Cargando…

Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND: Comorbid depression is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Depression is commonly untreated or undertreated, thus, there is a need for effective and safe interventions and current guidelines recommend psychological and pharmaceutical interventions for people with MS. Howeve...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyons, Julia, Campese, Stephanie, Learmonth, Yvonne C, Metse, Alexandra, Kermode, Allan G, Karahalios, Amalia, Marck, Claudia H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055796
_version_ 1784724718777008128
author Lyons, Julia
Campese, Stephanie
Learmonth, Yvonne C
Metse, Alexandra
Kermode, Allan G
Karahalios, Amalia
Marck, Claudia H
author_facet Lyons, Julia
Campese, Stephanie
Learmonth, Yvonne C
Metse, Alexandra
Kermode, Allan G
Karahalios, Amalia
Marck, Claudia H
author_sort Lyons, Julia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Comorbid depression is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Depression is commonly untreated or undertreated, thus, there is a need for effective and safe interventions and current guidelines recommend psychological and pharmaceutical interventions for people with MS. However, research suggests that other interventions, such as exercise, could also be effective. The comparative efficacy and safety of intervention modalities have not been quantified. We plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of psychological, pharmaceutical, physical and magnetic stimulation interventions for depression in people with MS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro from inception to 31 December 2021. Search terms will stem from three concepts: MS, depression and randomised controlled trials. Included studies will be randomised controlled trials, where participants are people with MS randomised to receive one of the aforementioned intervention types, and depression or depressive symptoms is the primary outcome, only outcome or secondary outcome with an a priori power calculation. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (using the Risk of Bias 2 tool) will be conducted independently by two reviewers. If possible, we will synthesise the evidence by fitting a frequentist network meta-analysis model with multivariate random effects, or a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis model. For each model, efficacy will be measured using a standardised mean difference, and safety using an OR. We plan to provide summary measures including forest plots, a geometry of the network, surface under the cumulative ranking curve, and a league table, and perform subgroup analyses. Otherwise, a narrative review will be provided. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics is not required for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Results will be published in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020209803.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9185417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91854172022-06-16 Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol Lyons, Julia Campese, Stephanie Learmonth, Yvonne C Metse, Alexandra Kermode, Allan G Karahalios, Amalia Marck, Claudia H BMJ Open Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Comorbid depression is prevalent in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Depression is commonly untreated or undertreated, thus, there is a need for effective and safe interventions and current guidelines recommend psychological and pharmaceutical interventions for people with MS. However, research suggests that other interventions, such as exercise, could also be effective. The comparative efficacy and safety of intervention modalities have not been quantified. We plan to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to compare efficacy and safety of psychological, pharmaceutical, physical and magnetic stimulation interventions for depression in people with MS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will search EMBASE, Medline, Cochrane CENTRAL, APA PsycINFO, Web of Science, CINAHL and PEDro from inception to 31 December 2021. Search terms will stem from three concepts: MS, depression and randomised controlled trials. Included studies will be randomised controlled trials, where participants are people with MS randomised to receive one of the aforementioned intervention types, and depression or depressive symptoms is the primary outcome, only outcome or secondary outcome with an a priori power calculation. Screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment (using the Risk of Bias 2 tool) will be conducted independently by two reviewers. If possible, we will synthesise the evidence by fitting a frequentist network meta-analysis model with multivariate random effects, or a pairwise random-effects meta-analysis model. For each model, efficacy will be measured using a standardised mean difference, and safety using an OR. We plan to provide summary measures including forest plots, a geometry of the network, surface under the cumulative ranking curve, and a league table, and perform subgroup analyses. Otherwise, a narrative review will be provided. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics is not required for a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Results will be published in a peer reviewed journal. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020209803. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9185417/ /pubmed/35680262 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055796 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Lyons, Julia
Campese, Stephanie
Learmonth, Yvonne C
Metse, Alexandra
Kermode, Allan G
Karahalios, Amalia
Marck, Claudia H
Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_full Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_fullStr Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_full_unstemmed Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_short Comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
title_sort comparing the effectiveness, safety and tolerability of interventions for depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis protocol
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35680262
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055796
work_keys_str_mv AT lyonsjulia comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT campesestephanie comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT learmonthyvonnec comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT metsealexandra comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT kermodeallang comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT karahaliosamalia comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol
AT marckclaudiah comparingtheeffectivenesssafetyandtolerabilityofinterventionsfordepressivesymptomsinpeoplewithmultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisprotocol