Cargando…

Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?

BACKGROUND: In absence of contraindication, breast cancer patients of reproductive age can undergo fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before the administration of potentially gonadotoxic treatments. High hormonal levels induced by ovarian st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lalami, Imane, Labrosse, Julie, Cedrin-Durnerin, Isabelle, Comtet, Marjorie, Vinolas, Claire, Krief, Fabien, Sifer, Christophe, Peigne, Maeliss, Grynberg, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00958-7
_version_ 1784725292554649600
author Lalami, Imane
Labrosse, Julie
Cedrin-Durnerin, Isabelle
Comtet, Marjorie
Vinolas, Claire
Krief, Fabien
Sifer, Christophe
Peigne, Maeliss
Grynberg, Michael
author_facet Lalami, Imane
Labrosse, Julie
Cedrin-Durnerin, Isabelle
Comtet, Marjorie
Vinolas, Claire
Krief, Fabien
Sifer, Christophe
Peigne, Maeliss
Grynberg, Michael
author_sort Lalami, Imane
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In absence of contraindication, breast cancer patients of reproductive age can undergo fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before the administration of potentially gonadotoxic treatments. High hormonal levels induced by ovarian stimulation might have an adverse impact on hormone-positive breast cancer. Whether letrozole supplementation during ovarian stimulation (COSTLES) reduces serum progesterone levels after GnRHa trigger remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether COSTLES might be useful for breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist (GnRHa)trigger. METHODS: All women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRHa trigger were included. Serum progesterone level measured 12 h after GnRHa trigger was compared between patients undergoing COS with letrozole supplementation (COSTLES group) and patients undergoing COS without letrozole (Control group) for fertility preservation purposes. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, of which 84 patients (34.1%) in the COSTLES group and 162 patients (65.6%) in the Control group. All patients in the COSTLES group were BC patients (n = 84, 100%), while the Control group included 77 BC patients (47.5%). Patients in the two groups were comparable. The mean number of oocytes recovered and vitrified at metaphase 2 stage did not significantly differ between the two groups. Serum progesterone levels on the day after GnRHa trigger were significantly lower in the COSTLES group (8.6 ± 0.7 vs. 10.5 ± 0.5 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.03), as well as serum E2 levels (650.3 ± 57.7 vs. 2451.4.0 ± 144.0 pg/mL, respectively, p < 0.01). However, the GnRHa-induced LH surge was significantly higher in in the COSTLES group (71.9 ± 4.6 vs. 51.2 ± 2.6 UI/L, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that COSTLES for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients using GnRHa trigger reduces serum progesterone levels compared to ovarian stimulation without letrozole. These findings encourage the use of COSTLES in this context to decrease the potential deleterious effect of elevated hormonal levels on hormone-positive breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188055
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91880552022-06-12 Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger? Lalami, Imane Labrosse, Julie Cedrin-Durnerin, Isabelle Comtet, Marjorie Vinolas, Claire Krief, Fabien Sifer, Christophe Peigne, Maeliss Grynberg, Michael Reprod Biol Endocrinol Research BACKGROUND: In absence of contraindication, breast cancer patients of reproductive age can undergo fertility preservation with controlled ovarian stimulation for oocyte/embryo cryopreservation before the administration of potentially gonadotoxic treatments. High hormonal levels induced by ovarian stimulation might have an adverse impact on hormone-positive breast cancer. Whether letrozole supplementation during ovarian stimulation (COSTLES) reduces serum progesterone levels after GnRHa trigger remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether COSTLES might be useful for breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist (GnRHa)trigger. METHODS: All women who underwent COS with GnRH antagonist protocol with GnRHa trigger were included. Serum progesterone level measured 12 h after GnRHa trigger was compared between patients undergoing COS with letrozole supplementation (COSTLES group) and patients undergoing COS without letrozole (Control group) for fertility preservation purposes. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were included, of which 84 patients (34.1%) in the COSTLES group and 162 patients (65.6%) in the Control group. All patients in the COSTLES group were BC patients (n = 84, 100%), while the Control group included 77 BC patients (47.5%). Patients in the two groups were comparable. The mean number of oocytes recovered and vitrified at metaphase 2 stage did not significantly differ between the two groups. Serum progesterone levels on the day after GnRHa trigger were significantly lower in the COSTLES group (8.6 ± 0.7 vs. 10.5 ± 0.5 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.03), as well as serum E2 levels (650.3 ± 57.7 vs. 2451.4.0 ± 144.0 pg/mL, respectively, p < 0.01). However, the GnRHa-induced LH surge was significantly higher in in the COSTLES group (71.9 ± 4.6 vs. 51.2 ± 2.6 UI/L, respectively, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that COSTLES for fertility preservation in breast cancer patients using GnRHa trigger reduces serum progesterone levels compared to ovarian stimulation without letrozole. These findings encourage the use of COSTLES in this context to decrease the potential deleterious effect of elevated hormonal levels on hormone-positive breast cancer. BioMed Central 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9188055/ /pubmed/35690817 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00958-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Lalami, Imane
Labrosse, Julie
Cedrin-Durnerin, Isabelle
Comtet, Marjorie
Vinolas, Claire
Krief, Fabien
Sifer, Christophe
Peigne, Maeliss
Grynberg, Michael
Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title_full Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title_fullStr Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title_full_unstemmed Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title_short Is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following GnRH-agonist trigger?
title_sort is letrozole during ovarian stimulation useful in breast cancer patients undergoing fertility preservation to reduce early luteal progesterone levels following gnrh-agonist trigger?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188055/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690817
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12958-022-00958-7
work_keys_str_mv AT lalamiimane isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT labrossejulie isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT cedrindurnerinisabelle isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT comtetmarjorie isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT vinolasclaire isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT krieffabien isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT siferchristophe isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT peignemaeliss isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger
AT grynbergmichael isletrozoleduringovarianstimulationusefulinbreastcancerpatientsundergoingfertilitypreservationtoreduceearlylutealprogesteronelevelsfollowinggnrhagonisttrigger