Cargando…

Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study

BACKGROUND: There are limited studies on the risk of secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We assessed the incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with CIRT for cervical cancer. We also evaluated the incidence of secondary cancers in patients who received standard photon...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nitta, Yuki, Murata, Hiroto, Okonogi, Noriyuki, Murata, Kazutoshi, Wakatsuki, Masaru, Karasawa, Kumiko, Kato, Shingo, Yamada, Shigeru, Nakano, Takashi, Tsuji, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4622
_version_ 1784725595205140480
author Nitta, Yuki
Murata, Hiroto
Okonogi, Noriyuki
Murata, Kazutoshi
Wakatsuki, Masaru
Karasawa, Kumiko
Kato, Shingo
Yamada, Shigeru
Nakano, Takashi
Tsuji, Hiroshi
author_facet Nitta, Yuki
Murata, Hiroto
Okonogi, Noriyuki
Murata, Kazutoshi
Wakatsuki, Masaru
Karasawa, Kumiko
Kato, Shingo
Yamada, Shigeru
Nakano, Takashi
Tsuji, Hiroshi
author_sort Nitta, Yuki
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are limited studies on the risk of secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We assessed the incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with CIRT for cervical cancer. We also evaluated the incidence of secondary cancers in patients who received standard photon radiotherapy (RT) throughout the same period. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with cervical cancer who underwent curative RT at our hospital. All cancers discovered for the first time after RT were classified as secondary cancers. To compare the risk of secondary cancers among cervical cancer survivors to the general population, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 197 and 417 patients in the CIRT and photon RT groups, respectively. The total person‐years during the observation period were 1052.4 in the CIRT group and 2481.5 in the photon RT group. The SIR for all secondary cancers was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–2.1) in the CIRT group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0–2.1) in the photon RT group. The 10‐year cumulative incidence of all secondary cancers was 9.5% (95% CI, 4.0–21.5) in the CIRT group and 9.4% (95% CI, 6.2–14.1) in the photon RT group. The CIRT and photon RT groups were not significantly different in incidence (p = 0.268). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of secondary cancers after CIRT for cervical cancer was similar to that after photon RT. Validation of our findings after long‐term observation is warranted.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91894632022-06-16 Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study Nitta, Yuki Murata, Hiroto Okonogi, Noriyuki Murata, Kazutoshi Wakatsuki, Masaru Karasawa, Kumiko Kato, Shingo Yamada, Shigeru Nakano, Takashi Tsuji, Hiroshi Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: There are limited studies on the risk of secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy (CIRT). We assessed the incidence of secondary cancers in patients treated with CIRT for cervical cancer. We also evaluated the incidence of secondary cancers in patients who received standard photon radiotherapy (RT) throughout the same period. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with cervical cancer who underwent curative RT at our hospital. All cancers discovered for the first time after RT were classified as secondary cancers. To compare the risk of secondary cancers among cervical cancer survivors to the general population, standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated. RESULTS: The analysis included a total of 197 and 417 patients in the CIRT and photon RT groups, respectively. The total person‐years during the observation period were 1052.4 in the CIRT group and 2481.5 in the photon RT group. The SIR for all secondary cancers was 1.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.6–2.1) in the CIRT group and 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0–2.1) in the photon RT group. The 10‐year cumulative incidence of all secondary cancers was 9.5% (95% CI, 4.0–21.5) in the CIRT group and 9.4% (95% CI, 6.2–14.1) in the photon RT group. The CIRT and photon RT groups were not significantly different in incidence (p = 0.268). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of secondary cancers after CIRT for cervical cancer was similar to that after photon RT. Validation of our findings after long‐term observation is warranted. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-23 /pmc/articles/PMC9189463/ /pubmed/35318825 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4622 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Nitta, Yuki
Murata, Hiroto
Okonogi, Noriyuki
Murata, Kazutoshi
Wakatsuki, Masaru
Karasawa, Kumiko
Kato, Shingo
Yamada, Shigeru
Nakano, Takashi
Tsuji, Hiroshi
Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title_full Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title_fullStr Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title_short Secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: A comparative study
title_sort secondary cancers after carbon‐ion radiotherapy and photon beam radiotherapy for uterine cervical cancer: a comparative study
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35318825
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.4622
work_keys_str_mv AT nittayuki secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT muratahiroto secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT okonoginoriyuki secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT muratakazutoshi secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT wakatsukimasaru secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT karasawakumiko secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT katoshingo secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT yamadashigeru secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT nakanotakashi secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy
AT tsujihiroshi secondarycancersaftercarbonionradiotherapyandphotonbeamradiotherapyforuterinecervicalcanceracomparativestudy