Cargando…

Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management

OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briggs, Telema, Hallman, William, Quick, Virginia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193447/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013
_version_ 1784726463884296192
author Briggs, Telema
Hallman, William
Quick, Virginia
author_facet Briggs, Telema
Hallman, William
Quick, Virginia
author_sort Briggs, Telema
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of an app among consumers. METHODS: A preliminary search for apps was conducted in Apple App Store and Google Play Store using keywords “diet” and “weight loss” in October 2020. Selection criteria screened to only include calorie-tracking apps with greater than 10 million installations, focused on weight management as a primary outcome. Apps addressing other health outcomes, disease management, or specific dietary approaches were excluded. Selected apps were assessed with iPads using a prescribed 7-day dietary intake and collected data were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant correlations between any of the individual recommendation categories and app metadata attributes (app ratings, installations, subscription cost). Greatest recommendation adherence was observed in those corresponding to nutrition intervention (n = 9 recommendations; 65.9%) and monitoring and evaluation categories (n = 2 recommendations; 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps offer limited adherence to expert guideline recommendations for adult weight management. FUNDING SOURCES: The authors of this article disclose no funding source in support of this work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193447
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91934472022-06-14 Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management Briggs, Telema Hallman, William Quick, Virginia Curr Dev Nutr Community and Public Health Nutrition OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of an app among consumers. METHODS: A preliminary search for apps was conducted in Apple App Store and Google Play Store using keywords “diet” and “weight loss” in October 2020. Selection criteria screened to only include calorie-tracking apps with greater than 10 million installations, focused on weight management as a primary outcome. Apps addressing other health outcomes, disease management, or specific dietary approaches were excluded. Selected apps were assessed with iPads using a prescribed 7-day dietary intake and collected data were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant correlations between any of the individual recommendation categories and app metadata attributes (app ratings, installations, subscription cost). Greatest recommendation adherence was observed in those corresponding to nutrition intervention (n = 9 recommendations; 65.9%) and monitoring and evaluation categories (n = 2 recommendations; 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps offer limited adherence to expert guideline recommendations for adult weight management. FUNDING SOURCES: The authors of this article disclose no funding source in support of this work. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193447/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Community and Public Health Nutrition
Briggs, Telema
Hallman, William
Quick, Virginia
Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title_full Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title_fullStr Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title_short Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
title_sort evaluating the adherence of popular diet and nutrition apps to evidence-based guidelines for adult weight management
topic Community and Public Health Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193447/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013
work_keys_str_mv AT briggstelema evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement
AT hallmanwilliam evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement
AT quickvirginia evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement