Cargando…

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on the Workload of Diagnostic Radiology: A 2-Year Observational Study in a Tertiary Referral Hospital

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic imaging workload in a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiological examinations performed in pre-pandemic period (2015-2019) and in pandemic period (2020-2021) were retrospectively included. Based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rizzetto, Francesco, Gnocchi, Giulia, Travaglini, Francesca, Di Rocco, Gabriella, Rizzo, Aldo, Carbonaro, Luca Alessandro, Vanzulli, Angelo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9186449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35781400
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.002
Descripción
Sumario:RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on diagnostic imaging workload in a tertiary referral hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Radiological examinations performed in pre-pandemic period (2015-2019) and in pandemic period (2020-2021) were retrospectively included. Based on epidemiological data and restriction measures, four pandemic waves were identified. For each of them, the relative change (RC) in workload was calculated and compared to the 5-year averaged workload in the corresponding pre-COVID-19 periods. Workload variations were also assessed according to technique (radiographs, CT, MRI, ultrasounds), body district (chest, abdomen, breast, musculoskeletal, head/neck, brain/spine, cardiovascular) and care setting (inpatient, outpatient, emergency imaging, pre-admission imaging). RESULTS: A total of 1384380 examinations were included. In 2020 imaging workload decreased (RC = -11%) compared to the average of the previous 5 years, while in 2021 only a minimal variation (RC = +1%) was observed. During first wave, workload was reduced for all modalities, body regions and types of care setting (RC from -86% to -10%), except for CT (RC = +3%). In subsequent waves, workload increased only for CT (mean RC = +18%) and, regarding body districts, for breast (mean RC = +23%) and cardiovascular imaging (mean RC = +23%). For all other categories, a workload comparable to pre-pandemic period was almost only restored in the fourth wave. In all pandemics periods workload decrease was mainly due to reduced outpatient activity (p < 0.001), while inpatient and emergency imaging was increased (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Evaluating imaging workload changes throughout COVID-19 pandemic helps to understand the response dynamics of radiological services and to improve institutional preparedness to face extreme contingency.