Cargando…

Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping

OBJECTIVES: The WHO has recommended the accurate and practical microbiologic assay (MBA) to assess population folate status. To help laboratories in low-resource countries conduct folate measurements, the CDC developed a folate MBA kit containing critical reagents: calibrator, microorganism, quality...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Mindy, Fischer, Christina, Jabbar, Shameem, Pfeiffer, Christine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.075
_version_ 1784726433746124800
author Zhang, Mindy
Fischer, Christina
Jabbar, Shameem
Pfeiffer, Christine
author_facet Zhang, Mindy
Fischer, Christina
Jabbar, Shameem
Pfeiffer, Christine
author_sort Zhang, Mindy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The WHO has recommended the accurate and practical microbiologic assay (MBA) to assess population folate status. To help laboratories in low-resource countries conduct folate measurements, the CDC developed a folate MBA kit containing critical reagents: calibrator, microorganism, quality control (QC), and reagent stock solutions to prepare culture medium. Shipping frozen kits internationally is complex and sometimes delayed, potentially causing materials to thaw. We investigated whether refrigerated or ambient kit temperatures affect folate results. METHODS: We conditioned 5-methyltetrahydrofolate calibrator stock solution, L. rhamnosus microorganism inoculation, serum and whole blood lysate (WBL) QC samples, and reagent stock solutions (ascorbic acid, chloramphenicol, and manganese sulfate) at 6°C ≤ 3 d and 20°C ≤ 2 d protected from light; we then compared conditioned vs. optimally stored materials (-70°C) by analyzing serum and/or WBL samples (≥3 runs). RESULTS: The conditioned calibrator showed a mean folate difference (range from 3 runs for 43 WBL samples) of −0.3% (−4.0 to 4.1%) at 6°C/3 d and 0.9% (−1.6% to 2.7%) at 20°C/2 d. Similarly, the conditioned microorganism showed a mean difference of 4.3% (0.7% to 8.3%) at 6°C/3 d and 0.6% (−3.5% to 4.9%) at 20°C/2 d. The conditioned reagents showed a mean difference (range from 3 runs for 5 serum and 5 WBL samples) of 0.3% (−7.4% to 9.0%) at 6°C/3 d and 3.6% (0.1% to 9.0%) at 20°C/2 d. The 2 conditioned serum QC samples (∼13 and ∼40 nmol/L) showed a mean difference (range from 6 runs) of −0.6% (−6.0% to 2.3%) at 6°C/1 d, but higher differences of −5.8%, −5.9%, and −20.7% at 6°C/3 d, 20°C/1 d, and 20°C/2 d, respectively. The conditioned low WBL QC sample (∼300 nmol/L) showed small mean differences (−1.5%, −2.4%, −1.7%, and −0.3% at 6°C/1 d, 6°C/3 d, 20°C/1 d, and 20°C/2 d, respectively), while the conditioned high WBL QC sample (∼600 nmol/L) showed higher mean differences (−3.1%, −12.4%, −6.9%, and −23.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All kit components except for the QC materials demonstrated adequate stability (<5% change) at 6°C ≤ 3 d or at 20°C ≤ 2 d. The QC materials should not be exposed to 6°C for > 1 d to ensure stability. These findings provide important and practical information for kit shipment management. FUNDING SOURCES: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193331
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91933312022-06-14 Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping Zhang, Mindy Fischer, Christina Jabbar, Shameem Pfeiffer, Christine Curr Dev Nutr Global Nutrition OBJECTIVES: The WHO has recommended the accurate and practical microbiologic assay (MBA) to assess population folate status. To help laboratories in low-resource countries conduct folate measurements, the CDC developed a folate MBA kit containing critical reagents: calibrator, microorganism, quality control (QC), and reagent stock solutions to prepare culture medium. Shipping frozen kits internationally is complex and sometimes delayed, potentially causing materials to thaw. We investigated whether refrigerated or ambient kit temperatures affect folate results. METHODS: We conditioned 5-methyltetrahydrofolate calibrator stock solution, L. rhamnosus microorganism inoculation, serum and whole blood lysate (WBL) QC samples, and reagent stock solutions (ascorbic acid, chloramphenicol, and manganese sulfate) at 6°C ≤ 3 d and 20°C ≤ 2 d protected from light; we then compared conditioned vs. optimally stored materials (-70°C) by analyzing serum and/or WBL samples (≥3 runs). RESULTS: The conditioned calibrator showed a mean folate difference (range from 3 runs for 43 WBL samples) of −0.3% (−4.0 to 4.1%) at 6°C/3 d and 0.9% (−1.6% to 2.7%) at 20°C/2 d. Similarly, the conditioned microorganism showed a mean difference of 4.3% (0.7% to 8.3%) at 6°C/3 d and 0.6% (−3.5% to 4.9%) at 20°C/2 d. The conditioned reagents showed a mean difference (range from 3 runs for 5 serum and 5 WBL samples) of 0.3% (−7.4% to 9.0%) at 6°C/3 d and 3.6% (0.1% to 9.0%) at 20°C/2 d. The 2 conditioned serum QC samples (∼13 and ∼40 nmol/L) showed a mean difference (range from 6 runs) of −0.6% (−6.0% to 2.3%) at 6°C/1 d, but higher differences of −5.8%, −5.9%, and −20.7% at 6°C/3 d, 20°C/1 d, and 20°C/2 d, respectively. The conditioned low WBL QC sample (∼300 nmol/L) showed small mean differences (−1.5%, −2.4%, −1.7%, and −0.3% at 6°C/1 d, 6°C/3 d, 20°C/1 d, and 20°C/2 d, respectively), while the conditioned high WBL QC sample (∼600 nmol/L) showed higher mean differences (−3.1%, −12.4%, −6.9%, and −23.7%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: All kit components except for the QC materials demonstrated adequate stability (<5% change) at 6°C ≤ 3 d or at 20°C ≤ 2 d. The QC materials should not be exposed to 6°C for > 1 d to ensure stability. These findings provide important and practical information for kit shipment management. FUNDING SOURCES: None. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193331/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.075 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Global Nutrition
Zhang, Mindy
Fischer, Christina
Jabbar, Shameem
Pfeiffer, Christine
Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title_full Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title_fullStr Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title_full_unstemmed Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title_short Robustness of the CDC Folate Microbiologic Assay Kit During Simulated Delayed Shipping
title_sort robustness of the cdc folate microbiologic assay kit during simulated delayed shipping
topic Global Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193331/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.075
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangmindy robustnessofthecdcfolatemicrobiologicassaykitduringsimulateddelayedshipping
AT fischerchristina robustnessofthecdcfolatemicrobiologicassaykitduringsimulateddelayedshipping
AT jabbarshameem robustnessofthecdcfolatemicrobiologicassaykitduringsimulateddelayedshipping
AT pfeifferchristine robustnessofthecdcfolatemicrobiologicassaykitduringsimulateddelayedshipping