Cargando…
Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study
OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400 |
_version_ | 1784725674282450944 |
---|---|
author | Phillips, Mark R Sadeghirad, Behnam Busse, Jason W Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guo, Yu Jia Bzovsky, Sofia Bannuru, Raveendhara R Thabane, Lehana Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon H |
author_facet | Phillips, Mark R Sadeghirad, Behnam Busse, Jason W Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guo, Yu Jia Bzovsky, Sofia Bannuru, Raveendhara R Thabane, Lehana Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon H |
author_sort | Phillips, Mark R |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: 26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format. RESULTS: To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation. CONCLUSION: Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9189833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91898332022-06-16 Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study Phillips, Mark R Sadeghirad, Behnam Busse, Jason W Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guo, Yu Jia Bzovsky, Sofia Bannuru, Raveendhara R Thabane, Lehana Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon H BMJ Open Research Methods OBJECTIVE: The Grades of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation working group recently developed an innovative approach to interpreting results from network meta-analyses (NMA) through minimally and partially contextualised methods; however, the optimal method for presenting results for multiple outcomes using this approach remains uncertain. We; therefore, developed and iteratively modified a presentation method that effectively summarises NMA results of multiple outcomes for clinicians using this new interpretation approach. DESIGN: Qualitative descriptive study. SETTING: A steering group of seven individuals with experience in NMA and design validation studies developed two colour-coded presentation formats for evaluation. Through an iterative process, we assessed the validity of both formats to maximise their clarity and ease of interpretation. PARTICIPANTS: 26 participants including 20 clinicians who routinely provide patient care, 3 research staff/research methodologists and 3 residents. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Two team members used qualitative content analysis to independently analyse transcripts of all interviews. The steering group reviewed the analyses and responded with serial modifications of the presentation format. RESULTS: To ensure that readers could easily discern the benefits and safety of each included treatment across all assessed outcomes, participants primarily focused on simple information presentations, with intuitive organisational decisions and colour coding. Feedback ultimately resulted in two presentation versions, each preferred by a substantial group of participants, and development of a legend to facilitate interpretation. CONCLUSION: Iterative design validation facilitated the development of two novel formats for presenting minimally or partially contextualised NMA results for multiple outcomes. These presentation approaches appeal to audiences that include clinicians with limited familiarity with NMAs. BMJ Publishing Group 2022-06-09 /pmc/articles/PMC9189833/ /pubmed/35688599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Methods Phillips, Mark R Sadeghirad, Behnam Busse, Jason W Brignardello-Petersen, Romina Cuello-Garcia, Carlos A Kenji Nampo, Fernando Guo, Yu Jia Bzovsky, Sofia Bannuru, Raveendhara R Thabane, Lehana Bhandari, Mohit Guyatt, Gordon H Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title | Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_full | Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_fullStr | Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_short | Development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
title_sort | development and design validation of a novel network meta-analysis presentation tool for multiple outcomes: a qualitative descriptive study |
topic | Research Methods |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9189833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35688599 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056400 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT phillipsmarkr developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT sadeghiradbehnam developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT bussejasonw developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT brignardellopetersenromina developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT cuellogarciacarlosa developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT kenjinampofernando developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT guoyujia developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT bzovskysofia developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT bannururaveendharar developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT thabanelehana developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT bhandarimohit developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy AT guyattgordonh developmentanddesignvalidationofanovelnetworkmetaanalysispresentationtoolformultipleoutcomesaqualitativedescriptivestudy |