Cargando…

Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?

OBJECTIVES: Using a single question to assess an individual's diet quality could reduce researcher burden when screening potential participants for dietary interventions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if United States (US) adults can accurately assess the quality of their die...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thomson, Jessica, Landry, Alicia, Walls, Tameka
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac067.072
_version_ 1784726474449747968
author Thomson, Jessica
Landry, Alicia
Walls, Tameka
author_facet Thomson, Jessica
Landry, Alicia
Walls, Tameka
author_sort Thomson, Jessica
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Using a single question to assess an individual's diet quality could reduce researcher burden when screening potential participants for dietary interventions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if United States (US) adults can accurately assess the quality of their diet. METHODS: Data from two cycles of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2015–2016 and 2017–2018, were used for this study. Self-assessed diet quality was measured with a single question asking adults, aged ≥20 years, how healthy is your diet? The five responses included excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. Measured diet quality was assessed using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) and based on 24-hour dietary recalls. HEI-2015 total scores were categorized using a 10-point grading scale as A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69) and F (0–59). The following matches between self-assessed and measured diet quality were classified as accurate assessments: excellent = A, very good = A or B, good = B or C, fair = C or D, and poor = D or F. All others were classified as inaccurate assessments. Descriptive statistical methods for complex survey designs were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Based on 9,757 adult participants, 8%, 22%, 41%, 24%, and 6% self-assessed their diet as excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor, respectively. For measured diet quality, < 1%, 3%, 9%, 19%, and 70% of participants scored grades of A, B, C, D, and F, respectively. Overall, 15% of participants accurately assessed their diet quality with accuracy percentages as high as 96% in the poor self-assessment group and between 1% and 22% in the other four self-assessment groups. Of the 8,002 participants who inaccurately assessed their diet quality, 75% overrated the healthfulness of their diet. CONCLUSIONS: In general, US adults cannot accurately assess the quality of their diet with the exception of those assessing the healthfulness of their diet as poor. The tendency of US adults to overrate their diet quality suggests that work is needed to educate adults about what constitutes a healthful diet with the knowledge gained potentially resulting in more healthful dietary intake. FUNDING SOURCES: USDA ARS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91934882022-06-14 Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality? Thomson, Jessica Landry, Alicia Walls, Tameka Curr Dev Nutr Nutritional Epidemiology OBJECTIVES: Using a single question to assess an individual's diet quality could reduce researcher burden when screening potential participants for dietary interventions. Thus, the purpose of this study was to determine if United States (US) adults can accurately assess the quality of their diet. METHODS: Data from two cycles of National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), 2015–2016 and 2017–2018, were used for this study. Self-assessed diet quality was measured with a single question asking adults, aged ≥20 years, how healthy is your diet? The five responses included excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor. Measured diet quality was assessed using the 2015 Healthy Eating Index (HEI-2015) and based on 24-hour dietary recalls. HEI-2015 total scores were categorized using a 10-point grading scale as A (90–100), B (80–89), C (70–79), D (60–69) and F (0–59). The following matches between self-assessed and measured diet quality were classified as accurate assessments: excellent = A, very good = A or B, good = B or C, fair = C or D, and poor = D or F. All others were classified as inaccurate assessments. Descriptive statistical methods for complex survey designs were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Based on 9,757 adult participants, 8%, 22%, 41%, 24%, and 6% self-assessed their diet as excellent, very good, good, fair, and poor, respectively. For measured diet quality, < 1%, 3%, 9%, 19%, and 70% of participants scored grades of A, B, C, D, and F, respectively. Overall, 15% of participants accurately assessed their diet quality with accuracy percentages as high as 96% in the poor self-assessment group and between 1% and 22% in the other four self-assessment groups. Of the 8,002 participants who inaccurately assessed their diet quality, 75% overrated the healthfulness of their diet. CONCLUSIONS: In general, US adults cannot accurately assess the quality of their diet with the exception of those assessing the healthfulness of their diet as poor. The tendency of US adults to overrate their diet quality suggests that work is needed to educate adults about what constitutes a healthful diet with the knowledge gained potentially resulting in more healthful dietary intake. FUNDING SOURCES: USDA ARS. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193488/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac067.072 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Nutritional Epidemiology
Thomson, Jessica
Landry, Alicia
Walls, Tameka
Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title_full Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title_fullStr Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title_full_unstemmed Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title_short Can United States Adults Accurately Assess Their Diet Quality?
title_sort can united states adults accurately assess their diet quality?
topic Nutritional Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac067.072
work_keys_str_mv AT thomsonjessica canunitedstatesadultsaccuratelyassesstheirdietquality
AT landryalicia canunitedstatesadultsaccuratelyassesstheirdietquality
AT wallstameka canunitedstatesadultsaccuratelyassesstheirdietquality