Cargando…
A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America
This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Published by Elsevier B.V.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012 |
_version_ | 1784725184741113856 |
---|---|
author | Unruh, Lynn Allin, Sara Marchildon, Greg Burke, Sara Barry, Sarah Siersbaek, Rikke Thomas, Steve Rajan, Selina Koval, Andriy Alexander, Mathew Merkur, Sherry Webb, Erin Williams, Gemma A. |
author_facet | Unruh, Lynn Allin, Sara Marchildon, Greg Burke, Sara Barry, Sarah Siersbaek, Rikke Thomas, Steve Rajan, Selina Koval, Andriy Alexander, Mathew Merkur, Sherry Webb, Erin Williams, Gemma A. |
author_sort | Unruh, Lynn |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, which has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template completed by country experts. We show all countries faced common challenges during the pandemic, including difficulties in scaling-up testing capacity, implementing timely and appropriate containment measures amid much uncertainty and overcoming shortages of health and social care workers, personal protective equipment and other medical technologies. Country responses to address these issues were similar in many ways, but dissimilar in others, reflecting differences in health system organization and financing, political leadership and governance structures. In the US, lack of universal health coverage have created barriers to accessing care, while political pushback against scientific leadership has likely undermined the crisis response. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent messaging and alignment between health experts and political leadership to increase the level of compliance with public health measures, alongside the need to invest in health infrastructure and training and retaining an adequate domestic health workforce. Building on innovations in care delivery seen during the pandemic, including increased use of digital technology, can also help inform development of more resilient health systems longer-term. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9187506 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91875062022-06-13 A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America Unruh, Lynn Allin, Sara Marchildon, Greg Burke, Sara Barry, Sarah Siersbaek, Rikke Thomas, Steve Rajan, Selina Koval, Andriy Alexander, Mathew Merkur, Sherry Webb, Erin Williams, Gemma A. Health Policy Article This paper compares health policy responses to COVID-19 in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and United States of America (US) from January to November 2020, with the aim of facilitating cross-country learning. Evidence is taken from the COVID-19 Health System Response Monitor, a joint initiative of the European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, the WHO Regional Office for Europe, and the European Commission, which has documented country responses to COVID-19 using a structured template completed by country experts. We show all countries faced common challenges during the pandemic, including difficulties in scaling-up testing capacity, implementing timely and appropriate containment measures amid much uncertainty and overcoming shortages of health and social care workers, personal protective equipment and other medical technologies. Country responses to address these issues were similar in many ways, but dissimilar in others, reflecting differences in health system organization and financing, political leadership and governance structures. In the US, lack of universal health coverage have created barriers to accessing care, while political pushback against scientific leadership has likely undermined the crisis response. Our findings highlight the importance of consistent messaging and alignment between health experts and political leadership to increase the level of compliance with public health measures, alongside the need to invest in health infrastructure and training and retaining an adequate domestic health workforce. Building on innovations in care delivery seen during the pandemic, including increased use of digital technology, can also help inform development of more resilient health systems longer-term. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2022-05 2021-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC9187506/ /pubmed/34497031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012 Text en © 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Unruh, Lynn Allin, Sara Marchildon, Greg Burke, Sara Barry, Sarah Siersbaek, Rikke Thomas, Steve Rajan, Selina Koval, Andriy Alexander, Mathew Merkur, Sherry Webb, Erin Williams, Gemma A. A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title | A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title_full | A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title_fullStr | A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title_short | A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America |
title_sort | comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the covid-19 pandemic in canada, ireland, the united kingdom and the united states of america |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9187506/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34497031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.06.012 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT unruhlynn acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT allinsara acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT marchildongreg acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT burkesara acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT barrysarah acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT siersbaekrikke acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT thomassteve acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT rajanselina acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT kovalandriy acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT alexandermathew acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT merkursherry acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT webberin acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT williamsgemmaa acomparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT unruhlynn comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT allinsara comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT marchildongreg comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT burkesara comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT barrysarah comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT siersbaekrikke comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT thomassteve comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT rajanselina comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT kovalandriy comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT alexandermathew comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT merkursherry comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT webberin comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica AT williamsgemmaa comparisonof2020healthpolicyresponsestothecovid19pandemicincanadairelandtheunitedkingdomandtheunitedstatesofamerica |