Cargando…

Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach

Treatment response assessment by imaging plays a vital role in evaluating changes in solid tumors during oncology therapeutic clinical trials. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is the reference standard imaging response criteria and provides details regarding image acquisitio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ruchalski, Kathleen, Dewan, Rohit, Sai, Victor, McIntosh, Lacey J., Braschi-Amirfarzan, Marta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100426
_version_ 1784724620950110208
author Ruchalski, Kathleen
Dewan, Rohit
Sai, Victor
McIntosh, Lacey J.
Braschi-Amirfarzan, Marta
author_facet Ruchalski, Kathleen
Dewan, Rohit
Sai, Victor
McIntosh, Lacey J.
Braschi-Amirfarzan, Marta
author_sort Ruchalski, Kathleen
collection PubMed
description Treatment response assessment by imaging plays a vital role in evaluating changes in solid tumors during oncology therapeutic clinical trials. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is the reference standard imaging response criteria and provides details regarding image acquisition, image interpretation and categorical response classification. While RECIST 1.1 is applied for the majority of clinical trials in solid tumors, other criteria and modifications have been introduced when RECIST 1.1 outcomes may be incomplete. Available criteria beyond RECIST 1.1 can be explored in an algorithmic fashion dependent on imaging modality, tumor type and method of treatment. Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is available for use with PET/CT. Modifications to RECIST 1.1 can be tumor specific, including mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma and mesothelioma. Choi criteria for gastrointestinal stromal tumors incorporate tumor density with alterations to categorical response thresholds. Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) imaging criteria combine RECIST 1.1 findings with those of bone scans. In addition, multiple response criteria have been created to address atypical imaging responses in immunotherapy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9184854
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91848542022-06-11 Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach Ruchalski, Kathleen Dewan, Rohit Sai, Victor McIntosh, Lacey J. Braschi-Amirfarzan, Marta Eur J Radiol Open Article Treatment response assessment by imaging plays a vital role in evaluating changes in solid tumors during oncology therapeutic clinical trials. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 is the reference standard imaging response criteria and provides details regarding image acquisition, image interpretation and categorical response classification. While RECIST 1.1 is applied for the majority of clinical trials in solid tumors, other criteria and modifications have been introduced when RECIST 1.1 outcomes may be incomplete. Available criteria beyond RECIST 1.1 can be explored in an algorithmic fashion dependent on imaging modality, tumor type and method of treatment. Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST) is available for use with PET/CT. Modifications to RECIST 1.1 can be tumor specific, including mRECIST for hepatocellular carcinoma and mesothelioma. Choi criteria for gastrointestinal stromal tumors incorporate tumor density with alterations to categorical response thresholds. Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 (PCWG3) imaging criteria combine RECIST 1.1 findings with those of bone scans. In addition, multiple response criteria have been created to address atypical imaging responses in immunotherapy. Elsevier 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9184854/ /pubmed/35693043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100426 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ruchalski, Kathleen
Dewan, Rohit
Sai, Victor
McIntosh, Lacey J.
Braschi-Amirfarzan, Marta
Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title_full Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title_fullStr Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title_full_unstemmed Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title_short Imaging response assessment for oncology: An algorithmic approach
title_sort imaging response assessment for oncology: an algorithmic approach
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9184854/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693043
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejro.2022.100426
work_keys_str_mv AT ruchalskikathleen imagingresponseassessmentforoncologyanalgorithmicapproach
AT dewanrohit imagingresponseassessmentforoncologyanalgorithmicapproach
AT saivictor imagingresponseassessmentforoncologyanalgorithmicapproach
AT mcintoshlaceyj imagingresponseassessmentforoncologyanalgorithmicapproach
AT braschiamirfarzanmarta imagingresponseassessmentforoncologyanalgorithmicapproach