An Online Tool Using Basal or Activated Ovarian Reserve Markers to Predict the Number of Oocytes Retrieved Following Controlled Ovarian Stimulation: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND: Predicting the number of oocytes retrieved (NOR) following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) is the only way to ensure effective and safe treatment in assisted reproductive technology (ART). To date, there have been limited studies about predicting specific NOR, which hinders the development of individualized treatment in ART. OBJECTIVE: To establish an online tool for predicting NOR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In total, 621 prospective routine gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist COS cycles were studied. Independent variables included age, body mass index, antral follicle counts, basal FSH, basal and increment of anti-mullerian hormone, Luteinizing hormon, estradiol, testosterone, androstenedione, and inhibin B. The outcome variable was NOR. The independent variables underwent appropriate transformation to achieve a better fit for a linear relationship with NOR. Pruned forward selection with holdback validation was then used to establish predictive models. Corrected Akaike’s information criterion, Schwarz–Bayesian information criterion, scaled –log[likelihood], and the generalized coefficient of determination (R (2)) were used for model evaluation. RESULTS: A multiple negative binomial regression model was used for predicting NOR because it fitted a negative binomial distribution. We established Model 1, using basal ovarian reserve markers, and Model 2, using both basal and early dynamic markers for predicting NOR following COS. The generalized R (2) values were 0.54 and 0.51 for Model 1 and 0.64 and 0.62 for Model 2 in the training and validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSION: Models 1 and 2 could be applied to different scenarios. For directing the starting dose of recombinant follicle stimulation hormone (rFSH), Model 1 using basic predictors could be used prior to COS. Model 2 could be used for directing the adjustment of rFSH dosages during COS. An online tool (http://121.43.113.123:8002/) based on these two models is also developed. We anticipate that the clinical application of this tool could help the ART clinics to reduce iatrogenic ovarian under- or over-responses, and could reduce costs during COS for ART.