Cargando…

Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale

BACKGROUND: The successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment, including physiotherapy and exercise therapy, can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, face-to-face appointments are curr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agnew, Jonathon M R, Nugent, Chris, Hanratty, Catherine E, Martin, Elizabeth, Kerr, Daniel P, McVeigh, Joseph G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617008
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34339
_version_ 1784724698299367424
author Agnew, Jonathon M R
Nugent, Chris
Hanratty, Catherine E
Martin, Elizabeth
Kerr, Daniel P
McVeigh, Joseph G
author_facet Agnew, Jonathon M R
Nugent, Chris
Hanratty, Catherine E
Martin, Elizabeth
Kerr, Daniel P
McVeigh, Joseph G
author_sort Agnew, Jonathon M R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment, including physiotherapy and exercise therapy, can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, face-to-face appointments are currently not feasible. New mobile technologies, such as mobile health technologies in the form of an app for smartphones, can be a solution to this problem. In many cases, these apps are not backed by scientific literature. Therefore, it is important that they are reviewed and quality assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of apps related to shoulder pain by using the Mobile App Rating Scale. METHODS: This study included 25 free and paid apps—8 from the Apple Store and 17 from the Google Play Store. A total of 5 reviewers were involved in the evaluation process. A descriptive analysis of the Mobile App Rating Scale results provided a general overview of the quality of the apps. RESULTS: Overall, app quality was generally low, with an average star rating of 1.97 out of 5. The best scores were in the “Functionality” and “Aesthetics” sections, and apps were scored poorer in the “Engagement” and “Information” sections. The apps were also rated poorly in the “Subjective Quality” section. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the apps were well built technically and were aesthetically pleasing. However, the apps failed to provide quality information to users, which resulted in a lack of engagement. Most of the apps were not backed by scientific literature (24/25, 96%), and those that contained scientific references were vastly out-of-date. Future apps would need to address these concerns while taking simple measures to ensure quality control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9185331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91853312022-06-11 Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale Agnew, Jonathon M R Nugent, Chris Hanratty, Catherine E Martin, Elizabeth Kerr, Daniel P McVeigh, Joseph G JMIR Form Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: The successful rehabilitation of musculoskeletal pain requires more than medical input alone. Conservative treatment, including physiotherapy and exercise therapy, can be an effective way of decreasing pain associated with musculoskeletal pain. However, face-to-face appointments are currently not feasible. New mobile technologies, such as mobile health technologies in the form of an app for smartphones, can be a solution to this problem. In many cases, these apps are not backed by scientific literature. Therefore, it is important that they are reviewed and quality assessed. OBJECTIVE: The aim is to evaluate and measure the quality of apps related to shoulder pain by using the Mobile App Rating Scale. METHODS: This study included 25 free and paid apps—8 from the Apple Store and 17 from the Google Play Store. A total of 5 reviewers were involved in the evaluation process. A descriptive analysis of the Mobile App Rating Scale results provided a general overview of the quality of the apps. RESULTS: Overall, app quality was generally low, with an average star rating of 1.97 out of 5. The best scores were in the “Functionality” and “Aesthetics” sections, and apps were scored poorer in the “Engagement” and “Information” sections. The apps were also rated poorly in the “Subjective Quality” section. CONCLUSIONS: In general, the apps were well built technically and were aesthetically pleasing. However, the apps failed to provide quality information to users, which resulted in a lack of engagement. Most of the apps were not backed by scientific literature (24/25, 96%), and those that contained scientific references were vastly out-of-date. Future apps would need to address these concerns while taking simple measures to ensure quality control. JMIR Publications 2022-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9185331/ /pubmed/35617008 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34339 Text en ©Jonathon M R Agnew, Chris Nugent, Catherine E Hanratty, Elizabeth Martin, Daniel P Kerr, Joseph G McVeigh. Originally published in JMIR Formative Research (https://formative.jmir.org), 26.05.2022. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Agnew, Jonathon M R
Nugent, Chris
Hanratty, Catherine E
Martin, Elizabeth
Kerr, Daniel P
McVeigh, Joseph G
Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_full Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_fullStr Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_full_unstemmed Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_short Rating the Quality of Smartphone Apps Related to Shoulder Pain: Systematic Search and Evaluation Using the Mobile App Rating Scale
title_sort rating the quality of smartphone apps related to shoulder pain: systematic search and evaluation using the mobile app rating scale
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185331/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35617008
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/34339
work_keys_str_mv AT agnewjonathonmr ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT nugentchris ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT hanrattycatherinee ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT martinelizabeth ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT kerrdanielp ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale
AT mcveighjosephg ratingthequalityofsmartphoneappsrelatedtoshoulderpainsystematicsearchandevaluationusingthemobileappratingscale