Cargando…
Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects o...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931 |
_version_ | 1784725534187454464 |
---|---|
author | Li, Xuejian Hu, Shenqiang Wang, Wanxia Tang, Bincheng Zheng, Cancai Hu, Jiwei Hu, Bo Li, Liang Liu, Hehe Wang, Jiwen |
author_facet | Li, Xuejian Hu, Shenqiang Wang, Wanxia Tang, Bincheng Zheng, Cancai Hu, Jiwei Hu, Bo Li, Liang Liu, Hehe Wang, Jiwen |
author_sort | Li, Xuejian |
collection | PubMed |
description | Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects of different rearing systems on goose intestinal functions and cecal microbial composition. Therefore, this study aimed to compare intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition differences in geese reared under CR and FR at 270 d of age. Histomorphological analysis showed that the ileal villus height (VH) to crypt depth (CD) ratio was significantly greater in CR than in FR (P < 0.001). Taxonomic analysis showed that the dominant bacteria of cecal microorganisms in both rearing systems were roughly similar, with Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, and Proteobacteria being the dominant phyla while Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, and uncultured_bacterium_o_Bacteroidales being the dominant genera. Differentially abundant taxa between CR and FR were also identified using Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 3.5). Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly enriched in the CR group at the genus level, while uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae and Sutterella were significantly enriched in the FR group. Notably, we found that the relative abundance of uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae was significantly negatively correlated with the ileal VH and VH/CD (P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly negatively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01), whereas that of Sutterella was significantly positively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that the lipid metabolism pathways of cecal microorganisms were lower enriched in CR than in FR. In conclusion, compared with FR, the CR significantly changed goose ileal histomorphological characteristics and cecal microbial composition, thereby affecting goose physiological functions and production performance. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9189207 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91892072022-06-14 Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition Li, Xuejian Hu, Shenqiang Wang, Wanxia Tang, Bincheng Zheng, Cancai Hu, Jiwei Hu, Bo Li, Liang Liu, Hehe Wang, Jiwen Poult Sci MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects of different rearing systems on goose intestinal functions and cecal microbial composition. Therefore, this study aimed to compare intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition differences in geese reared under CR and FR at 270 d of age. Histomorphological analysis showed that the ileal villus height (VH) to crypt depth (CD) ratio was significantly greater in CR than in FR (P < 0.001). Taxonomic analysis showed that the dominant bacteria of cecal microorganisms in both rearing systems were roughly similar, with Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, and Proteobacteria being the dominant phyla while Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, and uncultured_bacterium_o_Bacteroidales being the dominant genera. Differentially abundant taxa between CR and FR were also identified using Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 3.5). Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly enriched in the CR group at the genus level, while uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae and Sutterella were significantly enriched in the FR group. Notably, we found that the relative abundance of uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae was significantly negatively correlated with the ileal VH and VH/CD (P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly negatively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01), whereas that of Sutterella was significantly positively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that the lipid metabolism pathways of cecal microorganisms were lower enriched in CR than in FR. In conclusion, compared with FR, the CR significantly changed goose ileal histomorphological characteristics and cecal microbial composition, thereby affecting goose physiological functions and production performance. Elsevier 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9189207/ /pubmed/35679667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION Li, Xuejian Hu, Shenqiang Wang, Wanxia Tang, Bincheng Zheng, Cancai Hu, Jiwei Hu, Bo Li, Liang Liu, Hehe Wang, Jiwen Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title | Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title_full | Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title_fullStr | Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title_full_unstemmed | Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title_short | Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
title_sort | effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition |
topic | MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189207/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lixuejian effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT hushenqiang effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT wangwanxia effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT tangbincheng effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT zhengcancai effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT hujiwei effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT hubo effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT liliang effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT liuhehe effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition AT wangjiwen effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition |