Cargando…
A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) explor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193621/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050 |
_version_ | 1784726508937412608 |
---|---|
author | Ngoutane, Raphia Murray-Kolb, Laura Zoma, Ramakwende Ouedraogo, Cesaire van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle Bruning, Rachel Razakandrainy, Andry Ransom, Elizabeth Kraemer, Klaus Kodish, Stephen |
author_facet | Ngoutane, Raphia Murray-Kolb, Laura Zoma, Ramakwende Ouedraogo, Cesaire van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle Bruning, Rachel Razakandrainy, Andry Ransom, Elizabeth Kraemer, Klaus Kodish, Stephen |
author_sort | Ngoutane, Raphia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) exploring the extent to which pregnant women have nutrition decision-making autonomy. METHODS: This multi-phased, formative study was conducted between Oct. 2020 - Feb. 2021 in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Data collection methods and sampling. Semi structured interviews (n = 46), focus group interviews (n = 12), and free lists (n = 90) were conducted among pregnant and lactating women. Analysis. Textual data from focus groups and semi-structured interviews were recorded and translated verbatim from local languages into French. The Food Choice Process Model guided textual content analysis using Dedoose software. Free list data were analyzed using cultural domain analysis approaches. RESULTS: Pregnant women receive nutrients through diets consisting primarily of staple foods, including rice and tô (millet or maize-based dough) in Madagascar and Burkina Faso, respectively. While locally-available vegetables and fruits are sometimes consumed when available, animal-source foods are rarely eaten among these samples. Differentially between contexts, maternal nutrition is influenced by a synergy of upstream factors that impact individual food choices, including available resources, social influences, and personal characteristics and ideals. While shared decision-making within key domains of autonomy (e.g., household finances) is normative between men and women in Madagascar, men were the primary decision makers across all areas of inquiry among the sample of participants from Burkina Faso. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal maternal diets are determined by inter-related, multi-level factors in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Further exploration on decision-making autonomy and its role in women's ability to consume optimal diets during pregnancy in these settings should be considered. FUNDING SOURCES: Sight and Life Foundation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9193621 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91936212022-06-14 A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model Ngoutane, Raphia Murray-Kolb, Laura Zoma, Ramakwende Ouedraogo, Cesaire van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle Bruning, Rachel Razakandrainy, Andry Ransom, Elizabeth Kraemer, Klaus Kodish, Stephen Curr Dev Nutr Global Nutrition OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) exploring the extent to which pregnant women have nutrition decision-making autonomy. METHODS: This multi-phased, formative study was conducted between Oct. 2020 - Feb. 2021 in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Data collection methods and sampling. Semi structured interviews (n = 46), focus group interviews (n = 12), and free lists (n = 90) were conducted among pregnant and lactating women. Analysis. Textual data from focus groups and semi-structured interviews were recorded and translated verbatim from local languages into French. The Food Choice Process Model guided textual content analysis using Dedoose software. Free list data were analyzed using cultural domain analysis approaches. RESULTS: Pregnant women receive nutrients through diets consisting primarily of staple foods, including rice and tô (millet or maize-based dough) in Madagascar and Burkina Faso, respectively. While locally-available vegetables and fruits are sometimes consumed when available, animal-source foods are rarely eaten among these samples. Differentially between contexts, maternal nutrition is influenced by a synergy of upstream factors that impact individual food choices, including available resources, social influences, and personal characteristics and ideals. While shared decision-making within key domains of autonomy (e.g., household finances) is normative between men and women in Madagascar, men were the primary decision makers across all areas of inquiry among the sample of participants from Burkina Faso. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal maternal diets are determined by inter-related, multi-level factors in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Further exploration on decision-making autonomy and its role in women's ability to consume optimal diets during pregnancy in these settings should be considered. FUNDING SOURCES: Sight and Life Foundation. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193621/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Global Nutrition Ngoutane, Raphia Murray-Kolb, Laura Zoma, Ramakwende Ouedraogo, Cesaire van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle Bruning, Rachel Razakandrainy, Andry Ransom, Elizabeth Kraemer, Klaus Kodish, Stephen A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title | A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title_full | A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title_short | A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model |
title_sort | comparative analysis of maternal nutrition decision-making autonomy during pregnancy in burkina faso and madagascar – an application of the food choice process model |
topic | Global Nutrition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193621/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ngoutaneraphia acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT murraykolblaura acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT zomaramakwende acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT ouedraogocesaire acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT vanzutphenkessogabrielle acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT bruningrachel acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT razakandrainyandry acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT ransomelizabeth acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT kraemerklaus acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT kodishstephen acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT ngoutaneraphia comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT murraykolblaura comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT zomaramakwende comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT ouedraogocesaire comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT vanzutphenkessogabrielle comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT bruningrachel comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT razakandrainyandry comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT ransomelizabeth comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT kraemerklaus comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel AT kodishstephen comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel |