Cargando…

Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews

BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for hereditary cancer syndromes is recommended in primary care, but family history is rarely collected in enough detail to facilitate risk assessment and referral – a roadblock that disproportionately impacts individuals with healthcare access barriers. We sought to quali...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mittendorf, Kathleen F., Lewis, Hannah S., Duenas, Devan M., Eubanks, Donna J., Gilmore, Marian J., Goddard, Katrina A. B., Joseph, Galen, Kauffman, Tia L., Kraft, Stephanie A., Lindberg, Nangel M., Reyes, Ana A., Shuster, Elizabeth, Syngal, Sapna, Ukaegbu, Chinedu, Zepp, Jamilyn M., Wilfond, Benjamin S., Porter, Kathryn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3
_version_ 1784725324817235968
author Mittendorf, Kathleen F.
Lewis, Hannah S.
Duenas, Devan M.
Eubanks, Donna J.
Gilmore, Marian J.
Goddard, Katrina A. B.
Joseph, Galen
Kauffman, Tia L.
Kraft, Stephanie A.
Lindberg, Nangel M.
Reyes, Ana A.
Shuster, Elizabeth
Syngal, Sapna
Ukaegbu, Chinedu
Zepp, Jamilyn M.
Wilfond, Benjamin S.
Porter, Kathryn M.
author_facet Mittendorf, Kathleen F.
Lewis, Hannah S.
Duenas, Devan M.
Eubanks, Donna J.
Gilmore, Marian J.
Goddard, Katrina A. B.
Joseph, Galen
Kauffman, Tia L.
Kraft, Stephanie A.
Lindberg, Nangel M.
Reyes, Ana A.
Shuster, Elizabeth
Syngal, Sapna
Ukaegbu, Chinedu
Zepp, Jamilyn M.
Wilfond, Benjamin S.
Porter, Kathryn M.
author_sort Mittendorf, Kathleen F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for hereditary cancer syndromes is recommended in primary care, but family history is rarely collected in enough detail to facilitate risk assessment and referral – a roadblock that disproportionately impacts individuals with healthcare access barriers. We sought to qualitatively assess a literacy-adapted, electronic patient-facing family history tool developed for use in diverse, underserved patient populations recruited in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study. METHODS: Interview participants were recruited from a subpopulation of CHARM participants who experienced barriers to tool use in terms of spending a longer time to complete the tool, having incomplete attempts, and/or providing inaccurate family history in comparison to a genetic counselor-collected standard. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants about barriers and facilitators to tool use and overall tool acceptability; interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were coded based on a codebook developed using inductive techniques, and coded excerpts were reviewed to identify overarching themes related to barriers and facilitators to family history self-assessment and acceptability of the study tool. RESULTS: Interviewees endorsed the tool as easy to navigate and understand. However, they described barriers related to family history information, literacy and language, and certain tool functions. Participants offered concrete, easy-to-implement solutions to each barrier. Despite experience barriers to use of the tool, most participants indicated that electronic family history self-assessment was acceptable or preferable in comparison to clinician-collected family history. CONCLUSIONS: Even for participants who experienced barriers to tool use, family history self-assessment was considered an acceptable alternative to clinician-collected family history. Barriers experienced could be overcome with minor adaptations to the current family history tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a sub-study of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) trial, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03426878. Registered 8 February 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188215
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91882152022-06-12 Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews Mittendorf, Kathleen F. Lewis, Hannah S. Duenas, Devan M. Eubanks, Donna J. Gilmore, Marian J. Goddard, Katrina A. B. Joseph, Galen Kauffman, Tia L. Kraft, Stephanie A. Lindberg, Nangel M. Reyes, Ana A. Shuster, Elizabeth Syngal, Sapna Ukaegbu, Chinedu Zepp, Jamilyn M. Wilfond, Benjamin S. Porter, Kathryn M. Hered Cancer Clin Pract Research BACKGROUND: Risk assessment for hereditary cancer syndromes is recommended in primary care, but family history is rarely collected in enough detail to facilitate risk assessment and referral – a roadblock that disproportionately impacts individuals with healthcare access barriers. We sought to qualitatively assess a literacy-adapted, electronic patient-facing family history tool developed for use in diverse, underserved patient populations recruited in the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) Study. METHODS: Interview participants were recruited from a subpopulation of CHARM participants who experienced barriers to tool use in terms of spending a longer time to complete the tool, having incomplete attempts, and/or providing inaccurate family history in comparison to a genetic counselor-collected standard. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants about barriers and facilitators to tool use and overall tool acceptability; interviews were recorded and professionally transcribed. Transcripts were coded based on a codebook developed using inductive techniques, and coded excerpts were reviewed to identify overarching themes related to barriers and facilitators to family history self-assessment and acceptability of the study tool. RESULTS: Interviewees endorsed the tool as easy to navigate and understand. However, they described barriers related to family history information, literacy and language, and certain tool functions. Participants offered concrete, easy-to-implement solutions to each barrier. Despite experience barriers to use of the tool, most participants indicated that electronic family history self-assessment was acceptable or preferable in comparison to clinician-collected family history. CONCLUSIONS: Even for participants who experienced barriers to tool use, family history self-assessment was considered an acceptable alternative to clinician-collected family history. Barriers experienced could be overcome with minor adaptations to the current family history tool. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study is a sub-study of the Cancer Health Assessments Reaching Many (CHARM) trial, ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03426878. Registered 8 February 2018. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3. BioMed Central 2022-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC9188215/ /pubmed/35689290 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mittendorf, Kathleen F.
Lewis, Hannah S.
Duenas, Devan M.
Eubanks, Donna J.
Gilmore, Marian J.
Goddard, Katrina A. B.
Joseph, Galen
Kauffman, Tia L.
Kraft, Stephanie A.
Lindberg, Nangel M.
Reyes, Ana A.
Shuster, Elizabeth
Syngal, Sapna
Ukaegbu, Chinedu
Zepp, Jamilyn M.
Wilfond, Benjamin S.
Porter, Kathryn M.
Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title_full Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title_fullStr Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title_full_unstemmed Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title_short Literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
title_sort literacy-adapted, electronic family history assessment for genetics referral in primary care: patient user insights from qualitative interviews
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188215/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35689290
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13053-022-00231-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mittendorfkathleenf literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT lewishannahs literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT duenasdevanm literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT eubanksdonnaj literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT gilmoremarianj literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT goddardkatrinaab literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT josephgalen literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT kauffmantial literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT kraftstephaniea literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT lindbergnangelm literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT reyesanaa literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT shusterelizabeth literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT syngalsapna literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT ukaegbuchinedu literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT zeppjamilynm literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT wilfondbenjamins literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews
AT porterkathrynm literacyadaptedelectronicfamilyhistoryassessmentforgeneticsreferralinprimarycarepatientuserinsightsfromqualitativeinterviews