Cargando…
Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21)
BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement is important for monitoring patients’ progress. The study aimed to develop an outcome inventory (OI) for clinical use in routine practice in psychiatric services and to examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed OI. METHODS: 48 items measuring anxiety,...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09682 |
_version_ | 1784726584792449024 |
---|---|
author | Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kövi, Zsuzsanna |
author_facet | Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kövi, Zsuzsanna |
author_sort | Wongpakaran, Nahathai |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement is important for monitoring patients’ progress. The study aimed to develop an outcome inventory (OI) for clinical use in routine practice in psychiatric services and to examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed OI. METHODS: 48 items measuring anxiety, depression, interpersonal difficulties, and somatization were collected. Factor analysis was used to reduce the number of items. The final OI consisting of 21 items was then examined for psychometric properties among 1302 participants, 880 were nonclinical and 422 clinical patients. Tests included confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and diagnostic ability for major depression. Responsiveness was compared between baseline and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the OI-21 demonstrated the designated four components. Cronbach's alpha was good to excellent for all subjects with good test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, convergent and discriminant validity. It demonstrated area under the ROC curve of 0.89 indicating good diagnostic performance. Sensitivity to change after 3 months was observed in both types of treatment. However, interpersonal difficulties were sensitive to change in those receiving additional psychotherapy. CONCLUSION: OI-21 demonstrated its validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. It constitutes a promising tool for outcome assessment in nonclinical populations and among psychiatric patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9193908 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91939082022-06-15 Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kövi, Zsuzsanna Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: Outcome measurement is important for monitoring patients’ progress. The study aimed to develop an outcome inventory (OI) for clinical use in routine practice in psychiatric services and to examine the psychometric properties of the newly developed OI. METHODS: 48 items measuring anxiety, depression, interpersonal difficulties, and somatization were collected. Factor analysis was used to reduce the number of items. The final OI consisting of 21 items was then examined for psychometric properties among 1302 participants, 880 were nonclinical and 422 clinical patients. Tests included confirmatory factor analysis, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, convergent and discriminant validity, and diagnostic ability for major depression. Responsiveness was compared between baseline and 3-month follow-up. RESULTS: Confirmatory factor analysis revealed the OI-21 demonstrated the designated four components. Cronbach's alpha was good to excellent for all subjects with good test-retest reliability, concurrent validity, convergent and discriminant validity. It demonstrated area under the ROC curve of 0.89 indicating good diagnostic performance. Sensitivity to change after 3 months was observed in both types of treatment. However, interpersonal difficulties were sensitive to change in those receiving additional psychotherapy. CONCLUSION: OI-21 demonstrated its validity, reliability, and sensitivity to change. It constitutes a promising tool for outcome assessment in nonclinical populations and among psychiatric patients. Elsevier 2022-06-07 /pmc/articles/PMC9193908/ /pubmed/35711988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09682 Text en © 2022 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wongpakaran, Nahathai Wongpakaran, Tinakon Kövi, Zsuzsanna Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title | Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title_full | Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title_short | Development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (OI-21) |
title_sort | development and validation of 21-item outcome inventory (oi-21) |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193908/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711988 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09682 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wongpakarannahathai developmentandvalidationof21itemoutcomeinventoryoi21 AT wongpakarantinakon developmentandvalidationof21itemoutcomeinventoryoi21 AT kovizsuzsanna developmentandvalidationof21itemoutcomeinventoryoi21 |