Cargando…

A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described and recorded abnormal root morphology; however, most of these studies were based on two-dimensional periapical or panoramic radiographs, and only a few studies have quantified it. We aimed to combine two-dimensional periapical radiographs and three-dimensi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Jian, Xu, Xiao, Wang, Xian-E., Jia, Peng-Cheng, Pan, Meng-Qiao, Xu, Li
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02258-3
_version_ 1784724815747219456
author Liu, Jian
Xu, Xiao
Wang, Xian-E.
Jia, Peng-Cheng
Pan, Meng-Qiao
Xu, Li
author_facet Liu, Jian
Xu, Xiao
Wang, Xian-E.
Jia, Peng-Cheng
Pan, Meng-Qiao
Xu, Li
author_sort Liu, Jian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described and recorded abnormal root morphology; however, most of these studies were based on two-dimensional periapical or panoramic radiographs, and only a few studies have quantified it. We aimed to combine two-dimensional periapical radiographs and three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to conduct qualitative judgments and quantitative analyses of normal and conical roots, and explore the clinical diagnostic method of normal and conical roots based on intraoral radiographs and CBCT. METHODS: The conical root was identified visually on periapical radiographs as the clinical gold standard. All teeth were divided into the cone-rooted teeth (CRT) or normal-rooted teeth (NRT) groups. Furthermore, differences in root length (RL), root surface area (RSA), and root volume (RV) of conical and normal roots in the maxillary premolars on CBCT were compared. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) and cut-off values were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of RV, RSA, RV/RL, and RSA/RL. RESULTS: The RSAs of NRT and CRT were 236.88 ± 27.93 mm(2) and 207.98 ± 27.80 mm(2), respectively (P = 0.000). The mean RV in the CRT group was lower than that in the NRT group, and the difference was statistically significant (253.40 ± 41.98 mm(3) vs. 316.93 ± 49.89 mm(3), P = 0.000). The RSA and RV of conical roots in single root premolars were 12.29% and 19.33% less than those of normal roots, respectively. The AUC values of RSA/RL and RV/RL were 0.87 and 0.89, respectively, and the best cut-off values were 19.61 for RSA/RL (if RSA/RL was < 19.61, the teeth were considered CRT) and 24.05 for RV/RL (if RV/RL was < 24.05, the teeth were considered CRT). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT has significant diagnostic value in the clinical evaluation of conical roots. RSA/RL and RV/RL were the best parameters with the largest AUC and high sensitivity and specificity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9185879
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91858792022-06-11 A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography Liu, Jian Xu, Xiao Wang, Xian-E. Jia, Peng-Cheng Pan, Meng-Qiao Xu, Li BMC Oral Health Research BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described and recorded abnormal root morphology; however, most of these studies were based on two-dimensional periapical or panoramic radiographs, and only a few studies have quantified it. We aimed to combine two-dimensional periapical radiographs and three-dimensional cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) to conduct qualitative judgments and quantitative analyses of normal and conical roots, and explore the clinical diagnostic method of normal and conical roots based on intraoral radiographs and CBCT. METHODS: The conical root was identified visually on periapical radiographs as the clinical gold standard. All teeth were divided into the cone-rooted teeth (CRT) or normal-rooted teeth (NRT) groups. Furthermore, differences in root length (RL), root surface area (RSA), and root volume (RV) of conical and normal roots in the maxillary premolars on CBCT were compared. Receiver operator characteristic curves were generated, and the area under the curve (AUC) and cut-off values were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic value of RV, RSA, RV/RL, and RSA/RL. RESULTS: The RSAs of NRT and CRT were 236.88 ± 27.93 mm(2) and 207.98 ± 27.80 mm(2), respectively (P = 0.000). The mean RV in the CRT group was lower than that in the NRT group, and the difference was statistically significant (253.40 ± 41.98 mm(3) vs. 316.93 ± 49.89 mm(3), P = 0.000). The RSA and RV of conical roots in single root premolars were 12.29% and 19.33% less than those of normal roots, respectively. The AUC values of RSA/RL and RV/RL were 0.87 and 0.89, respectively, and the best cut-off values were 19.61 for RSA/RL (if RSA/RL was < 19.61, the teeth were considered CRT) and 24.05 for RV/RL (if RV/RL was < 24.05, the teeth were considered CRT). CONCLUSIONS: CBCT has significant diagnostic value in the clinical evaluation of conical roots. RSA/RL and RV/RL were the best parameters with the largest AUC and high sensitivity and specificity. BioMed Central 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9185879/ /pubmed/35681195 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02258-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Liu, Jian
Xu, Xiao
Wang, Xian-E.
Jia, Peng-Cheng
Pan, Meng-Qiao
Xu, Li
A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title_full A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title_fullStr A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title_short A novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
title_sort novel three-dimensional quantitative assessment method for abnormal root morphology of the maxillary premolars in vivo on cone-beam computed tomography
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9185879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35681195
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12903-022-02258-3
work_keys_str_mv AT liujian anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT xuxiao anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT wangxiane anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT jiapengcheng anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT panmengqiao anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT xuli anovelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT liujian novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT xuxiao novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT wangxiane novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT jiapengcheng novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT panmengqiao novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography
AT xuli novelthreedimensionalquantitativeassessmentmethodforabnormalrootmorphologyofthemaxillarypremolarsinvivoonconebeamcomputedtomography