Cargando…

Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis

BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, emergency surgery may not be indicated due to complications and disease severity. Patients requiring drainage are usually treated with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), whereas pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kaneta, Anri, Sasada, Hirotaka, Matsumoto, Takuma, Sakai, Tsuyoshi, Sato, Shuichi, Hara, Takashi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01676-y
_version_ 1784725316644634624
author Kaneta, Anri
Sasada, Hirotaka
Matsumoto, Takuma
Sakai, Tsuyoshi
Sato, Shuichi
Hara, Takashi
author_facet Kaneta, Anri
Sasada, Hirotaka
Matsumoto, Takuma
Sakai, Tsuyoshi
Sato, Shuichi
Hara, Takashi
author_sort Kaneta, Anri
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, emergency surgery may not be indicated due to complications and disease severity. Patients requiring drainage are usually treated with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), whereas patients with biliary duct stones undergo endoscopic stones removal followed by endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EGBD). Herein, we investigated the efficacy of EGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Overall, 101 patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2019 and September 2020 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The patients (n = 101) were divided into three groups: control group that did not undergo drainage (n = 68), a group that underwent EGBD (n = 7), and a group that underwent PTGBD (n = 26). Median surgery time was 107, 166, and 143 min, respectively. Control group had a significantly shorter surgery time, whereas it did not significantly differ between EGBD and PTGBD groups. The median amount of bleeding was 5 g, 7 g, and 7.5 g, respectively, and control group had significantly less bleeding than the drainage group. We further divided patients into the following subgroups: patients requiring a 5 mm clip to ligate the cystic duct, patients requiring a 10 mm clip due to the thickness of the cystic duct, patients requiring an automatic suturing device, and patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy due to impossible cystic duct ligation. There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD regarding the clip used or the need for an automatic suturing device and subtotal cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD groups regarding surgery time or bleeding amount when surgery was performed after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Therefore, EGBD was considered a useful preoperative drainage method requiring no drainage bag.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188174
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91881742022-06-12 Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis Kaneta, Anri Sasada, Hirotaka Matsumoto, Takuma Sakai, Tsuyoshi Sato, Shuichi Hara, Takashi BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: Early cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with acute cholecystitis. However, emergency surgery may not be indicated due to complications and disease severity. Patients requiring drainage are usually treated with percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD), whereas patients with biliary duct stones undergo endoscopic stones removal followed by endoscopic gallbladder drainage (EGBD). Herein, we investigated the efficacy of EGBD in patients with acute cholecystitis. METHODS: Overall, 101 patients receiving laparoscopic cholecystectomy between September 2019 and September 2020 in our department were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The patients (n = 101) were divided into three groups: control group that did not undergo drainage (n = 68), a group that underwent EGBD (n = 7), and a group that underwent PTGBD (n = 26). Median surgery time was 107, 166, and 143 min, respectively. Control group had a significantly shorter surgery time, whereas it did not significantly differ between EGBD and PTGBD groups. The median amount of bleeding was 5 g, 7 g, and 7.5 g, respectively, and control group had significantly less bleeding than the drainage group. We further divided patients into the following subgroups: patients requiring a 5 mm clip to ligate the cystic duct, patients requiring a 10 mm clip due to the thickness of the cystic duct, patients requiring an automatic suturing device, and patients undergoing subtotal cholecystectomy due to impossible cystic duct ligation. There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD regarding the clip used or the need for an automatic suturing device and subtotal cholecystectomy. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between EGBD and PTGBD groups regarding surgery time or bleeding amount when surgery was performed after gallbladder drainage for acute cholecystitis. Therefore, EGBD was considered a useful preoperative drainage method requiring no drainage bag. BioMed Central 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9188174/ /pubmed/35690750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01676-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kaneta, Anri
Sasada, Hirotaka
Matsumoto, Takuma
Sakai, Tsuyoshi
Sato, Shuichi
Hara, Takashi
Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title_full Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title_fullStr Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title_short Efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
title_sort efficacy of endoscopic gallbladder drainage in patients with acute cholecystitis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188174/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12893-022-01676-y
work_keys_str_mv AT kanetaanri efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis
AT sasadahirotaka efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis
AT matsumototakuma efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis
AT sakaitsuyoshi efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis
AT satoshuichi efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis
AT haratakashi efficacyofendoscopicgallbladderdrainageinpatientswithacutecholecystitis