Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Durvalumab and atezolizumab are approved as first-line therapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Although cost-effectiveness analyses compared these immunotherapy drugs with standard chemotherapy-alone regimens, no head-to-head cost-effectiveness comparisons for t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35604530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01157-3 |
_version_ | 1784725388970164224 |
---|---|
author | Ionova, Yelena Vuong, Wilson Sandoval, Omar Fong, Jodie Vu, Vincent Zhong, Lixian Wilson, Leslie |
author_facet | Ionova, Yelena Vuong, Wilson Sandoval, Omar Fong, Jodie Vu, Vincent Zhong, Lixian Wilson, Leslie |
author_sort | Ionova, Yelena |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Durvalumab and atezolizumab are approved as first-line therapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Although cost-effectiveness analyses compared these immunotherapy drugs with standard chemotherapy-alone regimens, no head-to-head cost-effectiveness comparisons for these treatments exist. The aim of the present analysis is to determine the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab and atezolizumab as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer from the US payers’ perspective. METHODS: This study is based on two placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials: CASPIAN and IMpower133. A Markov model was developed to simulate the three health states: progression-free survival, progressed disease, and death in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Transition probabilities were estimated from the clinical trial survival curves and extended with life-time modelling. Health utilities and direct costs of adverse event treatment were included. Main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using quality-adjusted life-years saved (QALYS). Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of variables on the ICER. RESULTS: Durvalumab group has a cost of $187,503 with an effectiveness of 1.08 while atezolizumab has a cost of $160,219 and an effectiveness of 0.932. Durvalumab is not cost-effective compared to atezolizumab with an ICER of $165,182 QALYS, which is over the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000. The model was most sensitive to durvalumab cost and the cost of treating durvalumab adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: With the ICER of durvalumab treatment group being very close to $150,000, setting a higher willingness-to-pay threshold or decreasing the drug cost through contract pricing can increase the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab compared to atezolizumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01157-3. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9188525 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91885252022-06-13 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA Ionova, Yelena Vuong, Wilson Sandoval, Omar Fong, Jodie Vu, Vincent Zhong, Lixian Wilson, Leslie Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Durvalumab and atezolizumab are approved as first-line therapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Although cost-effectiveness analyses compared these immunotherapy drugs with standard chemotherapy-alone regimens, no head-to-head cost-effectiveness comparisons for these treatments exist. The aim of the present analysis is to determine the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab and atezolizumab as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer from the US payers’ perspective. METHODS: This study is based on two placebo-controlled, phase 3 clinical trials: CASPIAN and IMpower133. A Markov model was developed to simulate the three health states: progression-free survival, progressed disease, and death in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer. Transition probabilities were estimated from the clinical trial survival curves and extended with life-time modelling. Health utilities and direct costs of adverse event treatment were included. Main outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) using quality-adjusted life-years saved (QALYS). Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the impact of variables on the ICER. RESULTS: Durvalumab group has a cost of $187,503 with an effectiveness of 1.08 while atezolizumab has a cost of $160,219 and an effectiveness of 0.932. Durvalumab is not cost-effective compared to atezolizumab with an ICER of $165,182 QALYS, which is over the willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000. The model was most sensitive to durvalumab cost and the cost of treating durvalumab adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: With the ICER of durvalumab treatment group being very close to $150,000, setting a higher willingness-to-pay threshold or decreasing the drug cost through contract pricing can increase the cost-effectiveness of durvalumab compared to atezolizumab. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-022-01157-3. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-23 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9188525/ /pubmed/35604530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01157-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Ionova, Yelena Vuong, Wilson Sandoval, Omar Fong, Jodie Vu, Vincent Zhong, Lixian Wilson, Leslie Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Atezolizumab Versus Durvalumab as First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer in the USA |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of atezolizumab versus durvalumab as first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in the usa |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188525/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35604530 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-022-01157-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ionovayelena costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT vuongwilson costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT sandovalomar costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT fongjodie costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT vuvincent costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT zhonglixian costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa AT wilsonleslie costeffectivenessanalysisofatezolizumabversusdurvalumabasfirstlinetreatmentofextensivestagesmallcelllungcancerintheusa |