Cargando…

Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model

OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carruthers, Kathryn, Hannis, Dorothy, Robinson, Jonathan, Armstrong, Alan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003
_version_ 1784725526610444288
author Carruthers, Kathryn
Hannis, Dorothy
Robinson, Jonathan
Armstrong, Alan
author_facet Carruthers, Kathryn
Hannis, Dorothy
Robinson, Jonathan
Armstrong, Alan
author_sort Carruthers, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods. RESULTS: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189176
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91891762022-06-13 Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model Carruthers, Kathryn Hannis, Dorothy Robinson, Jonathan Armstrong, Alan J Neonatal Nurs Article OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods. RESULTS: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association. 2023-02 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9189176/ /pubmed/35722595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Carruthers, Kathryn
Hannis, Dorothy
Robinson, Jonathan
Armstrong, Alan
Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title_full Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title_fullStr Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title_short Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
title_sort effectiveness of a neonatal covid-19 response project: a mixed-methods evaluation using the donabedian model
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189176/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722595
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003
work_keys_str_mv AT carrutherskathryn effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel
AT hannisdorothy effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel
AT robinsonjonathan effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel
AT armstrongalan effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel