Cargando…

SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation

OBJECTIVES: To provide state policy recommendations to support Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food pricing incentive programs. METHODS: The researchers analyzed SNAP healthy food pricing incentive programs across the U.S., specifically double Up Food Bucks, deployed surveys...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Callahan, Katrina, Wyatt, Kevin, Owens, Katherine, Buckingham-Schutt, Lyndi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193531/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.017
_version_ 1784726485890760704
author Callahan, Katrina
Wyatt, Kevin
Owens, Katherine
Buckingham-Schutt, Lyndi
author_facet Callahan, Katrina
Wyatt, Kevin
Owens, Katherine
Buckingham-Schutt, Lyndi
author_sort Callahan, Katrina
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To provide state policy recommendations to support Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food pricing incentive programs. METHODS: The researchers analyzed SNAP healthy food pricing incentive programs across the U.S., specifically double Up Food Bucks, deployed surveys to gather information on success of incentive programs in states with active programs, compared SNAP incentive appropriations across states and over time, evaluated the available data on program outcomes and success and created specific policy recommendations, and identified ways to support incentive funding. RESULTS: Non-state funded programs impacted an average of 50.5% of counties in any given state compared to an average of 65% of counties in states with state-funded programs. Non-state funded programs generate on average $1.40 in local economic activity compared to $1.79 generated in state-funded programs. State-funded organizations host more farmers markets and CSAs within their state than non-state-funded organizations, and while some state-funded programs only have one grocery store retailer within their state, they present a higher average of grocery store retailers who take part in their program than non-state-funded programs. Contrary, non-state-funded programs partner with more mobile markets in each state than state-funded programs. 25% of non-state funded organizations reported that their programs definitely had a positive influence on diet-related chronic diseases compared to 66.7% of state-funded organizations response (emphasis added). CONCLUSIONS: State-funded programs have a greater economic impact and have more positive health outcomes than non-state funded programs. State-funded programs suggest that focusing on the political parties of legislators may result in the most successful outcomes of receiving state funding by communicating specific variables to individuals in each specific party. FUNDING SOURCES: Funding was provided through The Harkin Institute of Public Policy & Citizen Engagement at Drake University.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91935312022-06-14 SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation Callahan, Katrina Wyatt, Kevin Owens, Katherine Buckingham-Schutt, Lyndi Curr Dev Nutr Community and Public Health Nutrition OBJECTIVES: To provide state policy recommendations to support Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) healthy food pricing incentive programs. METHODS: The researchers analyzed SNAP healthy food pricing incentive programs across the U.S., specifically double Up Food Bucks, deployed surveys to gather information on success of incentive programs in states with active programs, compared SNAP incentive appropriations across states and over time, evaluated the available data on program outcomes and success and created specific policy recommendations, and identified ways to support incentive funding. RESULTS: Non-state funded programs impacted an average of 50.5% of counties in any given state compared to an average of 65% of counties in states with state-funded programs. Non-state funded programs generate on average $1.40 in local economic activity compared to $1.79 generated in state-funded programs. State-funded organizations host more farmers markets and CSAs within their state than non-state-funded organizations, and while some state-funded programs only have one grocery store retailer within their state, they present a higher average of grocery store retailers who take part in their program than non-state-funded programs. Contrary, non-state-funded programs partner with more mobile markets in each state than state-funded programs. 25% of non-state funded organizations reported that their programs definitely had a positive influence on diet-related chronic diseases compared to 66.7% of state-funded organizations response (emphasis added). CONCLUSIONS: State-funded programs have a greater economic impact and have more positive health outcomes than non-state funded programs. State-funded programs suggest that focusing on the political parties of legislators may result in the most successful outcomes of receiving state funding by communicating specific variables to individuals in each specific party. FUNDING SOURCES: Funding was provided through The Harkin Institute of Public Policy & Citizen Engagement at Drake University. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193531/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.017 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Community and Public Health Nutrition
Callahan, Katrina
Wyatt, Kevin
Owens, Katherine
Buckingham-Schutt, Lyndi
SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title_full SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title_fullStr SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title_full_unstemmed SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title_short SNAP Healthy Food Pricing Incentive Programs: State Comparison & Evaluation
title_sort snap healthy food pricing incentive programs: state comparison & evaluation
topic Community and Public Health Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193531/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.017
work_keys_str_mv AT callahankatrina snaphealthyfoodpricingincentiveprogramsstatecomparisonevaluation
AT wyattkevin snaphealthyfoodpricingincentiveprogramsstatecomparisonevaluation
AT owenskatherine snaphealthyfoodpricingincentiveprogramsstatecomparisonevaluation
AT buckinghamschuttlyndi snaphealthyfoodpricingincentiveprogramsstatecomparisonevaluation