Cargando…

COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors

BACKGROUND: Immunizations for emergency medical services (EMS) professionals during pandemics are an important tool to increase the safety of the workforce as well as their patients. The purpose of this study was to better understand EMS professionals’ decisions to receive or decline a COVID-19 vacc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gregory, Megan E., Powell, Jonathan R., MacEwan, Sarah R., Kurth, Jordan D., Kenah, Eben, Panchal, Ashish R., McAlearney, Ann Scheck
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2021.1993391
_version_ 1784725712025944064
author Gregory, Megan E.
Powell, Jonathan R.
MacEwan, Sarah R.
Kurth, Jordan D.
Kenah, Eben
Panchal, Ashish R.
McAlearney, Ann Scheck
author_facet Gregory, Megan E.
Powell, Jonathan R.
MacEwan, Sarah R.
Kurth, Jordan D.
Kenah, Eben
Panchal, Ashish R.
McAlearney, Ann Scheck
author_sort Gregory, Megan E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Immunizations for emergency medical services (EMS) professionals during pandemics are an important tool to increase the safety of the workforce as well as their patients. The purpose of this study was to better understand EMS professionals’ decisions to receive or decline a COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally certified EMS professionals (18–85 years) in April 2021. Participants received an electronic survey asking whether they received a vaccine, why or why not, and their associated beliefs using three validated scales: perceived risk of COVID-19, medical mistrust, and confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine. Data were merged with National Registry dataset demographics. Analyses included descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression (OR, 95% CI). Multivariate imputation by chained equations was used for missingness. RESULTS: A total of 2,584 respondents satisfied inclusion criteria (response rate = 14%). Overall, 70% of EMS professionals were vaccinated. Common reasons for vaccination among vaccinated respondents were to protect oneself (76%) and others (73%). Common reasons for non-vaccination among non-vaccinated respondents included concerns about vaccine safety (53%) and beliefs that vaccination was not necessary (39%). Most who had not received the vaccine did not plan to get it in the future (84%). Hesitation was most frequently related to wanting to see how the vaccine was working for others (55%). Odds of COVID-19 vaccination were associated with demographics including age (referent <28 years; 39–50 years: 1.56, 1.17–2.08; >51 years: 2.22, 1.64–3.01), male sex (1.26, 1.01–1.58), residing in an urban/suburban area (referent rural; 1.36, 1.08–1.70), advanced education (referent GED/high school and below; bachelor’s and above: 1.72, 1.19–2.47), and working at a hospital (referent fire-based agency; 1.53, 1.04–2.24). Additionally, vaccination odds were significantly higher with greater perceived risk of COVID-19 (2.05, 1.68–2.50), and higher vaccine confidence (2.84, 2.40–3.36). Odds of vaccination were significantly lower with higher medical mistrust (0.54, 0.46–0.63). CONCLUSION: Despite vaccine availability, not all EMS professionals had been vaccinated. The decision to receive a COVID-19 vaccine was associated with demographics, beliefs regarding COVID-19 and the vaccine, and medical mistrust. Efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates should emphasize the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9190028
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91900282022-09-06 COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors Gregory, Megan E. Powell, Jonathan R. MacEwan, Sarah R. Kurth, Jordan D. Kenah, Eben Panchal, Ashish R. McAlearney, Ann Scheck Prehosp Emerg Care Article BACKGROUND: Immunizations for emergency medical services (EMS) professionals during pandemics are an important tool to increase the safety of the workforce as well as their patients. The purpose of this study was to better understand EMS professionals’ decisions to receive or decline a COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of nationally certified EMS professionals (18–85 years) in April 2021. Participants received an electronic survey asking whether they received a vaccine, why or why not, and their associated beliefs using three validated scales: perceived risk of COVID-19, medical mistrust, and confidence in the COVID-19 vaccine. Data were merged with National Registry dataset demographics. Analyses included descriptive analysis and multivariable logistic regression (OR, 95% CI). Multivariate imputation by chained equations was used for missingness. RESULTS: A total of 2,584 respondents satisfied inclusion criteria (response rate = 14%). Overall, 70% of EMS professionals were vaccinated. Common reasons for vaccination among vaccinated respondents were to protect oneself (76%) and others (73%). Common reasons for non-vaccination among non-vaccinated respondents included concerns about vaccine safety (53%) and beliefs that vaccination was not necessary (39%). Most who had not received the vaccine did not plan to get it in the future (84%). Hesitation was most frequently related to wanting to see how the vaccine was working for others (55%). Odds of COVID-19 vaccination were associated with demographics including age (referent <28 years; 39–50 years: 1.56, 1.17–2.08; >51 years: 2.22, 1.64–3.01), male sex (1.26, 1.01–1.58), residing in an urban/suburban area (referent rural; 1.36, 1.08–1.70), advanced education (referent GED/high school and below; bachelor’s and above: 1.72, 1.19–2.47), and working at a hospital (referent fire-based agency; 1.53, 1.04–2.24). Additionally, vaccination odds were significantly higher with greater perceived risk of COVID-19 (2.05, 1.68–2.50), and higher vaccine confidence (2.84, 2.40–3.36). Odds of vaccination were significantly lower with higher medical mistrust (0.54, 0.46–0.63). CONCLUSION: Despite vaccine availability, not all EMS professionals had been vaccinated. The decision to receive a COVID-19 vaccine was associated with demographics, beliefs regarding COVID-19 and the vaccine, and medical mistrust. Efforts to increase COVID-19 vaccination rates should emphasize the safety and efficacy of vaccines. 2022 2021-11-03 /pmc/articles/PMC9190028/ /pubmed/34644239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2021.1993391 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) ), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
spellingShingle Article
Gregory, Megan E.
Powell, Jonathan R.
MacEwan, Sarah R.
Kurth, Jordan D.
Kenah, Eben
Panchal, Ashish R.
McAlearney, Ann Scheck
COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title_full COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title_fullStr COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title_short COVID-19 Vaccinations in EMS Professionals: Prevalence and Predictors
title_sort covid-19 vaccinations in ems professionals: prevalence and predictors
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190028/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34644239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10903127.2021.1993391
work_keys_str_mv AT gregorymegane covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT powelljonathanr covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT macewansarahr covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT kurthjordand covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT kenaheben covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT panchalashishr covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors
AT mcalearneyannscheck covid19vaccinationsinemsprofessionalsprevalenceandpredictors