Cargando…

Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018

OBJECTIVES: To describe protein intake and percentage of adults who met protein recommendations by level of animal: plant protein intake. METHODS: Usual protein intake was estimated using two days of dietary intake data from adults 19+ years (N = 9707) in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES 2015–...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Hoy, Katherine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193762/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.031
_version_ 1784726545794859008
author Hoy, Katherine
author_facet Hoy, Katherine
author_sort Hoy, Katherine
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To describe protein intake and percentage of adults who met protein recommendations by level of animal: plant protein intake. METHODS: Usual protein intake was estimated using two days of dietary intake data from adults 19+ years (N = 9707) in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES 2015–2018. Those who did not have height and weight data were excluded, as well as pregnant and lactating women. Proportions of protein from animal and plant sources were estimated for each food in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies 2015–2018, then applied to the dietary intakes to determine the population intake of protein from animal and plant sources. Adults were classified by quintile (Q) of animal: plant protein intake by age and sex to determine the percentages who met or exceeded their Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) for protein (grams/kilogram body weight). Mean protein intakes and percentages who met their DRIs for each quintile were compared using t-tests. Results were considered significant at P < 0.001. RESULTS: The percentages of total protein from animal sources for each quintile were Q1: < 42.6; Q2: 42.6 - < 59.5; Q3: 59.5 - < 68.6; Q4: 68.9 - < 78.1; Q5: ≥78.1. Mean (SE) protein intakes (grams) were Q1: 61 (1.7); Q2: 75 (1.5); Q3: 86 (1.3); Q4: 99 (1.7); Q5: 110 (2.2); mean intakes of all quintiles differed significantly from each other(P < 0.001). Percentages meeting or above their DRIs for protein intake were Q1: 83 (4.2); Q2: 95 (1.1); Q3: 99 (0.6); Q4: 100 (0.4); and Q5: 99 (0.3). Percentage meeting DRIs for protein in Q1 was significantly lower than Q3, Q4, and Q5. The percentage meeting DRIs in Q5 was significantly higher than Q1 and Q2 (P < 0.001); Q3, Q4 and Q5 did not differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of animal protein intake were associated with a greater likelihood of adults meeting recommendations for protein intake. Evaluating food choices of those who met protein recommendations with lower animal protein intake may inform nutrition education about how protein recommendations for protein intake can be met when including more plant sources in the diet. FUNDING SOURCES: ARS-USDA.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193762
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91937622022-06-14 Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018 Hoy, Katherine Curr Dev Nutr Community and Public Health Nutrition OBJECTIVES: To describe protein intake and percentage of adults who met protein recommendations by level of animal: plant protein intake. METHODS: Usual protein intake was estimated using two days of dietary intake data from adults 19+ years (N = 9707) in What We Eat in America (WWEIA), NHANES 2015–2018. Those who did not have height and weight data were excluded, as well as pregnant and lactating women. Proportions of protein from animal and plant sources were estimated for each food in the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies 2015–2018, then applied to the dietary intakes to determine the population intake of protein from animal and plant sources. Adults were classified by quintile (Q) of animal: plant protein intake by age and sex to determine the percentages who met or exceeded their Dietary Reference Intake (DRI) for protein (grams/kilogram body weight). Mean protein intakes and percentages who met their DRIs for each quintile were compared using t-tests. Results were considered significant at P < 0.001. RESULTS: The percentages of total protein from animal sources for each quintile were Q1: < 42.6; Q2: 42.6 - < 59.5; Q3: 59.5 - < 68.6; Q4: 68.9 - < 78.1; Q5: ≥78.1. Mean (SE) protein intakes (grams) were Q1: 61 (1.7); Q2: 75 (1.5); Q3: 86 (1.3); Q4: 99 (1.7); Q5: 110 (2.2); mean intakes of all quintiles differed significantly from each other(P < 0.001). Percentages meeting or above their DRIs for protein intake were Q1: 83 (4.2); Q2: 95 (1.1); Q3: 99 (0.6); Q4: 100 (0.4); and Q5: 99 (0.3). Percentage meeting DRIs for protein in Q1 was significantly lower than Q3, Q4, and Q5. The percentage meeting DRIs in Q5 was significantly higher than Q1 and Q2 (P < 0.001); Q3, Q4 and Q5 did not differ from each other. CONCLUSIONS: Higher levels of animal protein intake were associated with a greater likelihood of adults meeting recommendations for protein intake. Evaluating food choices of those who met protein recommendations with lower animal protein intake may inform nutrition education about how protein recommendations for protein intake can be met when including more plant sources in the diet. FUNDING SOURCES: ARS-USDA. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193762/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.031 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Community and Public Health Nutrition
Hoy, Katherine
Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title_full Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title_fullStr Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title_full_unstemmed Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title_short Relationship Between Animal Protein Intake and Meeting Recommendations for Protein Intake Among U.S. Adults, What We Eat in America, NHANES 2015–2018
title_sort relationship between animal protein intake and meeting recommendations for protein intake among u.s. adults, what we eat in america, nhanes 2015–2018
topic Community and Public Health Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193762/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac051.031
work_keys_str_mv AT hoykatherine relationshipbetweenanimalproteinintakeandmeetingrecommendationsforproteinintakeamongusadultswhatweeatinamericanhanes20152018