Cargando…
Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model
OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003 |
_version_ | 1784725526610444288 |
---|---|
author | Carruthers, Kathryn Hannis, Dorothy Robinson, Jonathan Armstrong, Alan |
author_facet | Carruthers, Kathryn Hannis, Dorothy Robinson, Jonathan Armstrong, Alan |
author_sort | Carruthers, Kathryn |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods. RESULTS: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9189176 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91891762022-06-13 Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model Carruthers, Kathryn Hannis, Dorothy Robinson, Jonathan Armstrong, Alan J Neonatal Nurs Article OBJECTIVE: This article outlines notable findings of a service evaluation of a COVID-19 response project, the Nurture Project (July 2020–March 2021). METHOD: The Donabedian structure-process-outcome model was used. Mixed-methods online surveys and organisational data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis and statistical analysis methods. RESULTS: Most staff and service users were satisfied with the project, reporting positive benefits to mental health, child development, and wellbeing. However, project outcome measures (Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale GAD-7 and the Patient Health Questionnaire PHQ-9) were statistically non-significant. CONCLUSION: Although the project was considered successful, recommendations for future service evaluation methods, outcome measurement, and future research are provided. The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Neonatal Nurses Association. 2023-02 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9189176/ /pubmed/35722595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003 Text en © 2022 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Carruthers, Kathryn Hannis, Dorothy Robinson, Jonathan Armstrong, Alan Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title | Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title_full | Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title_short | Effectiveness of a neonatal COVID-19 response project: A mixed-methods evaluation using the Donabedian model |
title_sort | effectiveness of a neonatal covid-19 response project: a mixed-methods evaluation using the donabedian model |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189176/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jnn.2022.06.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carrutherskathryn effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel AT hannisdorothy effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel AT robinsonjonathan effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel AT armstrongalan effectivenessofaneonatalcovid19responseprojectamixedmethodsevaluationusingthedonabedianmodel |