Cargando…
Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy
We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (<...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x |
_version_ | 1784725404073852928 |
---|---|
author | Iwamura, Hiromichi Hatakeyama, Shingo Narita, Takuma Ozaki, Yusuke Konishi, Sakae Horiguchi, Hirotaka Kodama, Hirotake Kojima, Yuta Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Tobisawa, Yuki Yoneyama, Tohru Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_facet | Iwamura, Hiromichi Hatakeyama, Shingo Narita, Takuma Ozaki, Yusuke Konishi, Sakae Horiguchi, Hirotaka Kodama, Hirotake Kojima, Yuta Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Tobisawa, Yuki Yoneyama, Tohru Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara |
author_sort | Iwamura, Hiromichi |
collection | PubMed |
description | We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9188590 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91885902022-06-13 Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy Iwamura, Hiromichi Hatakeyama, Shingo Narita, Takuma Ozaki, Yusuke Konishi, Sakae Horiguchi, Hirotaka Kodama, Hirotake Kojima, Yuta Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Tobisawa, Yuki Yoneyama, Tohru Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara Sci Rep Article We aimed to determine the survival and staging benefit of limited pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) during radical prostatectomy (RP) in high-risk prostate cancer (PC) patients treated with neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy. We retrospectively analyzed 516 patients with high-risk localized PC (< cT4N0M0) who received neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy plus estramustine phosphate followed by RP between January 2010 and March 2020. Since we stopped limited PLND for such patients in October 2015, we compared the surgical outcomes and biochemical recurrence-free survival (BCR-FS) between the limited-PLND group (before October 2015, n = 283) and the non-PLND group (after November 2015, n = 233). The rate of node metastases in the limited-PLND group were 0.8% (2/283). Operation time was significantly longer (176 vs. 162 min) and the rate of surgical complications were much higher (all grades; 19 vs. 6%, grade ≥ 3; 3 vs. 0%) in the limited-PLND group. The inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox analysis revealed limited PLND had no significant impact on BCR-FS (hazard ratio, 1.44; P = 0.469). Limited PLND during RP after neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy showed quite low rate of positive nodes, higher rate of complications, and no significant impact on BCR-FS. Nature Publishing Group UK 2022-06-11 /pmc/articles/PMC9188590/ /pubmed/35690635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Iwamura, Hiromichi Hatakeyama, Shingo Narita, Takuma Ozaki, Yusuke Konishi, Sakae Horiguchi, Hirotaka Kodama, Hirotake Kojima, Yuta Fujita, Naoki Okamoto, Teppei Tobisawa, Yuki Yoneyama, Tohru Yamamoto, Hayato Yoneyama, Takahiro Hashimoto, Yasuhiro Ohyama, Chikara Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title | Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title_full | Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title_fullStr | Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title_short | Significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
title_sort | significance of pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy in high-risk prostate cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188590/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35690635 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-13651-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT iwamurahiromichi significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT hatakeyamashingo significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT naritatakuma significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT ozakiyusuke significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT konishisakae significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT horiguchihirotaka significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT kodamahirotake significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT kojimayuta significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT fujitanaoki significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT okamototeppei significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT tobisawayuki significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT yoneyamatohru significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT yamamotohayato significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT yoneyamatakahiro significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT hashimotoyasuhiro significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy AT ohyamachikara significanceofpelviclymphnodedissectionduringradicalprostatectomyinhighriskprostatecancerpatientsreceivingneoadjuvantchemohormonaltherapy |