Fertility-preserving treatment in patients with early-stage endometrial cancer: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Endometrial cancer (EC) is the second most common malignancy of the female reproductive system worldwide, and the standard treatment for early-stage EC potentially leads to permanent infertility. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacies of different methods on fertility preservation in patients with early-stage EC. METHODS: We searched the major online databases (PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to collect the research literature on fertility preservation therapy in patients with early-stage well-differentiated EC aged ≤ 40 years from January 1999 to October 2019. The inclusion was performed using the R software (version R3.5.3) meta-analysis of a single rate. The efficacy of the following three fertility preservation treatments was evaluated from four aspects, the complete remission rate (CRR), recurrence rate (ReR), pregnancy rate (PregR), and live birth rate (LBR): a) taking oral progestin only therapy, b) hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS)/GnRH-a, c) LNG-IUS or combined with progestin/GnRH-a. RESULTS: A total of 23 articles were included in this study, including 446 patients with early-stage EC. In the group that took oral progestin only (n = 279), CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR were 82% (95% confidence interval [CI], 74%–92%, P = .01), 38% (95% CI, 31%-45%, P = .35), 70% (95% CI, 62%–79%, P = .68), and 63% (95% CI, 55%–73%, P = .55), respectively. Hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/LNG-IUS/GnRH-a therapy group (n = 96) achieved a CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR of 95% (95% CI, 90%–100%, P = .42), 16% (95% CI, 6%–39%, P = .03), 84% (95% CI, 73%–96%, P = .39), and 72% (95% CI, 59%–87%, P = .28), respectively. LNG-IUS or combined with progestin/GnRH-a therapy group (n = 91) achieved a CRR, ReR, PregR, and LBR of 69% (95% CI, 54%–89%, P < .01), 30% (95% CI, 19%–49%, P = .36), 48% (95% CI, 18%–100%, P < .01), and 36% (95% CI, 10%–100%, P < .01), respectively. CONCLUSION: It is safe and effective for young patients with early-stage EC to receive oral progestin, hysteroscopic resection combined with progestin/LNG-IUS/GnRH-a, LNG-IUS, or progestin/GnRH-a. INPLASY REGISTRATION NUMBER: DOI 10.37766/inplasy2020.12.0137