Cargando…

Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Treatment of superficial venous reflux has been shown to improve ulcer healing time and reduce the risk of ulcer recurrence. Terminal ablation of the reflux source (TIRS) is an alternative to formal endovenous ablation or surgery which can be performed by injecting sclerosant foam into t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Keohane, C. R., Westby, D., Twyford, M., Ahern, T., Tawfick, W., Walsh, S. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4
_version_ 1784725318637977600
author Keohane, C. R.
Westby, D.
Twyford, M.
Ahern, T.
Tawfick, W.
Walsh, S. R.
author_facet Keohane, C. R.
Westby, D.
Twyford, M.
Ahern, T.
Tawfick, W.
Walsh, S. R.
author_sort Keohane, C. R.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment of superficial venous reflux has been shown to improve ulcer healing time and reduce the risk of ulcer recurrence. Terminal ablation of the reflux source (TIRS) is an alternative to formal endovenous ablation or surgery which can be performed by injecting sclerosant foam into the peri-ulcer plexus of the veins. TIRS has been shown to be successful and in our experience is the option preferred by many patients, when offered as an alternative to axial ablation (AA). AIM: To determine if the proportion of ulcers healed within 6 months of endovenous treatment differs between patients undergoing AA of varicose veins or TIRS by peri-ulcer foam sclerotherapy. METHODS: AAVTIRS is an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from a dedicated ulcer clinic in Roscommon University Hospital and from the vascular surgical clinics in University Hospital Galway. All patients attending the ulcer clinic will be screened for eligibility. RANDOMISATION: Random computer-generated sequence is stratified by ulcer size. Allocation will be concealed using sealed opaque envelopes. BLINDING: Assessors reviewing wounds at follow -p visits will be blinded to patient allocation. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The proportion of ulcers healed within 6 months of enrolment. DISCUSSION: This will be the first time that TIRS has been evaluated with a properly powered randomised trial in the setting of venous ulcer management. Streamlining the management of venous ulcers has broad health economic benefits. If it is found that TIRS is superior or non-inferior to AA, then a less expensive, less invasive injection can be offered as an alternative to AA in an attempt to encourage the healing of venous ulcers. If AA is found to be superior to TIRS, then this would suggest that all patients undergoing ablation in the management of venous ulcers should have their superficial reflux fully treated, building on the evidence of the EVRA trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04484168. Registered on 23 July 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188187
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91881872022-06-12 Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial Keohane, C. R. Westby, D. Twyford, M. Ahern, T. Tawfick, W. Walsh, S. R. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Treatment of superficial venous reflux has been shown to improve ulcer healing time and reduce the risk of ulcer recurrence. Terminal ablation of the reflux source (TIRS) is an alternative to formal endovenous ablation or surgery which can be performed by injecting sclerosant foam into the peri-ulcer plexus of the veins. TIRS has been shown to be successful and in our experience is the option preferred by many patients, when offered as an alternative to axial ablation (AA). AIM: To determine if the proportion of ulcers healed within 6 months of endovenous treatment differs between patients undergoing AA of varicose veins or TIRS by peri-ulcer foam sclerotherapy. METHODS: AAVTIRS is an assessor-blinded randomised controlled trial. Patients will be recruited from a dedicated ulcer clinic in Roscommon University Hospital and from the vascular surgical clinics in University Hospital Galway. All patients attending the ulcer clinic will be screened for eligibility. RANDOMISATION: Random computer-generated sequence is stratified by ulcer size. Allocation will be concealed using sealed opaque envelopes. BLINDING: Assessors reviewing wounds at follow -p visits will be blinded to patient allocation. PRIMARY ENDPOINT: The proportion of ulcers healed within 6 months of enrolment. DISCUSSION: This will be the first time that TIRS has been evaluated with a properly powered randomised trial in the setting of venous ulcer management. Streamlining the management of venous ulcers has broad health economic benefits. If it is found that TIRS is superior or non-inferior to AA, then a less expensive, less invasive injection can be offered as an alternative to AA in an attempt to encourage the healing of venous ulcers. If AA is found to be superior to TIRS, then this would suggest that all patients undergoing ablation in the management of venous ulcers should have their superficial reflux fully treated, building on the evidence of the EVRA trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04484168. Registered on 23 July 2020 SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4. BioMed Central 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9188187/ /pubmed/35689289 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Keohane, C. R.
Westby, D.
Twyford, M.
Ahern, T.
Tawfick, W.
Walsh, S. R.
Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title_full Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title_short Axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (AAVTIRS): a randomised controlled trial
title_sort axial ablation versus terminal interruption of the reflux source (aavtirs): a randomised controlled trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188187/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689289
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-06440-4
work_keys_str_mv AT keohanecr axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT westbyd axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT twyfordm axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ahernt axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT tawfickw axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT walshsr axialablationversusterminalinterruptionoftherefluxsourceaavtirsarandomisedcontrolledtrial