Cargando…

A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ngoutane, Raphia, Murray-Kolb, Laura, Zoma, Ramakwende, Ouedraogo, Cesaire, van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle, Bruning, Rachel, Razakandrainy, Andry, Ransom, Elizabeth, Kraemer, Klaus, Kodish, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193621/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050
_version_ 1784726508937412608
author Ngoutane, Raphia
Murray-Kolb, Laura
Zoma, Ramakwende
Ouedraogo, Cesaire
van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle
Bruning, Rachel
Razakandrainy, Andry
Ransom, Elizabeth
Kraemer, Klaus
Kodish, Stephen
author_facet Ngoutane, Raphia
Murray-Kolb, Laura
Zoma, Ramakwende
Ouedraogo, Cesaire
van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle
Bruning, Rachel
Razakandrainy, Andry
Ransom, Elizabeth
Kraemer, Klaus
Kodish, Stephen
author_sort Ngoutane, Raphia
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) exploring the extent to which pregnant women have nutrition decision-making autonomy. METHODS: This multi-phased, formative study was conducted between Oct. 2020 - Feb. 2021 in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Data collection methods and sampling. Semi structured interviews (n = 46), focus group interviews (n = 12), and free lists (n = 90) were conducted among pregnant and lactating women. Analysis. Textual data from focus groups and semi-structured interviews were recorded and translated verbatim from local languages into French. The Food Choice Process Model guided textual content analysis using Dedoose software. Free list data were analyzed using cultural domain analysis approaches. RESULTS: Pregnant women receive nutrients through diets consisting primarily of staple foods, including rice and tô (millet or maize-based dough) in Madagascar and Burkina Faso, respectively. While locally-available vegetables and fruits are sometimes consumed when available, animal-source foods are rarely eaten among these samples. Differentially between contexts, maternal nutrition is influenced by a synergy of upstream factors that impact individual food choices, including available resources, social influences, and personal characteristics and ideals. While shared decision-making within key domains of autonomy (e.g., household finances) is normative between men and women in Madagascar, men were the primary decision makers across all areas of inquiry among the sample of participants from Burkina Faso. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal maternal diets are determined by inter-related, multi-level factors in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Further exploration on decision-making autonomy and its role in women's ability to consume optimal diets during pregnancy in these settings should be considered. FUNDING SOURCES: Sight and Life Foundation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91936212022-06-14 A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model Ngoutane, Raphia Murray-Kolb, Laura Zoma, Ramakwende Ouedraogo, Cesaire van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle Bruning, Rachel Razakandrainy, Andry Ransom, Elizabeth Kraemer, Klaus Kodish, Stephen Curr Dev Nutr Global Nutrition OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to conceptualize maternal nutrition decisions in rural Burkina Faso and Madagascar using the Food Choice Process Model by 1) describing typical maternal diets during pregnancy, 2) understanding multi-level factors that influence women's dietary choices, and 3) exploring the extent to which pregnant women have nutrition decision-making autonomy. METHODS: This multi-phased, formative study was conducted between Oct. 2020 - Feb. 2021 in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Data collection methods and sampling. Semi structured interviews (n = 46), focus group interviews (n = 12), and free lists (n = 90) were conducted among pregnant and lactating women. Analysis. Textual data from focus groups and semi-structured interviews were recorded and translated verbatim from local languages into French. The Food Choice Process Model guided textual content analysis using Dedoose software. Free list data were analyzed using cultural domain analysis approaches. RESULTS: Pregnant women receive nutrients through diets consisting primarily of staple foods, including rice and tô (millet or maize-based dough) in Madagascar and Burkina Faso, respectively. While locally-available vegetables and fruits are sometimes consumed when available, animal-source foods are rarely eaten among these samples. Differentially between contexts, maternal nutrition is influenced by a synergy of upstream factors that impact individual food choices, including available resources, social influences, and personal characteristics and ideals. While shared decision-making within key domains of autonomy (e.g., household finances) is normative between men and women in Madagascar, men were the primary decision makers across all areas of inquiry among the sample of participants from Burkina Faso. CONCLUSIONS: Sub-optimal maternal diets are determined by inter-related, multi-level factors in Burkina Faso and Madagascar. Further exploration on decision-making autonomy and its role in women's ability to consume optimal diets during pregnancy in these settings should be considered. FUNDING SOURCES: Sight and Life Foundation. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193621/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Global Nutrition
Ngoutane, Raphia
Murray-Kolb, Laura
Zoma, Ramakwende
Ouedraogo, Cesaire
van Zutphen, Kesso Gabrielle
Bruning, Rachel
Razakandrainy, Andry
Ransom, Elizabeth
Kraemer, Klaus
Kodish, Stephen
A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title_full A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title_fullStr A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title_short A Comparative Analysis of Maternal Nutrition Decision-Making Autonomy During Pregnancy in Burkina Faso and Madagascar – An Application of the Food Choice Process Model
title_sort comparative analysis of maternal nutrition decision-making autonomy during pregnancy in burkina faso and madagascar – an application of the food choice process model
topic Global Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193621/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac060.050
work_keys_str_mv AT ngoutaneraphia acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT murraykolblaura acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT zomaramakwende acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT ouedraogocesaire acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT vanzutphenkessogabrielle acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT bruningrachel acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT razakandrainyandry acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT ransomelizabeth acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT kraemerklaus acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT kodishstephen acomparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT ngoutaneraphia comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT murraykolblaura comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT zomaramakwende comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT ouedraogocesaire comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT vanzutphenkessogabrielle comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT bruningrachel comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT razakandrainyandry comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT ransomelizabeth comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT kraemerklaus comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel
AT kodishstephen comparativeanalysisofmaternalnutritiondecisionmakingautonomyduringpregnancyinburkinafasoandmadagascaranapplicationofthefoodchoiceprocessmodel