Cargando…

Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice

The clinical yield and benefit of performing bone marrow cultures for various clinical indications has been challenged and their clinical necessity remains debatable. We sought to assess the clinical yield and benefit of performing routine bone marrow cultures and determine whether various clinical,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharvit, Gal, Schwartz, Daniel, Heering, Gabriel, Shulman, Alexander, Avigdor, Abraham, Rahav, Galia, Toren, Amos, Nagler, Arnon, Canaani, Jonathan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14059-3
_version_ 1784725402869039104
author Sharvit, Gal
Schwartz, Daniel
Heering, Gabriel
Shulman, Alexander
Avigdor, Abraham
Rahav, Galia
Toren, Amos
Nagler, Arnon
Canaani, Jonathan
author_facet Sharvit, Gal
Schwartz, Daniel
Heering, Gabriel
Shulman, Alexander
Avigdor, Abraham
Rahav, Galia
Toren, Amos
Nagler, Arnon
Canaani, Jonathan
author_sort Sharvit, Gal
collection PubMed
description The clinical yield and benefit of performing bone marrow cultures for various clinical indications has been challenged and their clinical necessity remains debatable. We sought to assess the clinical yield and benefit of performing routine bone marrow cultures and determine whether various clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were predictive of a diagnostic bone marrow culture. This was a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a bone marrow study comprising bone marrow cultures from January 1, 2012, through March 1, 2018. Baseline clinical data were extracted from the institution's electronic medical records system. The analyzed cohort consisted of 139 patients with a median age of 46 years (range 4 months to 85 years). The most common indication for a bone marrow study was workup of a fever of unknown origin (105 patients, 76%) while investigation for infection in immunocompromised patients accounted for 22 cases (16%) and suspected tuberculosis was the reason for acquisition of bone marrow cultures in 6 patients (4%). Only 3 patients had positive bone marrow cultures, yielding in 2 patients a diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium and in one patient a microbiologically unclassifiable fungal infection. A univariate analysis revealed that mean age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, c-reactive protein levels, gender, indication for bone marrow study, yield of blood cultures, and contribution of imaging studies and bone marrow pathology results were not significantly different between patients with diagnostic and non-diagnostic bone marrow cultures. Mean white blood cell count was found to be significantly lower in patients with diagnostic bone marrow cultures (2.4 × 10(3)/µL versus 8.7 × 10(3)/µL; P = 0.038). We conclude that for most patients, performance of bone marrow cultures holds limited clinical value.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188585
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91885852022-06-13 Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice Sharvit, Gal Schwartz, Daniel Heering, Gabriel Shulman, Alexander Avigdor, Abraham Rahav, Galia Toren, Amos Nagler, Arnon Canaani, Jonathan Sci Rep Article The clinical yield and benefit of performing bone marrow cultures for various clinical indications has been challenged and their clinical necessity remains debatable. We sought to assess the clinical yield and benefit of performing routine bone marrow cultures and determine whether various clinical, laboratory, and imaging parameters were predictive of a diagnostic bone marrow culture. This was a single center retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent a bone marrow study comprising bone marrow cultures from January 1, 2012, through March 1, 2018. Baseline clinical data were extracted from the institution's electronic medical records system. The analyzed cohort consisted of 139 patients with a median age of 46 years (range 4 months to 85 years). The most common indication for a bone marrow study was workup of a fever of unknown origin (105 patients, 76%) while investigation for infection in immunocompromised patients accounted for 22 cases (16%) and suspected tuberculosis was the reason for acquisition of bone marrow cultures in 6 patients (4%). Only 3 patients had positive bone marrow cultures, yielding in 2 patients a diagnosis of Mycobacterium avium and in one patient a microbiologically unclassifiable fungal infection. A univariate analysis revealed that mean age, hemoglobin level, platelet count, c-reactive protein levels, gender, indication for bone marrow study, yield of blood cultures, and contribution of imaging studies and bone marrow pathology results were not significantly different between patients with diagnostic and non-diagnostic bone marrow cultures. Mean white blood cell count was found to be significantly lower in patients with diagnostic bone marrow cultures (2.4 × 10(3)/µL versus 8.7 × 10(3)/µL; P = 0.038). We conclude that for most patients, performance of bone marrow cultures holds limited clinical value. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9188585/ /pubmed/35690634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14059-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Sharvit, Gal
Schwartz, Daniel
Heering, Gabriel
Shulman, Alexander
Avigdor, Abraham
Rahav, Galia
Toren, Amos
Nagler, Arnon
Canaani, Jonathan
Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title_full Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title_fullStr Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title_short Evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
title_sort evaluation of the clinical impact of bone marrow cultures in current medical practice
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188585/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-14059-3
work_keys_str_mv AT sharvitgal evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT schwartzdaniel evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT heeringgabriel evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT shulmanalexander evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT avigdorabraham evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT rahavgalia evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT torenamos evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT naglerarnon evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice
AT canaanijonathan evaluationoftheclinicalimpactofbonemarrowculturesincurrentmedicalpractice