Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs), especially in the sacral region are frequent, costly, and increase morbidity and mortality of patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). These injuries can occur as a result of prolonged pressure and/or shear forces. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01029-1 |
_version_ | 1784725477002313728 |
---|---|
author | Baron, Miriam Viviane Silva, Paulo Eugênio Koepp, Janine Urbanetto, Janete de Souza Santamaria, Andres Felipe Mantilla dos Santos, Michele Paula de Mello Pinto, Marcus Vinicius Brandenburg, Cristine Reinheimer, Isabel Cristina Carvalho, Sonia Wagner, Mário Bernardes Miliou, Thomas Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercília |
author_facet | Baron, Miriam Viviane Silva, Paulo Eugênio Koepp, Janine Urbanetto, Janete de Souza Santamaria, Andres Felipe Mantilla dos Santos, Michele Paula de Mello Pinto, Marcus Vinicius Brandenburg, Cristine Reinheimer, Isabel Cristina Carvalho, Sonia Wagner, Mário Bernardes Miliou, Thomas Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercília |
author_sort | Baron, Miriam Viviane |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs), especially in the sacral region are frequent, costly, and increase morbidity and mortality of patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). These injuries can occur as a result of prolonged pressure and/or shear forces. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can increase muscle mass and improve local circulation, potentially reducing the incidence of PI. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of NMES in preventing PI in critically ill patients. We included patients with a period of less than 48 h in the ICU, aged ≥ 18 years. Participants were randomly selected (1:1 ratio) to receive NMES and usual care (NMES group) or only usual care (control group—CG) until discharge, death, or onset of a PI. To assess the effectiveness of NMES, we calculated the relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT). We assessed the muscle thickness of the gluteus maximus by ultrasonography. To assess safety, we analyzed the effects of NMES on vital signs and checked for the presence of skin burns in the stimulated areas. Clinical outcomes were assessed by time on mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality rate, and length of stay in the ICU. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 participants, 76 in the NMES group. PIs were present in 26 (35.6%) patients in the CG and 4 (5.3%) in the NMES group (p ˂ 0.001). The NMES group had an RR = 0.15 (95% CI 0.05–0.40) to develop a PI, NNT = 3.3 (95% CI 2.3–5.9). Moreover, the NMES group presented a shorter length of stay in the ICU: Δ = − 1.8 ± 1.2 days, p = 0.04. There was no significant difference in gluteus maximus thickness between groups (CG: Δ = − 0.37 ± 1.2 cm vs. NMES group: Δ = 0 ± 0.98 cm, p = 0.33). NMES did not promote deleterious changes in vital signs and we did not detect skin burns. CONCLUSIONS: NMES is an effective and safe therapy for the prevention of PI in critically ill patients and may reduce length of stay in the ICU. Trial registration RBR-8nt9m4. Registered prospectively on July 20th, 2018, https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8nt9m4 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9188909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91889092022-06-15 Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial Baron, Miriam Viviane Silva, Paulo Eugênio Koepp, Janine Urbanetto, Janete de Souza Santamaria, Andres Felipe Mantilla dos Santos, Michele Paula de Mello Pinto, Marcus Vinicius Brandenburg, Cristine Reinheimer, Isabel Cristina Carvalho, Sonia Wagner, Mário Bernardes Miliou, Thomas Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercília Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Pressure injuries (PIs), especially in the sacral region are frequent, costly, and increase morbidity and mortality of patients in an intensive care unit (ICU). These injuries can occur as a result of prolonged pressure and/or shear forces. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can increase muscle mass and improve local circulation, potentially reducing the incidence of PI. METHODS: We performed a randomized controlled trial to assess the efficacy and safety of NMES in preventing PI in critically ill patients. We included patients with a period of less than 48 h in the ICU, aged ≥ 18 years. Participants were randomly selected (1:1 ratio) to receive NMES and usual care (NMES group) or only usual care (control group—CG) until discharge, death, or onset of a PI. To assess the effectiveness of NMES, we calculated the relative risk (RR) and number needed to treat (NNT). We assessed the muscle thickness of the gluteus maximus by ultrasonography. To assess safety, we analyzed the effects of NMES on vital signs and checked for the presence of skin burns in the stimulated areas. Clinical outcomes were assessed by time on mechanical ventilation, ICU mortality rate, and length of stay in the ICU. RESULTS: We enrolled 149 participants, 76 in the NMES group. PIs were present in 26 (35.6%) patients in the CG and 4 (5.3%) in the NMES group (p ˂ 0.001). The NMES group had an RR = 0.15 (95% CI 0.05–0.40) to develop a PI, NNT = 3.3 (95% CI 2.3–5.9). Moreover, the NMES group presented a shorter length of stay in the ICU: Δ = − 1.8 ± 1.2 days, p = 0.04. There was no significant difference in gluteus maximus thickness between groups (CG: Δ = − 0.37 ± 1.2 cm vs. NMES group: Δ = 0 ± 0.98 cm, p = 0.33). NMES did not promote deleterious changes in vital signs and we did not detect skin burns. CONCLUSIONS: NMES is an effective and safe therapy for the prevention of PI in critically ill patients and may reduce length of stay in the ICU. Trial registration RBR-8nt9m4. Registered prospectively on July 20th, 2018, https://ensaiosclinicos.gov.br/rg/RBR-8nt9m4 Springer International Publishing 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9188909/ /pubmed/35695996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01029-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Baron, Miriam Viviane Silva, Paulo Eugênio Koepp, Janine Urbanetto, Janete de Souza Santamaria, Andres Felipe Mantilla dos Santos, Michele Paula de Mello Pinto, Marcus Vinicius Brandenburg, Cristine Reinheimer, Isabel Cristina Carvalho, Sonia Wagner, Mário Bernardes Miliou, Thomas Poli-de-Figueiredo, Carlos Eduardo Pinheiro da Costa, Bartira Ercília Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in the prevention of pressure injuries in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9188909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-022-01029-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baronmiriamviviane efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT silvapauloeugenio efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT koeppjanine efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT urbanettojanetedesouza efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT santamariaandresfelipemantilla efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT dossantosmichelepaula efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT demellopintomarcusvinicius efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT brandenburgcristine efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT reinheimerisabelcristina efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT carvalhosonia efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT wagnermariobernardes efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT miliouthomas efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT polidefigueiredocarloseduardo efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pinheirodacostabartiraercilia efficacyandsafetyofneuromuscularelectricalstimulationinthepreventionofpressureinjuriesincriticallyillpatientsarandomizedcontrolledtrial |