Cargando…

Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months

OBJECTIVES: Explore how feeding method is related to distribution of fat and fat free mass in infants at 6 months of age. METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of an RCT assessing prenatal DHA supplementation on infant growth. At 6 months of age, DXA measured infant body composition and distrib...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Herman, Amy, Hull, Holly, Sullivan, Debra, de Santiago, Laura Castro, Horton, Sarah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194425/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac061.045
_version_ 1784726724264591360
author Herman, Amy
Hull, Holly
Sullivan, Debra
de Santiago, Laura Castro
Horton, Sarah
author_facet Herman, Amy
Hull, Holly
Sullivan, Debra
de Santiago, Laura Castro
Horton, Sarah
author_sort Herman, Amy
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Explore how feeding method is related to distribution of fat and fat free mass in infants at 6 months of age. METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of an RCT assessing prenatal DHA supplementation on infant growth. At 6 months of age, DXA measured infant body composition and distribution. Total body less head (TBLH) was used. Feeding method was collected by questionnaire. Infants were split into groups of breastfeeding (BF; n = 56), combo (C; n = 14), or formula feeding (F; n = 44). A 24-hour dietary recall was performed and NDSR was used to determine nutrient totals. Nutrients in breastmilk were homogenously estimated using the human milk option in NDSR, and a standard intake volume was assumed for those feeding directly from the breast. One-way ANOVA determined differences between the groups. RESULTS: BF infants consumed the lowest calories (BF: 557 ± 108; C: 785 ± 173; F: 753 ± 169; P < 0.01) and weighed less than F fed infants (7.73kg ± 0.87 vs 8.06kg ± 1.10 respectively; P < 0.05). However, BF infants consumed the highest percentage of calories from fat at 51.8% ± 3.7 (compared to C: 47.2% ± 4.7; F: 46.3% ± 3.8; P < 0.01) and had higher percentage body fat (%fat; BF: 38.5% ± 4.7 C: 32.8% ± 4.3; F: 35.9% ± 3.4) and central %fat (BF: 27.3% ± 4.8; C: 23.3% ± 4.3; F: 24.0% ± 3.9; all pairwise P < 0.01). BF infants had 0.14kg higher central and 0.32kg higher peripheral fat mass than combo (P < 0.05) but not formula feeders, although central fat mass between BF and F approached significance (mean difference 0.07kg; p = 0.054). Central fat-free mass was different between the BF and F groups only, with BF having 0.22kg lower fat-free mass (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in peripheral fat-free mass. CONCLUSIONS: Feeding method at 6 months of age is related to body composition and distribution. Although breastfeeding infants weighed less and consumed less calories, they had higher total and central %fat. FUNDING SOURCES: This project was supported by an NIH NIDDK R01 grant.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194425
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91944252022-06-15 Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months Herman, Amy Hull, Holly Sullivan, Debra de Santiago, Laura Castro Horton, Sarah Curr Dev Nutr Maternal, Perinatal and Pediatric Nutrition OBJECTIVES: Explore how feeding method is related to distribution of fat and fat free mass in infants at 6 months of age. METHODS: This is a secondary data analysis of an RCT assessing prenatal DHA supplementation on infant growth. At 6 months of age, DXA measured infant body composition and distribution. Total body less head (TBLH) was used. Feeding method was collected by questionnaire. Infants were split into groups of breastfeeding (BF; n = 56), combo (C; n = 14), or formula feeding (F; n = 44). A 24-hour dietary recall was performed and NDSR was used to determine nutrient totals. Nutrients in breastmilk were homogenously estimated using the human milk option in NDSR, and a standard intake volume was assumed for those feeding directly from the breast. One-way ANOVA determined differences between the groups. RESULTS: BF infants consumed the lowest calories (BF: 557 ± 108; C: 785 ± 173; F: 753 ± 169; P < 0.01) and weighed less than F fed infants (7.73kg ± 0.87 vs 8.06kg ± 1.10 respectively; P < 0.05). However, BF infants consumed the highest percentage of calories from fat at 51.8% ± 3.7 (compared to C: 47.2% ± 4.7; F: 46.3% ± 3.8; P < 0.01) and had higher percentage body fat (%fat; BF: 38.5% ± 4.7 C: 32.8% ± 4.3; F: 35.9% ± 3.4) and central %fat (BF: 27.3% ± 4.8; C: 23.3% ± 4.3; F: 24.0% ± 3.9; all pairwise P < 0.01). BF infants had 0.14kg higher central and 0.32kg higher peripheral fat mass than combo (P < 0.05) but not formula feeders, although central fat mass between BF and F approached significance (mean difference 0.07kg; p = 0.054). Central fat-free mass was different between the BF and F groups only, with BF having 0.22kg lower fat-free mass (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the groups in peripheral fat-free mass. CONCLUSIONS: Feeding method at 6 months of age is related to body composition and distribution. Although breastfeeding infants weighed less and consumed less calories, they had higher total and central %fat. FUNDING SOURCES: This project was supported by an NIH NIDDK R01 grant. Oxford University Press 2022-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194425/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac061.045 Text en © The Author 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The International Society for Human and Animal Mycology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Maternal, Perinatal and Pediatric Nutrition
Herman, Amy
Hull, Holly
Sullivan, Debra
de Santiago, Laura Castro
Horton, Sarah
Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title_full Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title_fullStr Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title_full_unstemmed Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title_short Infant Feeding Method and Body Composition Differences at 6 Months
title_sort infant feeding method and body composition differences at 6 months
topic Maternal, Perinatal and Pediatric Nutrition
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194425/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cdn/nzac061.045
work_keys_str_mv AT hermanamy infantfeedingmethodandbodycompositiondifferencesat6months
AT hullholly infantfeedingmethodandbodycompositiondifferencesat6months
AT sullivandebra infantfeedingmethodandbodycompositiondifferencesat6months
AT desantiagolauracastro infantfeedingmethodandbodycompositiondifferencesat6months
AT hortonsarah infantfeedingmethodandbodycompositiondifferencesat6months