Cargando…

Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study

OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Phillips, Mark R, Sadeghirad, Behnam, Busse, Jason W, Brignardello-Petersen, Romina, Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A, Kenji Nampo, Fernando, Guo, Yu Jia, Bzovsky, Sofia, Bannuru, Raveendhara R, Thabane, Lehana, Bhandari, Mohit, Guyatt, Gordon H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400
_version_ 1784725674282450944
author Phillips, Mark R
Sadeghirad, Behnam
Busse, Jason W
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guo, Yu Jia
Bzovsky, Sofia
Bannuru, Raveendhara R
Thabane, Lehana
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon H
author_facet Phillips, Mark R
Sadeghirad, Behnam
Busse, Jason W
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guo, Yu Jia
Bzovsky, Sofia
Bannuru, Raveendhara R
Thabane, Lehana
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon H
author_sort Phillips, Mark R
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: 26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format. RESULTS: To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation. CONCLUSION: Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9189833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91898332022-06-16 Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study Phillips, Mark R Sadeghirad, Behnam Busse, Jason W Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guo, Yu Jia Bzovsky, Sofia Bannuru, Raveendhara R Thabane, Lehana Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon H BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: 26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format. RESULTS: To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation. CONCLUSION: Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9189833/ /pubmed/35688599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Methods
Phillips, Mark R
Sadeghirad, Behnam
Busse, Jason W
Brignardello-Petersen, Romina
Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A
Kenji Nampo, Fernando
Guo, Yu Jia
Bzovsky, Sofia
Bannuru, Raveendhara R
Thabane, Lehana
Bhandari, Mohit
Guyatt, Gordon H
Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title_fullStr Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title_full_unstemmed Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title_short Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
title_sort development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
topic Research Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688599
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400
work_keys_str_mv AT phillipsmarkr developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT sadeghiradbehnam developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT bussejasonw developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT brignardellopetersenromina developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT cuellogarciacarlosa developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT kenjinampofernando developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT guoyujia developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT bzovskysofia developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT bannururaveendharar developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT thabanelehana developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT bhandarimohit developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy
AT guyattgordonh developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy