Cargando…

How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages

OBJECTIVES: To assess how American adults consider and define healthfulness of food and beverages. METHODS: In Fall 2021, a national sample of 1,878 adults balanced by age (18–34 years, 35–49, 50–64, 65+), sex, race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latinx, Non-Hispanic Black, Asian/other), an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gerber, Suzannah, Reedy, Julia, O'Hearn, Meghan, Cruz, Sylara Marie, Mozaffarian, Dariush
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193890/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac059.012
_version_ 1784726579661766656
author Gerber, Suzannah
Reedy, Julia
O'Hearn, Meghan
Cruz, Sylara Marie
Mozaffarian, Dariush
author_facet Gerber, Suzannah
Reedy, Julia
O'Hearn, Meghan
Cruz, Sylara Marie
Mozaffarian, Dariush
author_sort Gerber, Suzannah
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To assess how American adults consider and define healthfulness of food and beverages. METHODS: In Fall 2021, a national sample of 1,878 adults balanced by age (18–34 years, 35–49, 50–64, 65+), sex, race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latinx, Non-Hispanic Black, Asian/other), and annual income, completed an online survey asking about demographics and priorities for food businesses and product purchases, including select-all and agreement rated items on definitions of healthfulness for food and beverages. Pearson's r and Jaccard Index were used to assess correlation (PCC) and choice similarity, respectively. RESULTS: Among 12 definitions of healthfulness, respondents most commonly chose nutritionally balanced (67%); all natural (56%); supports health outcomes (55%); and full of vitamins and minerals (52%); followed by organic (41%); safe to eat (41%); specific nutrient profile (38%); locally grown/culturally relevant (27%); supports weight loss (25%); non-GMO (23%); aids athletic/physical performance (16%); popular diet (13%). These perceptions varied by race/ethnicity and age. Nutritionally balanced was selected by 78% of Asian/other adults and 82% of 65 + y adults, vs. White (69%), Black (64%), or Hispanic/Latinx (61%) adults; or 50–65 y (75%), 35–49 y (59%), 18–34 y (57%). Findings were more similar by income. PCC was highest for nutritionally balanced and: full of vitamins (0.81); supports health outcomes (0.80); and all natural (0.76). Jaccard similarity was < 0.55 for all definition pairs except organic and safe to eat (0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, diverse national sample of US adults, consumers most defined healthfulness of food and beverages as nutritionally balanced, all natural, or supports health outcomes. Organic, supports weight loss, and non-GMO were much less reported as definitions of product healthfulness. No single definition was selected by >2/3of US adults; and combined with low Jaccard values, suggests a lack of consensus on simple definitions of healthfulness. Concepts were prioritized differently by age and race/ethnicity, but much less by income. These novel findings have implications for health communications, education, and guidance aimed at reducing consumer confusion about healthier food and beverage choices. FUNDING SOURCES: Vail Innovative Global Research; NIFA National Needs Fellowship.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91938902022-06-14 How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages Gerber, Suzannah Reedy, Julia O'Hearn, Meghan Cruz, Sylara Marie Mozaffarian, Dariush Curr Dev Nutr Food Choice, Markets and Policy OBJECTIVES: To assess how American adults consider and define healthfulness of food and beverages. METHODS: In Fall 2021, a national sample of 1,878 adults balanced by age (18–34 years, 35–49, 50–64, 65+), sex, race/ethnicity (Non-Hispanic White, Hispanic/Latinx, Non-Hispanic Black, Asian/other), and annual income, completed an online survey asking about demographics and priorities for food businesses and product purchases, including select-all and agreement rated items on definitions of healthfulness for food and beverages. Pearson's r and Jaccard Index were used to assess correlation (PCC) and choice similarity, respectively. RESULTS: Among 12 definitions of healthfulness, respondents most commonly chose nutritionally balanced (67%); all natural (56%); supports health outcomes (55%); and full of vitamins and minerals (52%); followed by organic (41%); safe to eat (41%); specific nutrient profile (38%); locally grown/culturally relevant (27%); supports weight loss (25%); non-GMO (23%); aids athletic/physical performance (16%); popular diet (13%). These perceptions varied by race/ethnicity and age. Nutritionally balanced was selected by 78% of Asian/other adults and 82% of 65 + y adults, vs. White (69%), Black (64%), or Hispanic/Latinx (61%) adults; or 50–65 y (75%), 35–49 y (59%), 18–34 y (57%). Findings were more similar by income. PCC was highest for nutritionally balanced and: full of vitamins (0.81); supports health outcomes (0.80); and all natural (0.76). Jaccard similarity was < 0.55 for all definition pairs except organic and safe to eat (0.99). CONCLUSIONS: In a large, diverse national sample of US adults, consumers most defined healthfulness of food and beverages as nutritionally balanced, all natural, or supports health outcomes. Organic, supports weight loss, and non-GMO were much less reported as definitions of product healthfulness. No single definition was selected by >2/3of US adults; and combined with low Jaccard values, suggests a lack of consensus on simple definitions of healthfulness. Concepts were prioritized differently by age and race/ethnicity, but much less by income. These novel findings have implications for health communications, education, and guidance aimed at reducing consumer confusion about healthier food and beverage choices. FUNDING SOURCES: Vail Innovative Global Research; NIFA National Needs Fellowship. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9193890/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac059.012 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Food Choice, Markets and Policy
Gerber, Suzannah
Reedy, Julia
O'Hearn, Meghan
Cruz, Sylara Marie
Mozaffarian, Dariush
How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title_full How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title_fullStr How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title_full_unstemmed How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title_short How Americans Define Health for Food and Beverages
title_sort how americans define health for food and beverages
topic Food Choice, Markets and Policy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193890/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac059.012
work_keys_str_mv AT gerbersuzannah howamericansdefinehealthforfoodandbeverages
AT reedyjulia howamericansdefinehealthforfoodandbeverages
AT ohearnmeghan howamericansdefinehealthforfoodandbeverages
AT cruzsylaramarie howamericansdefinehealthforfoodandbeverages
AT mozaffariandariush howamericansdefinehealthforfoodandbeverages