Cargando…

The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Although nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is very sensitive to radiotherapy, patients with advanced NPC still need concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The induction chemotherapy (IC) before CCRT can possiblly reduce the distant metastasis rate and improve the survival rate, but the result...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liu, Yun, Yang, Lu, Zhang, Shuang, Lin, Bing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AME Publishing Company 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706809
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-604
_version_ 1784725540320575488
author Liu, Yun
Yang, Lu
Zhang, Shuang
Lin, Bing
author_facet Liu, Yun
Yang, Lu
Zhang, Shuang
Lin, Bing
author_sort Liu, Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is very sensitive to radiotherapy, patients with advanced NPC still need concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The induction chemotherapy (IC) before CCRT can possiblly reduce the distant metastasis rate and improve the survival rate, but the results of studies varied. In this meta-analysis, we included controlled clinical studies to systematically evaluate the gain effect of it. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley online library, Elsevier, CNKI, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were electronically searched using keywords “neoadjuvant chemotherapy/induction chemotherapy” and “concurrent chemoradiotherapy” and “nasopharyngeal carcinoma” for articles from the date of establishment of the database to January, 2022. The inclusion criteria was established according to the PICOS principles. The complete response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were used as the main efficacy indicators for analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included with a total of 7,197 patients, including 3,764 patients who took IC + CCRT and 3,433 patients who received CCRT alone. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included had low risk of bias and 11 cohort studies had some concerns of risk. Meta-analysis showed that IC did not significantly increase the complete response rate [risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96–1.11, P=0.336], the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of IC as a prognostic factor predicting PFS was (HR =0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.96, P=0.214), and DMFS (HR =0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–0.96, P=0.004), and OS (HR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.73–0.92, P=0.036). IC increased the adverse effects experienced by patients (RR =1.22, 95% CI: 1.00–1.47, P=0.045). DISCUSSION: The use of IC before CCRT provided a good effect for NPC patients with tumor, node & metastasis (TNM) stages III and IV, but there was no significant gain for patients with stage II. In addition, the application of IC will increase the toxicity in the oral cavity, digestive tract, and bone marrow, and should be well considered about the toleration of patients. Due to the limitations of this study, more literatures with better quality are needed for further explore into this topic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189232
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher AME Publishing Company
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91892322022-06-14 The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis Liu, Yun Yang, Lu Zhang, Shuang Lin, Bing Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: Although nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is very sensitive to radiotherapy, patients with advanced NPC still need concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The induction chemotherapy (IC) before CCRT can possiblly reduce the distant metastasis rate and improve the survival rate, but the results of studies varied. In this meta-analysis, we included controlled clinical studies to systematically evaluate the gain effect of it. METHODS: The PubMed, Web of Science, Wiley online library, Elsevier, CNKI, and Clinicaltrials.gov databases were electronically searched using keywords “neoadjuvant chemotherapy/induction chemotherapy” and “concurrent chemoradiotherapy” and “nasopharyngeal carcinoma” for articles from the date of establishment of the database to January, 2022. The inclusion criteria was established according to the PICOS principles. The complete response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival (OS) were used as the main efficacy indicators for analysis. RESULTS: Thirteen articles were included with a total of 7,197 patients, including 3,764 patients who took IC + CCRT and 3,433 patients who received CCRT alone. Two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included had low risk of bias and 11 cohort studies had some concerns of risk. Meta-analysis showed that IC did not significantly increase the complete response rate [risk ratio (RR) =1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96–1.11, P=0.336], the pooled hazard ratio (HR) of IC as a prognostic factor predicting PFS was (HR =0.87, 95% CI: 0.78–0.96, P=0.214), and DMFS (HR =0.76, 95% CI: 0.57–0.96, P=0.004), and OS (HR =0.82, 95% CI: 0.73–0.92, P=0.036). IC increased the adverse effects experienced by patients (RR =1.22, 95% CI: 1.00–1.47, P=0.045). DISCUSSION: The use of IC before CCRT provided a good effect for NPC patients with tumor, node & metastasis (TNM) stages III and IV, but there was no significant gain for patients with stage II. In addition, the application of IC will increase the toxicity in the oral cavity, digestive tract, and bone marrow, and should be well considered about the toleration of patients. Due to the limitations of this study, more literatures with better quality are needed for further explore into this topic. AME Publishing Company 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9189232/ /pubmed/35706809 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-604 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Liu, Yun
Yang, Lu
Zhang, Shuang
Lin, Bing
The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title_full The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title_short The efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
title_sort efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with induction chemotherapy vs. concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a systematic-review and meta-analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189232/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706809
http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-604
work_keys_str_mv AT liuyun theefficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanglu theefficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangshuang theefficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linbing theefficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuyun efficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yanglu efficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangshuang efficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT linbing efficacyandsafetyofconcurrentchemoradiotherapywithinductionchemotherapyvsconcurrentchemoradiotherapyaloneforlocallyadvancednasopharyngealcarcinomaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis