Cargando…

Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions

BACKGROUND: Ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB) with a 3.0-mm outer diameter and a 1.7-mm working channel currently appeared as a potential tool for better biopsy and diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) by accessing more distal bronchus. However, published research is primarily limited to diag...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feng, Xintong, Zhang, Qin, Luo, Fengming, Zhang, Xiaoju, Zhang, Lei, Xie, Fangfang, Sun, Jiayuan, Li, Shiyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693609
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-20
_version_ 1784724889146490880
author Feng, Xintong
Zhang, Qin
Luo, Fengming
Zhang, Xiaoju
Zhang, Lei
Xie, Fangfang
Sun, Jiayuan
Li, Shiyue
author_facet Feng, Xintong
Zhang, Qin
Luo, Fengming
Zhang, Xiaoju
Zhang, Lei
Xie, Fangfang
Sun, Jiayuan
Li, Shiyue
author_sort Feng, Xintong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB) with a 3.0-mm outer diameter and a 1.7-mm working channel currently appeared as a potential tool for better biopsy and diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) by accessing more distal bronchus. However, published research is primarily limited to diagnosis value of UTB for PPLs with fluoroscopy, the value of UTB compared with thin bronchoscope (TB) without fluoroscopy guidance has not been determined yet. METHODS: We design a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferior, multicenter study aiming to evaluate the diagnostic value and safety of UTB for PPLs with the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) combined with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) without fluoroscopy by comparing to TB. The study aims to enroll 578 patients presenting for evaluation of PPLs at five clinical sites in China. Subjects will be randomized to UTB-VBN-EBUS group, TB-VBN-EBUS-guide sheath (GS) group, and TB-VBN-EBUS-non-GS group. Primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield of PPLs. The total examination time, duration of finding lesions, the proportion of lesions visible by radial EBUS, factors affecting the diagnostic yield, difference in the bronchus level reached with the bronchoscope, difference in diagnostic yield, and complication rate will be determined as secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint will be followed-up at least 6-month post-procedure and 1-month post-procedure for safety endpoint. DISCUSSION: Study enrollment began in March 2021. Our preliminary experience reveals that UTB is a powerful tool in the diagnosis of PPLs even without fluoroscopy. The results of the current study will compensate the limitations of the previous research, further provide evidence of UTB in diagnosing PPLs without fluoroscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04571476. Registered on 30 September 2020.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9186243
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91862432022-06-11 Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions Feng, Xintong Zhang, Qin Luo, Fengming Zhang, Xiaoju Zhang, Lei Xie, Fangfang Sun, Jiayuan Li, Shiyue J Thorac Dis Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Ultrathin bronchoscope (UTB) with a 3.0-mm outer diameter and a 1.7-mm working channel currently appeared as a potential tool for better biopsy and diagnosis of peripheral pulmonary lesions (PPLs) by accessing more distal bronchus. However, published research is primarily limited to diagnosis value of UTB for PPLs with fluoroscopy, the value of UTB compared with thin bronchoscope (TB) without fluoroscopy guidance has not been determined yet. METHODS: We design a prospective, randomized, controlled, non-inferior, multicenter study aiming to evaluate the diagnostic value and safety of UTB for PPLs with the guidance of virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN) combined with endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) without fluoroscopy by comparing to TB. The study aims to enroll 578 patients presenting for evaluation of PPLs at five clinical sites in China. Subjects will be randomized to UTB-VBN-EBUS group, TB-VBN-EBUS-guide sheath (GS) group, and TB-VBN-EBUS-non-GS group. Primary endpoint is the diagnostic yield of PPLs. The total examination time, duration of finding lesions, the proportion of lesions visible by radial EBUS, factors affecting the diagnostic yield, difference in the bronchus level reached with the bronchoscope, difference in diagnostic yield, and complication rate will be determined as secondary endpoints. The primary endpoint will be followed-up at least 6-month post-procedure and 1-month post-procedure for safety endpoint. DISCUSSION: Study enrollment began in March 2021. Our preliminary experience reveals that UTB is a powerful tool in the diagnosis of PPLs even without fluoroscopy. The results of the current study will compensate the limitations of the previous research, further provide evidence of UTB in diagnosing PPLs without fluoroscopy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04571476. Registered on 30 September 2020. AME Publishing Company 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9186243/ /pubmed/35693609 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-20 Text en 2022 Journal of Thoracic Disease. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Feng, Xintong
Zhang, Qin
Luo, Fengming
Zhang, Xiaoju
Zhang, Lei
Xie, Fangfang
Sun, Jiayuan
Li, Shiyue
Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title_full Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title_fullStr Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title_full_unstemmed Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title_short Study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
title_sort study design for a multicenter, randomized controlled trial evaluating the diagnostic value of ultrathin bronchoscope compared to thin bronchoscope without fluoroscopy for peripheral pulmonary lesions
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186243/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35693609
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/jtd-22-20
work_keys_str_mv AT fengxintong studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT zhangqin studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT luofengming studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT zhangxiaoju studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT zhanglei studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT xiefangfang studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT sunjiayuan studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions
AT lishiyue studydesignforamulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialevaluatingthediagnosticvalueofultrathinbronchoscopecomparedtothinbronchoscopewithoutfluoroscopyforperipheralpulmonarylesions