Cargando…

Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND: FDG-PET/CT has a high negative predictive value to detect residual nodal disease in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the positive predictive value remains suboptimal due to inflammation after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soffers, Frederik, Helsen, Nils, Van den Wyngaert, Tim, Carp, Laurens, Hoekstra, Otto S., Goethals, Laurence, Martens, Michel, Deben, Kristof, Spaepen, Karoline, De Bree, Remco, De Geeter, Frank, Zwezerijnen, G. J. C., Van Laer, Carl, Maes, Alex, Lenssen, Olivier, Stroobants, Sigrid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00905-y
_version_ 1784726328224776192
author Soffers, Frederik
Helsen, Nils
Van den Wyngaert, Tim
Carp, Laurens
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Goethals, Laurence
Martens, Michel
Deben, Kristof
Spaepen, Karoline
De Bree, Remco
De Geeter, Frank
Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.
Van Laer, Carl
Maes, Alex
Lenssen, Olivier
Stroobants, Sigrid
author_facet Soffers, Frederik
Helsen, Nils
Van den Wyngaert, Tim
Carp, Laurens
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Goethals, Laurence
Martens, Michel
Deben, Kristof
Spaepen, Karoline
De Bree, Remco
De Geeter, Frank
Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.
Van Laer, Carl
Maes, Alex
Lenssen, Olivier
Stroobants, Sigrid
author_sort Soffers, Frederik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: FDG-PET/CT has a high negative predictive value to detect residual nodal disease in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the positive predictive value remains suboptimal due to inflammation after radiotherapy, generating unnecessary further investigations and possibly even surgery. We report the results of a preplanned secondary end point of the ECLYPS study regarding the potential advantages of dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging (DTPI) in this setting. Standardized dedicated head and neck FDG-PET/CT images were obtained 12 weeks after CCRT at 60 and 120 min after tracer administration. We performed a semiquantitative assessment of lymph nodes, and the retention index (RI) was explored to optimize diagnostic performance. The reference standard was histology, negative FDG-PET/CT at 1 year, or > 2 years of clinical follow-up. The time-dependent area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curves was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 102 subjects were eligible for analysis. SUV values increased in malignant nodes (median SUV(1) = 2.6 vs. SUV(2) = 2.7; P = 0.04) but not in benign nodes (median SUV(1) = 1.8 vs. SUV(2) = 1.7; P = 0.28). In benign nodes, RI was negative although highly variable (median RI = − 2.6; IQR 21.2), while in malignant nodes RI was positive (median RI = 12.3; IQR 37.2) and significantly higher (P = 0.018) compared to benign nodes. A combined threshold (SUV(1) ≥ 2.2 + RI ≥ 3%) significantly reduced the amount of false-positive cases by 53% (P = 0.02) resulting in an increased specificity (90.8% vs. 80.5%) and PPV (52.9% vs. 37.0%), while sensitivity (60.0% vs. 66.7%) and NPV remained comparably high (92.9% vs. 93.3%). However, AUROC, as overall measure of benefit in diagnostic accuracy, did not significantly improve (P = 0.62). In HPV-related disease (n = 32), there was no significant difference between SUV(1), SUV(2), and RI in malignant and benign nodes, yet this subgroup was small. CONCLUSIONS: DTPI did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect residual disease 12 weeks after chemoradiation. Due to differences in tracer kinetics between malignant and benign nodes, DTPI improved the specificity, but at the expense of a loss in sensitivity, albeit minimal. Since false negatives at the 12 weeks PET/CT are mainly due to minimal residual disease, DTPI is not able to significantly improve sensitivity, but repeat scanning at a later time (e.g. after 12 months) could possibly solve this problem. Further study is required in HPV-associated disease.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9192834
