Cargando…
Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1 |
_version_ | 1784726242719694848 |
---|---|
author | Laubach, Markus Bläsius, Felix M. Volland, Ruth Knobe, Matthias Weber, Christian D. Hildebrand, Frank Pishnamaz, Miguel |
author_facet | Laubach, Markus Bläsius, Felix M. Volland, Ruth Knobe, Matthias Weber, Christian D. Hildebrand, Frank Pishnamaz, Miguel |
author_sort | Laubach, Markus |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 and HA Group 1278 patients). In-hospital care and a 120-day postoperative follow-up were conducted. Primary outcomes, including mobility, residential status, reoperation rate, and a generic health status measure (EQ-5D score), and the secondary outcome of mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess independent treatment group associations (odds ratios, ORs) with the primary and secondary end points. RESULTS: Patients in the HA group were older (83 vs. 81 years, p < 0.001) and scored higher on the Identification of Seniors at Risk screening (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). We observed no differences in residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D score, or mortality between groups. After adjusting for key covariates, including prefracture ambulatory capacity, the mobility of patients in the HA group was more frequently impaired at the 120-day follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–4.74). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HA compared to treatment with IF led to a more than twofold increase in the adjusted odds of impaired ambulation at the short-term follow-up, while no significant associations with residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D index score, or mortality were observed. Thus, IF for geriatric nondisplaced FNFs was associated with superior mobility 120 days after surgery. However, before definitive treatment recommendations can be made, prospective, randomized, long-term studies must be performed to confirm our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9192444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91924442022-06-15 Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry Laubach, Markus Bläsius, Felix M. Volland, Ruth Knobe, Matthias Weber, Christian D. Hildebrand, Frank Pishnamaz, Miguel Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 and HA Group 1278 patients). In-hospital care and a 120-day postoperative follow-up were conducted. Primary outcomes, including mobility, residential status, reoperation rate, and a generic health status measure (EQ-5D score), and the secondary outcome of mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess independent treatment group associations (odds ratios, ORs) with the primary and secondary end points. RESULTS: Patients in the HA group were older (83 vs. 81 years, p < 0.001) and scored higher on the Identification of Seniors at Risk screening (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). We observed no differences in residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D score, or mortality between groups. After adjusting for key covariates, including prefracture ambulatory capacity, the mobility of patients in the HA group was more frequently impaired at the 120-day follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–4.74). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HA compared to treatment with IF led to a more than twofold increase in the adjusted odds of impaired ambulation at the short-term follow-up, while no significant associations with residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D index score, or mortality were observed. Thus, IF for geriatric nondisplaced FNFs was associated with superior mobility 120 days after surgery. However, before definitive treatment recommendations can be made, prospective, randomized, long-term studies must be performed to confirm our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9192444/ /pubmed/34609521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Article Laubach, Markus Bläsius, Felix M. Volland, Ruth Knobe, Matthias Weber, Christian D. Hildebrand, Frank Pishnamaz, Miguel Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title | Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title_full | Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title_fullStr | Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title_full_unstemmed | Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title_short | Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
title_sort | internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT laubachmarkus internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT blasiusfelixm internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT vollandruth internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT knobematthias internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT weberchristiand internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT hildebrandfrank internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT pishnamazmiguel internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry AT internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry |