Cargando…

Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition

Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xuejian, Hu, Shenqiang, Wang, Wanxia, Tang, Bincheng, Zheng, Cancai, Hu, Jiwei, Hu, Bo, Li, Liang, Liu, Hehe, Wang, Jiwen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931
_version_ 1784725534187454464
author Li, Xuejian
Hu, Shenqiang
Wang, Wanxia
Tang, Bincheng
Zheng, Cancai
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Bo
Li, Liang
Liu, Hehe
Wang, Jiwen
author_facet Li, Xuejian
Hu, Shenqiang
Wang, Wanxia
Tang, Bincheng
Zheng, Cancai
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Bo
Li, Liang
Liu, Hehe
Wang, Jiwen
author_sort Li, Xuejian
collection PubMed
description Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects of different rearing systems on goose intestinal functions and cecal microbial composition. Therefore, this study aimed to compare intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition differences in geese reared under CR and FR at 270 d of age. Histomorphological analysis showed that the ileal villus height (VH) to crypt depth (CD) ratio was significantly greater in CR than in FR (P < 0.001). Taxonomic analysis showed that the dominant bacteria of cecal microorganisms in both rearing systems were roughly similar, with Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, and Proteobacteria being the dominant phyla while Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, and uncultured_bacterium_o_Bacteroidales being the dominant genera. Differentially abundant taxa between CR and FR were also identified using Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 3.5). Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly enriched in the CR group at the genus level, while uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae and Sutterella were significantly enriched in the FR group. Notably, we found that the relative abundance of uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae was significantly negatively correlated with the ileal VH and VH/CD (P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly negatively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01), whereas that of Sutterella was significantly positively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that the lipid metabolism pathways of cecal microorganisms were lower enriched in CR than in FR. In conclusion, compared with FR, the CR significantly changed goose ileal histomorphological characteristics and cecal microbial composition, thereby affecting goose physiological functions and production performance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189207
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91892072022-06-14 Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition Li, Xuejian Hu, Shenqiang Wang, Wanxia Tang, Bincheng Zheng, Cancai Hu, Jiwei Hu, Bo Li, Liang Liu, Hehe Wang, Jiwen Poult Sci MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION Due to the demand for modern goose production and the pressure of environmental protection, the rearing systems of geese are changing from traditional waterside rearing to intensive rearing systems such as floor rearing (FR) and cage rearing (CR) systems. However, little is known about the effects of different rearing systems on goose intestinal functions and cecal microbial composition. Therefore, this study aimed to compare intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition differences in geese reared under CR and FR at 270 d of age. Histomorphological analysis showed that the ileal villus height (VH) to crypt depth (CD) ratio was significantly greater in CR than in FR (P < 0.001). Taxonomic analysis showed that the dominant bacteria of cecal microorganisms in both rearing systems were roughly similar, with Bacteroidota, Firmicutes, Fusobacteriota, and Proteobacteria being the dominant phyla while Bacteroides, Fusobacterium, and uncultured_bacterium_o_Bacteroidales being the dominant genera. Differentially abundant taxa between CR and FR were also identified using Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) analysis (P < 0.05, LDA score > 3.5). Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly enriched in the CR group at the genus level, while uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae and Sutterella were significantly enriched in the FR group. Notably, we found that the relative abundance of uncultured_bacterium_f_Rikenellaceae was significantly negatively correlated with the ileal VH and VH/CD (P < 0.05). The relative abundance of Megamonas and Anaerobiospirillum were significantly negatively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01), whereas that of Sutterella was significantly positively correlated with abdominal fat weight and relative abdominal fat weight (P < 0.01). Furthermore, PICRUSt2 analysis indicated that the lipid metabolism pathways of cecal microorganisms were lower enriched in CR than in FR. In conclusion, compared with FR, the CR significantly changed goose ileal histomorphological characteristics and cecal microbial composition, thereby affecting goose physiological functions and production performance. Elsevier 2022-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC9189207/ /pubmed/35679667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
Li, Xuejian
Hu, Shenqiang
Wang, Wanxia
Tang, Bincheng
Zheng, Cancai
Hu, Jiwei
Hu, Bo
Li, Liang
Liu, Hehe
Wang, Jiwen
Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title_full Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title_fullStr Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title_full_unstemmed Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title_short Effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
title_sort effects of cage versus floor rearing system on goose intestinal histomorphology and cecal microbial composition
topic MANAGEMENT AND PRODUCTION
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189207/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35679667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psj.2022.101931
work_keys_str_mv AT lixuejian effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT hushenqiang effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT wangwanxia effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT tangbincheng effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT zhengcancai effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT hujiwei effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT hubo effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT liliang effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT liuhehe effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition
AT wangjiwen effectsofcageversusfloorrearingsystemongooseintestinalhistomorphologyandcecalmicrobialcomposition