Cargando…

Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy

We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (<...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Iwamura, Hiromichi, Hatakeyama, Shingo, Narita, Takuma, Ozaki, Yusuke, Konishi, Sakae, Horiguchi, Hirotaka, Kodama, Hirotake, Kojima, Yuta, Fujita, Naoki, Okamoto, Teppei, Tobisawa, Yuki, Yoneyama, Tohru, Yamamoto, Hayato, Yoneyama, Takahiro, Hashimoto, Yasuhiro, Ohyama, Chikara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x
_version_ 1784725404073852928
author Iwamura, Hiromichi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Narita, Takuma
Ozaki, Yusuke
Konishi, Sakae
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Kodama, Hirotake
Kojima, Yuta
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Tobisawa, Yuki
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_facet Iwamura, Hiromichi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Narita, Takuma
Ozaki, Yusuke
Konishi, Sakae
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Kodama, Hirotake
Kojima, Yuta
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Tobisawa, Yuki
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
author_sort Iwamura, Hiromichi
collection PubMed
description We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9188590
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91885902022-06-13 Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy Iwamura, Hiromichi Hatakeyama, Shingo Narita, Takuma Ozaki, Yusuke Konishi, Sakae Horiguchi, Hirotaka Kodama, Hirotake Kojima, Yuta Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Tobisawa, Yuki Yoneyama, Tohru Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara Sci Rep Article We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9188590/ /pubmed/35690635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Iwamura, Hiromichi
Hatakeyama, Shingo
Narita, Takuma
Ozaki, Yusuke
Konishi, Sakae
Horiguchi, Hirotaka
Kodama, Hirotake
Kojima, Yuta
Fujita, Naoki
Okamoto, Teppei
Tobisawa, Yuki
Yoneyama, Tohru
Yamamoto, Hayato
Yoneyama, Takahiro
Hashimoto, Yasuhiro
Ohyama, Chikara
Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title_full Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title_fullStr Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title_full_unstemmed Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title_short Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
title_sort significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188590/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690635
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x
work_keys_str_mv AT iwamurahiromichi significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT hatakeyamashingo significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT naritatakuma significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT ozakiyusuke significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT konishisakae significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT horiguchihirotaka significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT kodamahirotake significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT kojimayuta significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT fujitanaoki significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT okamototeppei significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT tobisawayuki significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT yoneyamatohru significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT yamamotohayato significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT yoneyamatakahiro significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT hashimotoyasuhiro significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy
AT ohyamachikara significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy