Cargando…

Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry

PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laubach, Markus, Bläsius, Felix M., Volland, Ruth, Knobe, Matthias, Weber, Christian D., Hildebrand, Frank, Pishnamaz, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1
_version_ 1784726242719694848
author Laubach, Markus
Bläsius, Felix M.
Volland, Ruth
Knobe, Matthias
Weber, Christian D.
Hildebrand, Frank
Pishnamaz, Miguel
author_facet Laubach, Markus
Bläsius, Felix M.
Volland, Ruth
Knobe, Matthias
Weber, Christian D.
Hildebrand, Frank
Pishnamaz, Miguel
author_sort Laubach, Markus
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 and HA Group 1278 patients). In-hospital care and a 120-day postoperative follow-up were conducted. Primary outcomes, including mobility, residential status, reoperation rate, and a generic health status measure (EQ-5D score), and the secondary outcome of mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess independent treatment group associations (odds ratios, ORs) with the primary and secondary end points. RESULTS: Patients in the HA group were older (83 vs. 81 years, p < 0.001) and scored higher on the Identification of Seniors at Risk screening (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). We observed no differences in residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D score, or mortality between groups. After adjusting for key covariates, including prefracture ambulatory capacity, the mobility of patients in the HA group was more frequently impaired at the 120-day follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–4.74). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HA compared to treatment with IF led to a more than twofold increase in the adjusted odds of impaired ambulation at the short-term follow-up, while no significant associations with residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D index score, or mortality were observed. Thus, IF for geriatric nondisplaced FNFs was associated with superior mobility 120 days after surgery. However, before definitive treatment recommendations can be made, prospective, randomized, long-term studies must be performed to confirm our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9192444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91924442022-06-15 Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry Laubach, Markus Bläsius, Felix M. Volland, Ruth Knobe, Matthias Weber, Christian D. Hildebrand, Frank Pishnamaz, Miguel Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Original Article PURPOSE: To determine whether internal fixation (IF) or hip arthroplasty (HA) is associated with superior outcomes in geriatric nondisplaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) patients. METHODS: Data from the Registry for Geriatric Trauma of the German Trauma Society (ATR-DGU) were analyzed (IF Group 449 and HA Group 1278 patients). In-hospital care and a 120-day postoperative follow-up were conducted. Primary outcomes, including mobility, residential status, reoperation rate, and a generic health status measure (EQ-5D score), and the secondary outcome of mortality were compared between groups. Multivariable analyses were performed to assess independent treatment group associations (odds ratios, ORs) with the primary and secondary end points. RESULTS: Patients in the HA group were older (83 vs. 81 years, p < 0.001) and scored higher on the Identification of Seniors at Risk screening (3 vs. 2, p < 0.001). We observed no differences in residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D score, or mortality between groups. After adjusting for key covariates, including prefracture ambulatory capacity, the mobility of patients in the HA group was more frequently impaired at the 120-day follow-up (OR 2.28, 95% confidence interval = 1.11–4.74). CONCLUSION: Treatment with HA compared to treatment with IF led to a more than twofold increase in the adjusted odds of impaired ambulation at the short-term follow-up, while no significant associations with residential status, reoperation rate, EQ-5D index score, or mortality were observed. Thus, IF for geriatric nondisplaced FNFs was associated with superior mobility 120 days after surgery. However, before definitive treatment recommendations can be made, prospective, randomized, long-term studies must be performed to confirm our findings. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-10-05 2022 /pmc/articles/PMC9192444/ /pubmed/34609521 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Article
Laubach, Markus
Bläsius, Felix M.
Volland, Ruth
Knobe, Matthias
Weber, Christian D.
Hildebrand, Frank
Pishnamaz, Miguel
Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title_full Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title_fullStr Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title_full_unstemmed Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title_short Internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
title_sort internal fixation versus hip arthroplasty in patients with nondisplaced femoral neck fractures: short-term results from a geriatric trauma registry
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34609521
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00068-021-01801-1
work_keys_str_mv AT laubachmarkus internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT blasiusfelixm internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT vollandruth internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT knobematthias internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT weberchristiand internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT hildebrandfrank internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT pishnamazmiguel internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry
AT internalfixationversushiparthroplastyinpatientswithnondisplacedfemoralneckfracturesshorttermresultsfromageriatrictraumaregistry