Cargando…
Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data
Globally, many wild deer populations are actively studied or managed for conservation, hunting, or damage mitigation purposes. These studies require reliable estimates of population state parameters, such as density or abundance, with a level of precision that is fit for purpose. Such estimates can...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyac016 |
_version_ | 1784725643200561152 |
---|---|
author | Bengsen, Andrew J Forsyth, David M Ramsey, Dave S L Amos, Matt Brennan, Michael Pople, Anthony R Comte, Sebastien Crittle, Troy |
author_facet | Bengsen, Andrew J Forsyth, David M Ramsey, Dave S L Amos, Matt Brennan, Michael Pople, Anthony R Comte, Sebastien Crittle, Troy |
author_sort | Bengsen, Andrew J |
collection | PubMed |
description | Globally, many wild deer populations are actively studied or managed for conservation, hunting, or damage mitigation purposes. These studies require reliable estimates of population state parameters, such as density or abundance, with a level of precision that is fit for purpose. Such estimates can be difficult to attain for many populations that occur in situations that are poorly suited to common survey methods. We evaluated the utility of combining camera trap survey data, in which a small proportion of the sample is individually recognizable using natural markings, with spatial mark–resight (SMR) models to estimate deer density in a variety of situations. We surveyed 13 deer populations comprising four deer species (Cervus unicolor, C. timorensis, C. elaphus, Dama dama) at nine widely separated sites, and used Bayesian SMR models to estimate population densities and abundances. Twelve surveys provided sufficient data for analysis and seven produced density estimates with coefficients of variation (CVs) ≤ 0.25. Estimated densities ranged from 0.3 to 24.6 deer km(−2). Camera trap surveys and SMR models provided a powerful and flexible approach for estimating deer densities in populations in which many detections were not individually identifiable, and they should provide useful density estimates under a wide range of conditions that are not amenable to more widely used methods. In the absence of specific local information on deer detectability and movement patterns, we recommend that at least 30 cameras be spaced at 500–1,000 m and set for 90 days. This approach could also be applied to large mammals other than deer. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9189690 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91896902022-06-14 Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data Bengsen, Andrew J Forsyth, David M Ramsey, Dave S L Amos, Matt Brennan, Michael Pople, Anthony R Comte, Sebastien Crittle, Troy J Mammal Feature Articles Globally, many wild deer populations are actively studied or managed for conservation, hunting, or damage mitigation purposes. These studies require reliable estimates of population state parameters, such as density or abundance, with a level of precision that is fit for purpose. Such estimates can be difficult to attain for many populations that occur in situations that are poorly suited to common survey methods. We evaluated the utility of combining camera trap survey data, in which a small proportion of the sample is individually recognizable using natural markings, with spatial mark–resight (SMR) models to estimate deer density in a variety of situations. We surveyed 13 deer populations comprising four deer species (Cervus unicolor, C. timorensis, C. elaphus, Dama dama) at nine widely separated sites, and used Bayesian SMR models to estimate population densities and abundances. Twelve surveys provided sufficient data for analysis and seven produced density estimates with coefficients of variation (CVs) ≤ 0.25. Estimated densities ranged from 0.3 to 24.6 deer km(−2). Camera trap surveys and SMR models provided a powerful and flexible approach for estimating deer densities in populations in which many detections were not individually identifiable, and they should provide useful density estimates under a wide range of conditions that are not amenable to more widely used methods. In the absence of specific local information on deer detectability and movement patterns, we recommend that at least 30 cameras be spaced at 500–1,000 m and set for 90 days. This approach could also be applied to large mammals other than deer. Oxford University Press 2022-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC9189690/ /pubmed/35707678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyac016 Text en © The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Mammalogists. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Feature Articles Bengsen, Andrew J Forsyth, David M Ramsey, Dave S L Amos, Matt Brennan, Michael Pople, Anthony R Comte, Sebastien Crittle, Troy Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title | Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title_full | Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title_fullStr | Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title_full_unstemmed | Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title_short | Estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
title_sort | estimating deer density and abundance using spatial mark–resight models with camera trap data |
topic | Feature Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189690/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707678 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyac016 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bengsenandrewj estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT forsythdavidm estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT ramseydavesl estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT amosmatt estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT brennanmichael estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT popleanthonyr estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT comtesebastien estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata AT crittletroy estimatingdeerdensityandabundanceusingspatialmarkresightmodelswithcameratrapdata |