Cargando…

A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America

This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Unruh, Lynn, Allin, Sara, Marchildon, Greg, Burke, Sara, Barry, Sarah, Siersbaek, Rikke, Thomas, Steve, Rajan, Selina, Koval, Andriy, Alexander, Mathew, Merkur, Sherry, Webb, Erin, Williams, Gemma A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012
_version_ 1784725184741113856
author Unruh, Lynn
Allin, Sara
Marchildon, Greg
Burke, Sara
Barry, Sarah
Siersbaek, Rikke
Thomas, Steve
Rajan, Selina
Koval, Andriy
Alexander, Mathew
Merkur, Sherry
Webb, Erin
Williams, Gemma A.
author_facet Unruh, Lynn
Allin, Sara
Marchildon, Greg
Burke, Sara
Barry, Sarah
Siersbaek, Rikke
Thomas, Steve
Rajan, Selina
Koval, Andriy
Alexander, Mathew
Merkur, Sherry
Webb, Erin
Williams, Gemma A.
author_sort Unruh, Lynn
collection PubMed
description This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, which has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template completed by country experts. We show all countries faced common challenges during the pandemic, including difficulties in scaling-up testing capacity, implementing timely and appropriate containment measures amid much uncertainty and overcoming shortages of health and social care workers, personal protective equipment and other medical technologies. Country responses to address these issues were similar in many ways, but dissimilar in others, reflecting differences in health system organization and financing, political leadership and governance structures. In the US, lack of universal health coverage have created barriers to accessing care, while political pushback against scientific leadership has likely undermined the crisis response. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent messaging and alignment between health experts and political leadership to increase the level of compliance with public health measures, alongside the need to invest in health infrastructure and training and retaining an adequate domestic health workforce. Building on innovations in care delivery seen during the pandemic, including increased use of digital technology, can also help inform development of more resilient health systems longer-term.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9187506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91875062022-06-13 A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America Unruh, Lynn Allin, Sara Marchildon, Greg Burke, Sara Barry, Sarah Siersbaek, Rikke Thomas, Steve Rajan, Selina Koval, Andriy Alexander, Mathew Merkur, Sherry Webb, Erin Williams, Gemma A. Health Policy Article This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, which has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template completed by country experts. We show all countries faced common challenges during the pandemic, including difficulties in scaling-up testing capacity, implementing timely and appropriate containment measures amid much uncertainty and overcoming shortages of health and social care workers, personal protective equipment and other medical technologies. Country responses to address these issues were similar in many ways, but dissimilar in others, reflecting differences in health system organization and financing, political leadership and governance structures. In the US, lack of universal health coverage have created barriers to accessing care, while political pushback against scientific leadership has likely undermined the crisis response. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent messaging and alignment between health experts and political leadership to increase the level of compliance with public health measures, alongside the need to invest in health infrastructure and training and retaining an adequate domestic health workforce. Building on innovations in care delivery seen during the pandemic, including increased use of digital technology, can also help inform development of more resilient health systems longer-term. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-05 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9187506/ /pubmed/34497031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Unruh, Lynn
Allin, Sara
Marchildon, Greg
Burke, Sara
Barry, Sarah
Siersbaek, Rikke
Thomas, Steve
Rajan, Selina
Koval, Andriy
Alexander, Mathew
Merkur, Sherry
Webb, Erin
Williams, Gemma A.
A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title_full A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title_fullStr A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title_short A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
title_sort comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the covid-19 pandemic in canada, ireland, the united kingdom and the united states of america
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497031
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012
work_keys_str_mv AT unruhlynn acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT allinsara acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT marchildongreg acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT burkesara acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT barrysarah acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT siersbaekrikke acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT thomassteve acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT rajanselina acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT kovalandriy acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT alexandermathew acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT merkursherry acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT webberin acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT williamsgemmaa acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT unruhlynn comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT allinsara comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT marchildongreg comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT burkesara comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT barrysarah comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT siersbaekrikke comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT thomassteve comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT rajanselina comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT kovalandriy comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT alexandermathew comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT merkursherry comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT webberin comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica
AT williamsgemmaa comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica