Cargando…

A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome

OBJECTIVES: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is characterized by potentially fatal electrolyte shifts after resumption of feeding following a period of prolonged starvation. The lack of a standardized definition has made the study of RFS difficult. Early identification of patients at risk of RFS may prevent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Solberg, Natalie, Yuan, Haoxuan, Varghese, Abel, Tarar, Kanza, LaForest, Marian, Seres, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194354/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac062.022
_version_ 1784726705951211520
author Solberg, Natalie
Yuan, Haoxuan
Varghese, Abel
Tarar, Kanza
LaForest, Marian
Seres, David
author_facet Solberg, Natalie
Yuan, Haoxuan
Varghese, Abel
Tarar, Kanza
LaForest, Marian
Seres, David
author_sort Solberg, Natalie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is characterized by potentially fatal electrolyte shifts after resumption of feeding following a period of prolonged starvation. The lack of a standardized definition has made the study of RFS difficult. Early identification of patients at risk of RFS may prevent life-threatening complications and improve outcomes. However, the sensitivity of reported risk factors depends on the definition used, and many have never been validated. This study was designed to identify risks for RFS that have been identified in prior studies. It is preparatory for a larger analysis to better identify sensitive and specific risk factors for RFS. METHODS: This is a qualitative systematic review of observational studies following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the incidence of RFS were included. Risk factors were extracted whether identified in review or as a measured exposure. Risk factors were considered distinct if they were not described similarly (e.g., BMI, admit BMI, nadir BMI, BMI < 16, BMI < 18.5 were each treated as distinct). RESULTS: Risk factors were reviewed or studied in 43 of 49 studies that met inclusion criteria. A total of 129 distinct risk factor definitions were extracted. Of these, only 29 used definitions similar enough to other studies to be considered the same by the reviewers (range 2 to 8 studies per risk factor; median 3 studies). NICE guidelines were mentioned in 3 studies. No other published guidelines were found. CONCLUSIONS: Creating a risk profile for patients may help tailor interventions to prevent RFS. There was a large heterogeneous number of risk factors and numerous discrepancies in description of risk factors among the studies. The low incidence of inclusion of poor intake (i.e., less than 100%) in the identified studies was of interest. Next steps will include prospective validation of identified risks, as well as AI analyses to identify and validate other risk factors and biomarkers, with the goal to develop sensitive and specific risk assessments, and effective preventive and treatment protocols. FUNDING SOURCES: None.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91943542022-06-15 A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome Solberg, Natalie Yuan, Haoxuan Varghese, Abel Tarar, Kanza LaForest, Marian Seres, David Curr Dev Nutr Medical Nutrition/Case Study Vignettes OBJECTIVES: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) is characterized by potentially fatal electrolyte shifts after resumption of feeding following a period of prolonged starvation. The lack of a standardized definition has made the study of RFS difficult. Early identification of patients at risk of RFS may prevent life-threatening complications and improve outcomes. However, the sensitivity of reported risk factors depends on the definition used, and many have never been validated. This study was designed to identify risks for RFS that have been identified in prior studies. It is preparatory for a larger analysis to better identify sensitive and specific risk factors for RFS. METHODS: This is a qualitative systematic review of observational studies following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies reporting the incidence of RFS were included. Risk factors were extracted whether identified in review or as a measured exposure. Risk factors were considered distinct if they were not described similarly (e.g., BMI, admit BMI, nadir BMI, BMI < 16, BMI < 18.5 were each treated as distinct). RESULTS: Risk factors were reviewed or studied in 43 of 49 studies that met inclusion criteria. A total of 129 distinct risk factor definitions were extracted. Of these, only 29 used definitions similar enough to other studies to be considered the same by the reviewers (range 2 to 8 studies per risk factor; median 3 studies). NICE guidelines were mentioned in 3 studies. No other published guidelines were found. CONCLUSIONS: Creating a risk profile for patients may help tailor interventions to prevent RFS. There was a large heterogeneous number of risk factors and numerous discrepancies in description of risk factors among the studies. The low incidence of inclusion of poor intake (i.e., less than 100%) in the identified studies was of interest. Next steps will include prospective validation of identified risks, as well as AI analyses to identify and validate other risk factors and biomarkers, with the goal to develop sensitive and specific risk assessments, and effective preventive and treatment protocols. FUNDING SOURCES: None. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194354/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac062.022 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Medical Nutrition/Case Study Vignettes
Solberg, Natalie
Yuan, Haoxuan
Varghese, Abel
Tarar, Kanza
LaForest, Marian
Seres, David
A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title_full A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title_fullStr A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title_full_unstemmed A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title_short A Qualitative Systematic Review of Risk Factors for Refeeding Syndrome
title_sort qualitative systematic review of risk factors for refeeding syndrome
topic Medical Nutrition/Case Study Vignettes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194354/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac062.022
work_keys_str_mv AT solbergnatalie aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT yuanhaoxuan aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT vargheseabel aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT tararkanza aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT laforestmarian aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT seresdavid aqualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT solbergnatalie qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT yuanhaoxuan qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT vargheseabel qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT tararkanza qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT laforestmarian qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome
AT seresdavid qualitativesystematicreviewofriskfactorsforrefeedingsyndrome