Cargando…

A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions

BACKGROUND: The unrelated mean effects (UME) model has been proposed for evaluating the consistency assumption globally in the network of interventions. However, the UME model does not accommodate multiarm trials properly and omits comparisons between nonbaseline interventions in the multiarm trials...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Spineli, Loukia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34961377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211068005
_version_ 1784725650690539520
author Spineli, Loukia M.
author_facet Spineli, Loukia M.
author_sort Spineli, Loukia M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The unrelated mean effects (UME) model has been proposed for evaluating the consistency assumption globally in the network of interventions. However, the UME model does not accommodate multiarm trials properly and omits comparisons between nonbaseline interventions in the multiarm trials not investigated in 2-arm trials. METHODS: We proposed a refinement of the UME model that tackles the limitations mentioned above. We also accompanied the scatterplots on the posterior mean deviance contributions of the trial arms under the network meta-analysis (NMA) and UME models with Bland-Altman plots to detect outlying trials contributing to poor model fit. We applied the refined and original UME models to 2 networks with multiarm trials. RESULTS: The original UME model omitted more than 20% of the observed comparisons in both networks. The thorough inspection of the individual data points’ deviance contribution using complementary plots in conjunction with the measures of model fit and the estimated between-trial variance indicated that the refined and original UME models revealed possible inconsistency in both examples. CONCLUSIONS: The refined UME model allows proper accommodation of the multiarm trials and visualization of all observed evidence in complex networks of interventions. Furthermore, considering several complementary plots to investigate deviance helps draw informed conclusions on the possibility of global inconsistency in the network. HIGHLIGHTS: We have refined the unrelated mean effects (UME) model to incorporate multiarm trials properly and to estimate all observed comparisons in complex networks of interventions. Forest plots with posterior summaries of all observed comparisons under the network meta-analysis and refined UME model can uncover the consequences of potential inconsistency in the network. Using complementary plots to investigate the individual data points’ deviance contribution in conjunction with model fit measures and estimated heterogeneity aid in detecting possible inconsistency.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91897232022-06-14 A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions Spineli, Loukia M. Med Decis Making Original Research Articles BACKGROUND: The unrelated mean effects (UME) model has been proposed for evaluating the consistency assumption globally in the network of interventions. However, the UME model does not accommodate multiarm trials properly and omits comparisons between nonbaseline interventions in the multiarm trials not investigated in 2-arm trials. METHODS: We proposed a refinement of the UME model that tackles the limitations mentioned above. We also accompanied the scatterplots on the posterior mean deviance contributions of the trial arms under the network meta-analysis (NMA) and UME models with Bland-Altman plots to detect outlying trials contributing to poor model fit. We applied the refined and original UME models to 2 networks with multiarm trials. RESULTS: The original UME model omitted more than 20% of the observed comparisons in both networks. The thorough inspection of the individual data points’ deviance contribution using complementary plots in conjunction with the measures of model fit and the estimated between-trial variance indicated that the refined and original UME models revealed possible inconsistency in both examples. CONCLUSIONS: The refined UME model allows proper accommodation of the multiarm trials and visualization of all observed evidence in complex networks of interventions. Furthermore, considering several complementary plots to investigate deviance helps draw informed conclusions on the possibility of global inconsistency in the network. HIGHLIGHTS: We have refined the unrelated mean effects (UME) model to incorporate multiarm trials properly and to estimate all observed comparisons in complex networks of interventions. Forest plots with posterior summaries of all observed comparisons under the network meta-analysis and refined UME model can uncover the consequences of potential inconsistency in the network. Using complementary plots to investigate the individual data points’ deviance contribution in conjunction with model fit measures and estimated heterogeneity aid in detecting possible inconsistency. SAGE Publications 2021-12-27 2022-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9189723/ /pubmed/34961377 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211068005 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research Articles
Spineli, Loukia M.
A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title_full A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title_fullStr A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title_full_unstemmed A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title_short A Revised Framework to Evaluate the Consistency Assumption Globally in a Network of Interventions
title_sort revised framework to evaluate the consistency assumption globally in a network of interventions
topic Original Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34961377
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272989X211068005
work_keys_str_mv AT spineliloukiam arevisedframeworktoevaluatetheconsistencyassumptiongloballyinanetworkofinterventions
AT spineliloukiam revisedframeworktoevaluatetheconsistencyassumptiongloballyinanetworkofinterventions