Cargando…
Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens
BACKGROUND: It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1915458 |
_version_ | 1784726193843470336 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Junbo Wang, Yining Deng, Jiangshan Qi, Miao Zuo, Wei Hao, Yuanzheng Wang, Anjiang Tu, Yi Xu, Shan Zhou, Xiaodong Zhou, Xiaojiang Li, Guohua Zhu, Liang Shu, Xu Zhu, Yin Lv, Nonghua Chen, Youxiang |
author_facet | Hong, Junbo Wang, Yining Deng, Jiangshan Qi, Miao Zuo, Wei Hao, Yuanzheng Wang, Anjiang Tu, Yi Xu, Shan Zhou, Xiaodong Zhou, Xiaojiang Li, Guohua Zhu, Liang Shu, Xu Zhu, Yin Lv, Nonghua Chen, Youxiang |
author_sort | Hong, Junbo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens. METHODS: A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology. RESULTS: The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; p < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; p < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; p = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; p < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; p < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; p = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; p < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies. CONCLUSION: NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9192244 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91922442022-06-14 Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens Hong, Junbo Wang, Yining Deng, Jiangshan Qi, Miao Zuo, Wei Hao, Yuanzheng Wang, Anjiang Tu, Yi Xu, Shan Zhou, Xiaodong Zhou, Xiaojiang Li, Guohua Zhu, Liang Shu, Xu Zhu, Yin Lv, Nonghua Chen, Youxiang Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: It was gradually accepted that endoscopic fragment biopsy (EFB) diagnosis cannot accurately guarantee the absence of higher-grade neoplasms within the lesion of the digestive tract. There are no well-established predictors for histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between EFB diagnosing colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and endoscopic resection (ER) specimens. METHODS: A total of 918 colorectal LGINs was histopathologically diagnosed by EFB, including 162 cases with upgrade discrepancy and 756 concordant cases. We compared clinicopathological data of EFB and ER specimens between these two groups. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify predictors for this upgrade histopathology. RESULTS: The predominant upgrade discrepancy of LGINs diagnosed by EFB was upgrades to high-grade dysplasia (114/918, 12.4%), followed by upgrades to intramucosal carcinoma (33/918, 3.6%), submucosal adenocarcinoma (10/918, 1.1%), and advanced adenocarcinoma (5/918, 0.5%). NSAID history (OR 4.83; 95% CI, 2.27-10.27; p < 0.001), insufficient EFB number (OR 2.99; 95% CI, 1.91-4.68; p < 0.001), maximum diameter ≥ 1.0 cm (OR 6.18; 95% CI, 1.32-28.99; p = 0.021), lobulated shape (OR 2.68; 95% CI, 1.65-4.36; p < 0.001), erythema (OR 2.42; 95% CI, 1.50-3.91; p < 0.001), erosion (OR 7.12; 95% CI, 3.91-12.94; p < 0.001), surface unevenness (OR 2.31; 95% CI, 1.33-4.01; p = 0.003), and distal location of the target adenoma (OR 3.29; 95% CI, 1.68-6.41; p < 0.001) were associated with the histologically upgrade discrepancies. CONCLUSION: NSAID history, insufficient EFB number, adenoma size and location, and abnormal macroscopic patterns are potential predictors for upgrade histopathology of LGINs diagnosed by EFBs. The standardization of EFB number and advanced imaging techniques could minimize the risk of neglecting the potential of this upgrade histopathology. Hindawi 2022-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC9192244/ /pubmed/35707387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1915458 Text en Copyright © 2022 Junbo Hong et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hong, Junbo Wang, Yining Deng, Jiangshan Qi, Miao Zuo, Wei Hao, Yuanzheng Wang, Anjiang Tu, Yi Xu, Shan Zhou, Xiaodong Zhou, Xiaojiang Li, Guohua Zhu, Liang Shu, Xu Zhu, Yin Lv, Nonghua Chen, Youxiang Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title | Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title_full | Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title_fullStr | Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title_short | Potential Factors Predicting Histopathologically Upgrade Discrepancies between Endoscopic Forceps Biopsy of the Colorectal Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Endoscopic Resection Specimens |
title_sort | potential factors predicting histopathologically upgrade discrepancies between endoscopic forceps biopsy of the colorectal low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia and endoscopic resection specimens |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192244/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35707387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2022/1915458 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongjunbo potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT wangyining potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT dengjiangshan potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT qimiao potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT zuowei potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT haoyuanzheng potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT wanganjiang potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT tuyi potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT xushan potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT zhouxiaodong potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT zhouxiaojiang potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT liguohua potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT zhuliang potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT shuxu potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT zhuyin potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT lvnonghua potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens AT chenyouxiang potentialfactorspredictinghistopathologicallyupgradediscrepanciesbetweenendoscopicforcepsbiopsyofthecolorectallowgradeintraepithelialneoplasiaandendoscopicresectionspecimens |