Cargando…

Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?

BACKGROUND: Since 2014, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), which performs health technology assessments for all federal, provincial and territorial government drug programs (except Quebec’s) and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), which conducts price nego...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Rawson, Nigel S. B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35698235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x
_version_ 1784725722376437760
author Rawson, Nigel S. B.
author_facet Rawson, Nigel S. B.
author_sort Rawson, Nigel S. B.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since 2014, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), which performs health technology assessments for all federal, provincial and territorial government drug programs (except Quebec’s) and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), which conducts price negotiations with manufacturers for all government drug programs, have been aligning their processes. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in CADTH recommendations for non-oncology drugs for rare disorders (DRDs) released between 2014 and 2021, results of pCPA negotiations for the same drugs, and listings in government drug plans to assess who benefits from the alignment. RESULTS: Recommendations were positive in 87% of the reviews, although all included clinical criteria for use and/or economic conditions. Almost 90% of the DRDs with a positive recommendation had a successful price negotiation and 71% of those with a negative recommendation had no negotiation. Although no recommendation published before mid-2016 had a specified price reduction, almost 95% of those issued afterwards included the price reduction required to achieve a specific low cost-effectiveness threshold. The median time between the DRDs receiving marketing approval and a completed price negotiation was 663 days. Negotiations for DRDs completed after 2017 generally had fewer listings in government drug plans, but there was no distinct trend. The drug’s price likely played a role in listing decisions. When DRDs were listed, drug plans had access criteria consistent with CADTH’s or stronger for all the DRDs. CONCLUSIONS: The governments who own, fund and manage CADTH and the pCPA benefit from their alignment. The alignment is less beneficial for patients waiting for access to the DRDs. The time taken by CADTH and pCPA actions and individual government drug plans to make listing decisions delays access. CADTH’s clinical criteria have become more extensive and are applied rigorously by drug plans which restricts patient access to DRDs. Canadians with rare disorders urgently need their governments to implement a long-overdue, comprehensive rare disease strategy to ensure DRDs are reviewed and reimbursed quickly and equitably to provide adequate health care to all who need them.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9190095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91900952022-06-14 Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits? Rawson, Nigel S. B. Orphanet J Rare Dis Research BACKGROUND: Since 2014, the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), which performs health technology assessments for all federal, provincial and territorial government drug programs (except Quebec’s) and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA), which conducts price negotiations with manufacturers for all government drug programs, have been aligning their processes. OBJECTIVE: To examine trends in CADTH recommendations for non-oncology drugs for rare disorders (DRDs) released between 2014 and 2021, results of pCPA negotiations for the same drugs, and listings in government drug plans to assess who benefits from the alignment. RESULTS: Recommendations were positive in 87% of the reviews, although all included clinical criteria for use and/or economic conditions. Almost 90% of the DRDs with a positive recommendation had a successful price negotiation and 71% of those with a negative recommendation had no negotiation. Although no recommendation published before mid-2016 had a specified price reduction, almost 95% of those issued afterwards included the price reduction required to achieve a specific low cost-effectiveness threshold. The median time between the DRDs receiving marketing approval and a completed price negotiation was 663 days. Negotiations for DRDs completed after 2017 generally had fewer listings in government drug plans, but there was no distinct trend. The drug’s price likely played a role in listing decisions. When DRDs were listed, drug plans had access criteria consistent with CADTH’s or stronger for all the DRDs. CONCLUSIONS: The governments who own, fund and manage CADTH and the pCPA benefit from their alignment. The alignment is less beneficial for patients waiting for access to the DRDs. The time taken by CADTH and pCPA actions and individual government drug plans to make listing decisions delays access. CADTH’s clinical criteria have become more extensive and are applied rigorously by drug plans which restricts patient access to DRDs. Canadians with rare disorders urgently need their governments to implement a long-overdue, comprehensive rare disease strategy to ensure DRDs are reviewed and reimbursed quickly and equitably to provide adequate health care to all who need them. BioMed Central 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9190095/ /pubmed/35698235 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rawson, Nigel S. B.
Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title_full Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title_fullStr Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title_full_unstemmed Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title_short Health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in Canada: Who benefits?
title_sort health technology assessment and price negotiation alignment for rare disorder drugs in canada: who benefits?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35698235
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13023-022-02390-x
work_keys_str_mv AT rawsonnigelsb healthtechnologyassessmentandpricenegotiationalignmentforraredisorderdrugsincanadawhobenefits