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91928342022-06-15 Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy Soffers, Frederik Helsen, Nils Van den Wyngaert, Tim Carp, Laurens Hoekstra, Otto S. Goethals, Laurence Martens, Michel Deben, Kristof Spaepen, Karoline De Bree, Remco De Geeter, Frank Zwezerijnen, G. J. C. Van Laer, Carl Maes, Alex Lenssen, Olivier Stroobants, Sigrid EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: FDG-PET/CT has a high negative predictive value to detect residual nodal disease in patients with locally advanced squamous cell head and neck cancer after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the positive predictive value remains suboptimal due to inflammation after radiotherapy, generating unnecessary further investigations and possibly even surgery. We report the results of a preplanned secondary end point of the ECLYPS study regarding the potential advantages of dual time point FDG-PET/CT imaging (DTPI) in this setting. Standardized dedicated head and neck FDG-PET/CT images were obtained 12 weeks after CCRT at 60 and 120 min after tracer administration. We performed a semiquantitative assessment of lymph nodes, and the retention index (RI) was explored to optimize diagnostic performance. The reference standard was histology, negative FDG-PET/CT at 1 year, or > 2 years of clinical follow-up. The time-dependent area under the receiver operator characteristics (AUROC) curves was calculated. RESULTS: In total, 102 subjects were eligible for analysis. SUV values increased in malignant nodes (median SUV(1) = 2.6 vs. SUV(2) = 2.7; P = 0.04) but not in benign nodes (median SUV(1) = 1.8 vs. SUV(2) = 1.7; P = 0.28). In benign nodes, RI was negative although highly variable (median RI = − 2.6; IQR 21.2), while in malignant nodes RI was positive (median RI = 12.3; IQR 37.2) and significantly higher (P = 0.018) compared to benign nodes. A combined threshold (SUV(1) ≥ 2.2 + RI ≥ 3%) significantly reduced the amount of false-positive cases by 53% (P = 0.02) resulting in an increased specificity (90.8% vs. 80.5%) and PPV (52.9% vs. 37.0%), while sensitivity (60.0% vs. 66.7%) and NPV remained comparably high (92.9% vs. 93.3%). However, AUROC, as overall measure of benefit in diagnostic accuracy, did not significantly improve (P = 0.62). In HPV-related disease (n = 32), there was no significant difference between SUV(1), SUV(2), and RI in malignant and benign nodes, yet this subgroup was small. CONCLUSIONS: DTPI did not improve the overall diagnostic accuracy of FDG-PET/CT to detect residual disease 12 weeks after chemoradiation. Due to differences in tracer kinetics between malignant and benign nodes, DTPI improved the specificity, but at the expense of a loss in sensitivity, albeit minimal. Since false negatives at the 12 weeks PET/CT are mainly due to minimal residual disease, DTPI is not able to significantly improve sensitivity, but repeat scanning at a later time (e.g. after 12 months) could possibly solve this problem. Further study is required in HPV-associated disease. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2022-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC9192834/ /pubmed/35695940 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00905-y Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research
Soffers, Frederik
Helsen, Nils
Van den Wyngaert, Tim
Carp, Laurens
Hoekstra, Otto S.
Goethals, Laurence
Martens, Michel
Deben, Kristof
Spaepen, Karoline
De Bree, Remco
De Geeter, Frank
Zwezerijnen, G. J. C.
Van Laer, Carl
Maes, Alex
Lenssen, Olivier
Stroobants, Sigrid
Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title_full Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title_fullStr Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title_full_unstemmed Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title_short Dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
title_sort dual time point imaging in locally advanced head and neck cancer to assess residual nodal disease after chemoradiotherapy
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9192834/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35695940
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-022-00905-y
work_keys_str_mv AT soffersfrederik dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT helsennils dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT vandenwyngaerttim dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT carplaurens dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT hoekstraottos dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT goethalslaurence dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT martensmichel dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT debenkristof dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT spaepenkaroline dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT debreeremco dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT degeeterfrank dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT zwezerijnengjc dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT vanlaercarl dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT maesalex dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT lenssenolivier dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT stroobantssigrid dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy
AT dualtimepointimaginginlocallyadvancedheadandneckcancertoassessresidualnodaldiseaseafterchemoradiotherapy