Cargando…

Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)

OBJECTIVES: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are markers of diet quality and high UPF consumption is associated with chronic disease risk. Methods to accurately categorize the degree of food processing are missing from dietary analysis programs. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of assig...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sneed, Nadia Markie, Ukwuani, Somto, Sommer, Evan, Samuels, Lauren, Truesdale, Kimberly, Matheson, Donna, Noerper, Tracy, Barkin, Shari, Heerman, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194338/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac063.020
_version_ 1784726701869105152
author Sneed, Nadia Markie
Ukwuani, Somto
Sommer, Evan
Samuels, Lauren
Truesdale, Kimberly
Matheson, Donna
Noerper, Tracy
Barkin, Shari
Heerman, William
author_facet Sneed, Nadia Markie
Ukwuani, Somto
Sommer, Evan
Samuels, Lauren
Truesdale, Kimberly
Matheson, Donna
Noerper, Tracy
Barkin, Shari
Heerman, William
author_sort Sneed, Nadia Markie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are markers of diet quality and high UPF consumption is associated with chronic disease risk. Methods to accurately categorize the degree of food processing are missing from dietary analysis programs. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of assigning the NOVA classification for UPFs to individual foods collected via 24-hour diet recalls. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 24-hour dietary recalls was conducted from a randomized controlled trial designed to prevent childhood obesity among low-income and minority children. Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R) software was used to collect 2 to 3 dietary recalls from caregivers of 610 children 3–5 years old annually over 4 years. Trained and certified coder pairs independently categorized foods into one of four NOVA classifications (minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed, and ultra-processed). The study team adjudicated any coding discrepancies. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by percent concordance between coder pairs and by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing macronutrient estimates across NOVA classifications. RESULTS: In 5,546 valid days of 24-hour diet recalls from 610 children, there were 3,100 unique foods in the dataset, one of which was not possible to categorize. NOVA classifications for the 3,099 remaining foods were unprocessed/minimally processed (18%); processed culinary ingredients (0.4%); processed (15%); and ultra-processed (67%). Coder concordance was 88.3% with a kappa coefficient of 0.75 (P < .0001). Descriptive comparisons of macronutrient content were consistent with expectations. On average, over the 5,546 daily recalls, UPFs made up 62% (SD 19) of the day's calories, but a higher percentage of the day's added sugar (94%; SD 16) and a lower percentage of the day's protein (47%; SD 24). Minimally processed foods made up 30% (SD 17) of the day's calories, but a lower percentage of the day's added sugar (1%; SD 8) and a higher percentage of the day's protein (43%; SD 24). CONCLUSIONS: This method of applying the NOVA classification to 24-hour dietary recalls using NDS-R software had high inter-rater reliability and good construct validity for identifying individual dietary intake patterns of UPFs. FUNDING SOURCES: NIH, AHRQ.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194338
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91943382022-06-15 Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R) Sneed, Nadia Markie Ukwuani, Somto Sommer, Evan Samuels, Lauren Truesdale, Kimberly Matheson, Donna Noerper, Tracy Barkin, Shari Heerman, William Curr Dev Nutr Methods OBJECTIVES: Ultra-processed foods (UPFs) are markers of diet quality and high UPF consumption is associated with chronic disease risk. Methods to accurately categorize the degree of food processing are missing from dietary analysis programs. This study evaluated the reliability and validity of assigning the NOVA classification for UPFs to individual foods collected via 24-hour diet recalls. METHODS: A secondary analysis of 24-hour dietary recalls was conducted from a randomized controlled trial designed to prevent childhood obesity among low-income and minority children. Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R) software was used to collect 2 to 3 dietary recalls from caregivers of 610 children 3–5 years old annually over 4 years. Trained and certified coder pairs independently categorized foods into one of four NOVA classifications (minimally processed, processed culinary ingredients, processed, and ultra-processed). The study team adjudicated any coding discrepancies. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by percent concordance between coder pairs and by Cohen's kappa coefficient. Construct validity was evaluated by comparing macronutrient estimates across NOVA classifications. RESULTS: In 5,546 valid days of 24-hour diet recalls from 610 children, there were 3,100 unique foods in the dataset, one of which was not possible to categorize. NOVA classifications for the 3,099 remaining foods were unprocessed/minimally processed (18%); processed culinary ingredients (0.4%); processed (15%); and ultra-processed (67%). Coder concordance was 88.3% with a kappa coefficient of 0.75 (P < .0001). Descriptive comparisons of macronutrient content were consistent with expectations. On average, over the 5,546 daily recalls, UPFs made up 62% (SD 19) of the day's calories, but a higher percentage of the day's added sugar (94%; SD 16) and a lower percentage of the day's protein (47%; SD 24). Minimally processed foods made up 30% (SD 17) of the day's calories, but a lower percentage of the day's added sugar (1%; SD 8) and a higher percentage of the day's protein (43%; SD 24). CONCLUSIONS: This method of applying the NOVA classification to 24-hour dietary recalls using NDS-R software had high inter-rater reliability and good construct validity for identifying individual dietary intake patterns of UPFs. FUNDING SOURCES: NIH, AHRQ. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194338/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac063.020 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Methods
Sneed, Nadia Markie
Ukwuani, Somto
Sommer, Evan
Samuels, Lauren
Truesdale, Kimberly
Matheson, Donna
Noerper, Tracy
Barkin, Shari
Heerman, William
Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title_full Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title_short Reliability and Validity of Assigning Ultra-Processed Food Categories to 24-Hour Dietary Recall Data Collected Using the Nutrition Data System for Research (NDS-R)
title_sort reliability and validity of assigning ultra-processed food categories to 24-hour dietary recall data collected using the nutrition data system for research (nds-r)
topic Methods
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194338/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac063.020
work_keys_str_mv AT sneednadiamarkie reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT ukwuanisomto reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT sommerevan reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT samuelslauren reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT truesdalekimberly reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT mathesondonna reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT noerpertracy reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT barkinshari reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr
AT heermanwilliam reliabilityandvalidityofassigningultraprocessedfoodcategoriesto24hourdietaryrecalldatacollectedusingthenutritiondatasystemforresearchndsr