Cargando…
Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management
OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193447/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013 |
_version_ | 1784726463884296192 |
---|---|
author | Briggs, Telema Hallman, William Quick, Virginia |
author_facet | Briggs, Telema Hallman, William Quick, Virginia |
author_sort | Briggs, Telema |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of an app among consumers. METHODS: A preliminary search for apps was conducted in Apple App Store and Google Play Store using keywords “diet” and “weight loss” in October 2020. Selection criteria screened to only include calorie-tracking apps with greater than 10 million installations, focused on weight management as a primary outcome. Apps addressing other health outcomes, disease management, or specific dietary approaches were excluded. Selected apps were assessed with iPads using a prescribed 7-day dietary intake and collected data were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant correlations between any of the individual recommendation categories and app metadata attributes (app ratings, installations, subscription cost). Greatest recommendation adherence was observed in those corresponding to nutrition intervention (n = 9 recommendations; 65.9%) and monitoring and evaluation categories (n = 2 recommendations; 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps offer limited adherence to expert guideline recommendations for adult weight management. FUNDING SOURCES: The authors of this article disclose no funding source in support of this work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9193447 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91934472022-06-14 Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management Briggs, Telema Hallman, William Quick, Virginia Curr Dev Nutr Community and Public Health Nutrition OBJECTIVES: To assess the adherence of popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps to the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics’ Adult Weight Management (AWM) guideline recommendations and to discern associations between the guideline adherence and indicators of the perceived popularity of an app among consumers. METHODS: A preliminary search for apps was conducted in Apple App Store and Google Play Store using keywords “diet” and “weight loss” in October 2020. Selection criteria screened to only include calorie-tracking apps with greater than 10 million installations, focused on weight management as a primary outcome. Apps addressing other health outcomes, disease management, or specific dietary approaches were excluded. Selected apps were assessed with iPads using a prescribed 7-day dietary intake and collected data were recorded. RESULTS: There were no significant correlations between any of the individual recommendation categories and app metadata attributes (app ratings, installations, subscription cost). Greatest recommendation adherence was observed in those corresponding to nutrition intervention (n = 9 recommendations; 65.9%) and monitoring and evaluation categories (n = 2 recommendations; 75%). CONCLUSIONS: Popular, commercially available diet and nutrition apps offer limited adherence to expert guideline recommendations for adult weight management. FUNDING SOURCES: The authors of this article disclose no funding source in support of this work. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193447/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Community and Public Health Nutrition Briggs, Telema Hallman, William Quick, Virginia Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title | Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title_full | Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title_fullStr | Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title_short | Evaluating the Adherence of Popular Diet and Nutrition Apps to Evidence-Based Guidelines for Adult Weight Management |
title_sort | evaluating the adherence of popular diet and nutrition apps to evidence-based guidelines for adult weight management |
topic | Community and Public Health Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193447/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.013 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT briggstelema evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement AT hallmanwilliam evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement AT quickvirginia evaluatingtheadherenceofpopulardietandnutritionappstoevidencebasedguidelinesforadultweightmanagement |