Cargando…

Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction

METHODS: Consecutive women scheduled for nipple/skin-sparing/skin-reducing mastectomy between May 2020 and April 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into Group 1 in the absence of superficial and full-thickness necrosis (SN; FTN) and Group 2 in the presence of both. T1 (time betw...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mastronardi, Manuela, Fracon, Stefano, Scomersi, Serena, Fezzi, Margherita, Bortul, Marina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5142100
_version_ 1784725132990742528
author Mastronardi, Manuela
Fracon, Stefano
Scomersi, Serena
Fezzi, Margherita
Bortul, Marina
author_facet Mastronardi, Manuela
Fracon, Stefano
Scomersi, Serena
Fezzi, Margherita
Bortul, Marina
author_sort Mastronardi, Manuela
collection PubMed
description METHODS: Consecutive women scheduled for nipple/skin-sparing/skin-reducing mastectomy between May 2020 and April 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into Group 1 in the absence of superficial and full-thickness necrosis (SN; FTN) and Group 2 in the presence of both. T1 (time between ICG injection and the initial perfusion of the least perfused MSF area), ICG-Q1, and ICG-Q% (absolute and relative perfusion values of the least vascularized area) were collected. RESULTS: 38 breasts were considered. FTN was reported in 4 breasts (10.5%) and SN in 3 (7.9%). The two groups statistically differ in T1 (Group2 > Group1) and ICG-Q% (Group1 > Group2) (p < 0.05). T1 could statistically predict ICG-Q1 and ICG-Q%. Both quantitative values have a sensitivity of 57% and a NPV of 89%; ICG-Q% shows higher specificity (81% vs 77%) and PPV (40% vs 36%). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative ICG angiography may additionally reduce MSF necrosis. Moreover, longer T1 may indicate possible postoperative necrosis. Considering these factors, intraoperative changes of reconstructive strategy could be adopted to reduce reconstructive failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9187268
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91872682022-06-15 Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction Mastronardi, Manuela Fracon, Stefano Scomersi, Serena Fezzi, Margherita Bortul, Marina Breast J Research Article METHODS: Consecutive women scheduled for nipple/skin-sparing/skin-reducing mastectomy between May 2020 and April 2021 were prospectively enrolled. Patients were divided into Group 1 in the absence of superficial and full-thickness necrosis (SN; FTN) and Group 2 in the presence of both. T1 (time between ICG injection and the initial perfusion of the least perfused MSF area), ICG-Q1, and ICG-Q% (absolute and relative perfusion values of the least vascularized area) were collected. RESULTS: 38 breasts were considered. FTN was reported in 4 breasts (10.5%) and SN in 3 (7.9%). The two groups statistically differ in T1 (Group2 > Group1) and ICG-Q% (Group1 > Group2) (p < 0.05). T1 could statistically predict ICG-Q1 and ICG-Q%. Both quantitative values have a sensitivity of 57% and a NPV of 89%; ICG-Q% shows higher specificity (81% vs 77%) and PPV (40% vs 36%). CONCLUSIONS: Quantitative ICG angiography may additionally reduce MSF necrosis. Moreover, longer T1 may indicate possible postoperative necrosis. Considering these factors, intraoperative changes of reconstructive strategy could be adopted to reduce reconstructive failure. Hindawi 2022-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC9187268/ /pubmed/35711883 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5142100 Text en Copyright © 2022 Manuela Mastronardi et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Mastronardi, Manuela
Fracon, Stefano
Scomersi, Serena
Fezzi, Margherita
Bortul, Marina
Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_full Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_fullStr Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_short Role of Qualitative and Quantitative Indocyanine Green Angiography to Assess Mastectomy Skin Flaps Perfusion in Nipple/Skin-Sparing and Skin-Reducing Mastectomies with Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction
title_sort role of qualitative and quantitative indocyanine green angiography to assess mastectomy skin flaps perfusion in nipple/skin-sparing and skin-reducing mastectomies with implant-based breast reconstruction
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187268/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711883
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/5142100
work_keys_str_mv AT mastronardimanuela roleofqualitativeandquantitativeindocyaninegreenangiographytoassessmastectomyskinflapsperfusioninnippleskinsparingandskinreducingmastectomieswithimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT fraconstefano roleofqualitativeandquantitativeindocyaninegreenangiographytoassessmastectomyskinflapsperfusioninnippleskinsparingandskinreducingmastectomieswithimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT scomersiserena roleofqualitativeandquantitativeindocyaninegreenangiographytoassessmastectomyskinflapsperfusioninnippleskinsparingandskinreducingmastectomieswithimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT fezzimargherita roleofqualitativeandquantitativeindocyaninegreenangiographytoassessmastectomyskinflapsperfusioninnippleskinsparingandskinreducingmastectomieswithimplantbasedbreastreconstruction
AT bortulmarina roleofqualitativeandquantitativeindocyaninegreenangiographytoassessmastectomyskinflapsperfusioninnippleskinsparingandskinreducingmastectomieswithimplantbasedbreastreconstruction