Cargando…
Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: With advances in technology and medical treatment, laparoscopy is increasingly used in hepatic cyst surgery. We hope that the analysis the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in giant hepatic cyst surgery will provide a theoretical basis for the choice...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
AME Publishing Company
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706820 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-910 |
_version_ | 1784725543471546368 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Ai Cai, Chunping Fu, Qiurong Wang, Xiaoji |
author_facet | Chen, Ai Cai, Chunping Fu, Qiurong Wang, Xiaoji |
author_sort | Chen, Ai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: With advances in technology and medical treatment, laparoscopy is increasingly used in hepatic cyst surgery. We hope that the analysis the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in giant hepatic cyst surgery will provide a theoretical basis for the choice of treatment means for clinicians. METHODS: By searching CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang, VIP (China Science and Technology Journal Database), CBM (China Biology Medicine disc), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, all Chinese- and English-language articles on the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy for hepatic cysts were collected from database establishment to December 2021. Endnote X9 software was used for data checking and screening. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the relevant data. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess heterogeneity and funnel plots were used to detect bias in the results. RESULTS: A total of 43 relevant studies covering 3,375 patients with hepatic cysts were included: 1,733 patients in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group and 1,642 in the open hepatectomy group. Meta-analysis showed that the laparoscopic hepatectomy group had shorter operation time [standard mean difference (SMD) =–2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): –2.63 to –1.92, P<0.001], less intraoperative blood loss (SMD =–3.62, 95% CI: –4.22 to –3.02, P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD =–2.09, 95% CI: –2.41 to –1.78, P<0.001), faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery (SMD =–3.94, 95% CI: –4.68 to –3.20, P<0.001), and less postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) =0.45, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.58, P<0.001] than the open hepatectomy group, with significant statistical differences. Sensitivity analyses were largely centered, and it indicates that the results have a high stability. The funnel plot was left-right symmetrical. It indicates that the intervention group was better than the control group and the results were reliable. DISCUSSION: There are significant differences in the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy compared with open hepatectomy. Laparoscopic hepatectomy can be selected to reduce postoperative pain. There were few foreign studies included, so whether our results apply to European and American populations still needs further study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9189254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | AME Publishing Company |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91892542022-06-14 Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis Chen, Ai Cai, Chunping Fu, Qiurong Wang, Xiaoji Transl Cancer Res Original Article BACKGROUND: With advances in technology and medical treatment, laparoscopy is increasingly used in hepatic cyst surgery. We hope that the analysis the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy in giant hepatic cyst surgery will provide a theoretical basis for the choice of treatment means for clinicians. METHODS: By searching CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), Wanfang, VIP (China Science and Technology Journal Database), CBM (China Biology Medicine disc), PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases, all Chinese- and English-language articles on the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy and open hepatectomy for hepatic cysts were collected from database establishment to December 2021. Endnote X9 software was used for data checking and screening. Stata 15.1 software was used to analyze the relevant data. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess heterogeneity and funnel plots were used to detect bias in the results. RESULTS: A total of 43 relevant studies covering 3,375 patients with hepatic cysts were included: 1,733 patients in the laparoscopic hepatectomy group and 1,642 in the open hepatectomy group. Meta-analysis showed that the laparoscopic hepatectomy group had shorter operation time [standard mean difference (SMD) =–2.27, 95% confidence interval (CI): –2.63 to –1.92, P<0.001], less intraoperative blood loss (SMD =–3.62, 95% CI: –4.22 to –3.02, P<0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD =–2.09, 95% CI: –2.41 to –1.78, P<0.001), faster postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery (SMD =–3.94, 95% CI: –4.68 to –3.20, P<0.001), and less postoperative complications [odds ratio (OR) =0.45, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.58, P<0.001] than the open hepatectomy group, with significant statistical differences. Sensitivity analyses were largely centered, and it indicates that the results have a high stability. The funnel plot was left-right symmetrical. It indicates that the intervention group was better than the control group and the results were reliable. DISCUSSION: There are significant differences in the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy compared with open hepatectomy. Laparoscopic hepatectomy can be selected to reduce postoperative pain. There were few foreign studies included, so whether our results apply to European and American populations still needs further study. AME Publishing Company 2022-05 /pmc/articles/PMC9189254/ /pubmed/35706820 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-910 Text en 2022 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/Open Access Statement: This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits the non-commercial replication and distribution of the article with the strict proviso that no changes or edits are made and the original work is properly cited (including links to both the formal publication through the relevant DOI and the license). See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Chen, Ai Cai, Chunping Fu, Qiurong Wang, Xiaoji Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | safety and efficacy of laparoscopic hepatectomy versus open hepatectomy for giant hepatic cysts: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35706820 http://dx.doi.org/10.21037/tcr-22-910 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenai safetyandefficacyoflaparoscopichepatectomyversusopenhepatectomyforgianthepaticcystsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT caichunping safetyandefficacyoflaparoscopichepatectomyversusopenhepatectomyforgianthepaticcystsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT fuqiurong safetyandefficacyoflaparoscopichepatectomyversusopenhepatectomyforgianthepaticcystsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangxiaoji safetyandefficacyoflaparoscopichepatectomyversusopenhepatectomyforgianthepaticcystsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |