context) and with a predictive auditory tone (cue), and then exposed to the DPS protocol. Following DPS, animals either became arrhythmic (ARR), reentrained to the light-dark cycle (ENT), or became arrhythmic for < 14 days before their circadian locomotor rhythms spontaneously recovered and reentrained (ARR-ENT). Tests for contextual memory showed that freezing was decreased 9–10 days post-DPS when both ARR and ARR-ENT groups were arrhythmic. Once ARR-ENT animals reentrained (day 41), however, freezing was elevated back to Pre-DPS levels and did not differ from those observed in ENT hamsters. ENT animals maintained high levels of freezing at both time points, whereas, freezing remained low in ARR hamsters. In contrast to contextual responses, cued responses were unaffected by circadian arrhythmia; all three groups exhibited elevated levels of freezing in response to the tones. The differential impact of circadian arrhythmia on contextual versus cued associative memory suggests that arrhythmia preferentially impacts memory processes that depend on the hippocampus. Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-27 /pmc/articles/PMC9184752/ /pubmed/35694186 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.900620 Text en Copyright © 2022 Steiger, Farfan, Fisher, Heller, Fernandez and Ruby. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Steiger, Athreya
Farfan, Julia
Fisher, Nathan
Heller, H. Craig
Fernandez, Fabian-Xosé
Ruby, Norman F.
Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title_full Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title_fullStr Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title_full_unstemmed Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title_short Reversible Suppression of Fear Memory Recall by Transient Circadian Arrhythmia
title_sort reversible suppression of fear memory recall by transient circadian arrhythmia
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184752/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35694186
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.900620
work_keys_str_mv AT steigerathreya reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia
AT farfanjulia reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia
AT fishernathan reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia
AT hellerhcraig reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia
AT fernandezfabianxose reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia
AT rubynormanf reversiblesuppressionoffearmemoryrecallbytransientcircadianarrhythmia