Cargando…

Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey

OBJECTIVES: To examine regional differences in food insufficiency among households with children between Deep South states and the rest of the United States during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey is a massive, online, and rapid...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaparro, M Pia, Rose, Diego
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193608/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.019
_version_ 1784726505500180480
author Chaparro, M Pia
Rose, Diego
author_facet Chaparro, M Pia
Rose, Diego
author_sort Chaparro, M Pia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To examine regional differences in food insufficiency among households with children between Deep South states and the rest of the United States during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey is a massive, online, and rapid interagency effort to provide data on the social consequences of COVID-19. Here, data on food insufficiency among households with children, reported by household respondents (N = 232,016), were taken from phases 3.1 (4/15–7/5/2021) and 3.2 (7/21–10/11/2021). The main predictor was living in a Deep South state (Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina). Logistic regression models were run separately for each phase, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, household head educational attainment, number of children in the household, and household income-to-poverty ratio. Differences in these variables between the regions were also assessed. Survey weights included with Pulse were used in all analyses. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of food insufficiency among households with children was 12.2% in phase 3.1, with a higher prevalence in Deep South states (16.4%) compared to non-Deep South states (11.8%; p < .0001). Food insufficiency prevalence decreased in phase 3.2 to 10.3% for all households, but regional differences remained (Deep South = 13.9%, non-Deep South = 9.9%). Crude analysis showed that households with children in Deep South states had 46% and 63% higher odds of food insufficiency than non-Deep South states in phases 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. Factors associated with food insufficiency, including lower income and lower educational status, were more common in the Deep South, but after adjusting for these and other covariates, the odds of food insufficiency in Deep South states were still significantly greater (phase 3.1: OR = 1.19, 95%CI = 1.04–1.37; phase 3.2: OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.13–1.51). CONCLUSIONS: Regional inequities in food insufficiency among households with children were present in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with Deep South states suffering from higher rates. Factors associated with this problem were worse in the Deep South, but they did not fully explain differences between regions. Future studies should investigate the reasons for these inequities. FUNDING SOURCES: Health Research Services Administration, DHHS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91936082022-06-14 Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey Chaparro, M Pia Rose, Diego Curr Dev Nutr Community and Public Health Nutrition OBJECTIVES: To examine regional differences in food insufficiency among households with children between Deep South states and the rest of the United States during the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The U.S. Census Bureau's Household Pulse Survey is a massive, online, and rapid interagency effort to provide data on the social consequences of COVID-19. Here, data on food insufficiency among households with children, reported by household respondents (N = 232,016), were taken from phases 3.1 (4/15–7/5/2021) and 3.2 (7/21–10/11/2021). The main predictor was living in a Deep South state (Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina). Logistic regression models were run separately for each phase, adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, household head educational attainment, number of children in the household, and household income-to-poverty ratio. Differences in these variables between the regions were also assessed. Survey weights included with Pulse were used in all analyses. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of food insufficiency among households with children was 12.2% in phase 3.1, with a higher prevalence in Deep South states (16.4%) compared to non-Deep South states (11.8%; p < .0001). Food insufficiency prevalence decreased in phase 3.2 to 10.3% for all households, but regional differences remained (Deep South = 13.9%, non-Deep South = 9.9%). Crude analysis showed that households with children in Deep South states had 46% and 63% higher odds of food insufficiency than non-Deep South states in phases 3.1 and 3.2, respectively. Factors associated with food insufficiency, including lower income and lower educational status, were more common in the Deep South, but after adjusting for these and other covariates, the odds of food insufficiency in Deep South states were still significantly greater (phase 3.1: OR = 1.19, 95%CI = 1.04–1.37; phase 3.2: OR = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.13–1.51). CONCLUSIONS: Regional inequities in food insufficiency among households with children were present in the second year of the COVID-19 pandemic, with Deep South states suffering from higher rates. Factors associated with this problem were worse in the Deep South, but they did not fully explain differences between regions. Future studies should investigate the reasons for these inequities. FUNDING SOURCES: Health Research Services Administration, DHHS. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193608/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.019 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Community and Public Health Nutrition
Chaparro, M Pia
Rose, Diego
Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title_full Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title_fullStr Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title_full_unstemmed Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title_short Regional Hotspots of Food Insufficiency During COVID-19: Evidence From the Household Pulse Survey
title_sort regional hotspots of food insufficiency during covid-19: evidence from the household pulse survey
topic Community and Public Health Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193608/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.019
work_keys_str_mv AT chaparrompia regionalhotspotsoffoodinsufficiencyduringcovid19evidencefromthehouseholdpulsesurvey
AT rosediego regionalhotspotsoffoodinsufficiencyduringcovid19evidencefromthehouseholdpulsesurvey