Cargando…
Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic
OBJECTIVES: Healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide have and are using personal protective equipment (PPE) as COVID-19 prevention measures, including gloves, gowns, goggles, masks and hand hygiene. Although several reviews have been published on the effectiveness of PPE, these often include studies on o...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100280 |
_version_ | 1784725739189305344 |
---|---|
author | Schoberer, Daniela Osmancevic, Selvedina Reiter, Lea Thonhofer, Nina Hoedl, Manuela |
author_facet | Schoberer, Daniela Osmancevic, Selvedina Reiter, Lea Thonhofer, Nina Hoedl, Manuela |
author_sort | Schoberer, Daniela |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide have and are using personal protective equipment (PPE) as COVID-19 prevention measures, including gloves, gowns, goggles, masks and hand hygiene. Although several reviews have been published on the effectiveness of PPE, these often include studies on other inflectional diseases. This is problematic, because these diseases differ with regard to, e.g. the transmissibility and viral loads in the days after infection. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness of PPE to protect HCWs from COVID-19 infections. DESIGN: Rapid review of literature. METHODS: We followed a practical guide to conduct the rapid review based on a protocol established by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Meta-analyses have been conducted to synthesize the results. The confidence in the evidence was determined using the GRADE method. RESULTS: We found 461 reviews and 208 primary studies, of which 16 systematic reviews included 11 observational studies of interest. Wearing PPE conferred significant protection against infection with COVID-19 as opposed to not wearing adequate PPE. Overall, the review results show that wearing face masks can significantly protect HCWs from infection. We found no effects for wearing gloves and gowns. Practicing thorough hand hygiene and having proper PPE, as compared to lacking proper PPE, showed a protective but not statistically significant effect. No studies reported the side effects of wearing PPE or acceptance rates. CONCLUSION: This evidence supports PPE use by HCW, and especially N95 masks, to reduce the risk of a COVID-19 infection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9190185 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91901852022-06-13 Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic Schoberer, Daniela Osmancevic, Selvedina Reiter, Lea Thonhofer, Nina Hoedl, Manuela Public Health Pract (Oxf) Review Article OBJECTIVES: Healthcare workers (HCWs) worldwide have and are using personal protective equipment (PPE) as COVID-19 prevention measures, including gloves, gowns, goggles, masks and hand hygiene. Although several reviews have been published on the effectiveness of PPE, these often include studies on other inflectional diseases. This is problematic, because these diseases differ with regard to, e.g. the transmissibility and viral loads in the days after infection. Therefore, we assessed the effectiveness of PPE to protect HCWs from COVID-19 infections. DESIGN: Rapid review of literature. METHODS: We followed a practical guide to conduct the rapid review based on a protocol established by the Cochrane Rapid Reviews Methods Group. Meta-analyses have been conducted to synthesize the results. The confidence in the evidence was determined using the GRADE method. RESULTS: We found 461 reviews and 208 primary studies, of which 16 systematic reviews included 11 observational studies of interest. Wearing PPE conferred significant protection against infection with COVID-19 as opposed to not wearing adequate PPE. Overall, the review results show that wearing face masks can significantly protect HCWs from infection. We found no effects for wearing gloves and gowns. Practicing thorough hand hygiene and having proper PPE, as compared to lacking proper PPE, showed a protective but not statistically significant effect. No studies reported the side effects of wearing PPE or acceptance rates. CONCLUSION: This evidence supports PPE use by HCW, and especially N95 masks, to reduce the risk of a COVID-19 infection. Elsevier 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9190185/ /pubmed/35722539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100280 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Article Schoberer, Daniela Osmancevic, Selvedina Reiter, Lea Thonhofer, Nina Hoedl, Manuela Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title | Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full | Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_fullStr | Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_full_unstemmed | Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_short | Rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic |
title_sort | rapid review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of personal protective equipment for healthcare workers during the covid-19 pandemic |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9190185/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35722539 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2022.100280 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT schobererdaniela rapidreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectivenessofpersonalprotectiveequipmentforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic AT osmancevicselvedina rapidreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectivenessofpersonalprotectiveequipmentforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic AT reiterlea rapidreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectivenessofpersonalprotectiveequipmentforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic AT thonhofernina rapidreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectivenessofpersonalprotectiveequipmentforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic AT hoedlmanuela rapidreviewandmetaanalysisoftheeffectivenessofpersonalprotectiveequipmentforhealthcareworkersduringthecovid19pandemic |