Cargando…

Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care

BACKGROUND: The value that patient reported outcomes (PROs) can bring to the clinical encounter is increasingly being recognized. Within the field of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a number of activities have been initiated internationally with the aim of integrating PROs in MS care. Integration of PROs i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reitzel, Signe Baattrup, Lynning, Marie, Skovgaard, Lasse
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09637
_version_ 1784726585339805696
author Reitzel, Signe Baattrup
Lynning, Marie
Skovgaard, Lasse
author_facet Reitzel, Signe Baattrup
Lynning, Marie
Skovgaard, Lasse
author_sort Reitzel, Signe Baattrup
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The value that patient reported outcomes (PROs) can bring to the clinical encounter is increasingly being recognized. Within the field of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a number of activities have been initiated internationally with the aim of integrating PROs in MS care. Integration of PROs in MS care will, among other things, require MS neurologists' acceptance of PROs. This qualitative study aimed to explore MS specialized neurologists’ view on the potentials and barriers for the use of PROs in the clinical setting. METHODS: Eight neurologists specialized in MS participated in a series of individual in-depth semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis was conducted using a reflexive thematic approach to identify meaning units and themes emerging from the interviews. The analysis focused on barriers and potentials for PROs that relate to the specific characteristics of MS. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data. “The role of PROs in describing the patient's situation” describes how informants perceived MS as a complex disease, and in this context, PROs can bring forth new or otherwise hidden information, but they may also blur the picture. The theme “The validity of PROs reported by MS patients may be questionable” describes how impairments caused by MS, such as cognitive and physical disabilities, were identified as risk factors that could cause unreliable self-reported outcome measures within this patient group. Finally, the theme “Involving the patient” regards how the clinical conversation was viewed as the most important source of patient reported information, but at the same time PROs carry the potential to enhance shared decision making. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that, according to MS neurologists, integration of PROs in MS clinical practice, though possibly valuable, is not without challenges. Possible benefits of PROs include the ability to bring forth otherwise hidden information on the patient's health status and the enhancement of shared decision making. Barriers include difficulties in capturing the full situation of the patient via PROs due to the complexity of MS as well as the issue of various MS-related impairments compromising the validity of PROs reported by MS patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9193910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91939102022-06-15 Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care Reitzel, Signe Baattrup Lynning, Marie Skovgaard, Lasse Heliyon Research Article BACKGROUND: The value that patient reported outcomes (PROs) can bring to the clinical encounter is increasingly being recognized. Within the field of Multiple Sclerosis (MS), a number of activities have been initiated internationally with the aim of integrating PROs in MS care. Integration of PROs in MS care will, among other things, require MS neurologists' acceptance of PROs. This qualitative study aimed to explore MS specialized neurologists’ view on the potentials and barriers for the use of PROs in the clinical setting. METHODS: Eight neurologists specialized in MS participated in a series of individual in-depth semi-structured interviews. Interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed. A thematic analysis was conducted using a reflexive thematic approach to identify meaning units and themes emerging from the interviews. The analysis focused on barriers and potentials for PROs that relate to the specific characteristics of MS. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged from the data. “The role of PROs in describing the patient's situation” describes how informants perceived MS as a complex disease, and in this context, PROs can bring forth new or otherwise hidden information, but they may also blur the picture. The theme “The validity of PROs reported by MS patients may be questionable” describes how impairments caused by MS, such as cognitive and physical disabilities, were identified as risk factors that could cause unreliable self-reported outcome measures within this patient group. Finally, the theme “Involving the patient” regards how the clinical conversation was viewed as the most important source of patient reported information, but at the same time PROs carry the potential to enhance shared decision making. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that, according to MS neurologists, integration of PROs in MS clinical practice, though possibly valuable, is not without challenges. Possible benefits of PROs include the ability to bring forth otherwise hidden information on the patient's health status and the enhancement of shared decision making. Barriers include difficulties in capturing the full situation of the patient via PROs due to the complexity of MS as well as the issue of various MS-related impairments compromising the validity of PROs reported by MS patients. Elsevier 2022-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC9193910/ /pubmed/35711978 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09637 Text en © 2022 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Reitzel, Signe Baattrup
Lynning, Marie
Skovgaard, Lasse
Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title_full Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title_fullStr Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title_full_unstemmed Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title_short Neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
title_sort neurologists’ views on patient reported outcomes in multiple sclerosis care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9193910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35711978
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09637
work_keys_str_mv AT reitzelsignebaattrup neurologistsviewsonpatientreportedoutcomesinmultiplesclerosiscare
AT lynningmarie neurologistsviewsonpatientreportedoutcomesinmultiplesclerosiscare
AT skovgaardlasse neurologistsviewsonpatientreportedoutcomesinmultiplesclerosiscare