Cargando…
Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584 |
_version_ | 1784726866266947584 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Honglai Wang, Lin Riegel, Adam C. Antone, Jeffrey Potters, Louis Lee, Lucille Cao, Yijian |
author_facet | Zhang, Honglai Wang, Lin Riegel, Adam C. Antone, Jeffrey Potters, Louis Lee, Lucille Cao, Yijian |
author_sort | Zhang, Honglai |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patients receiving no spacer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient was treated to doses of 45 Gy to the primary tumor site and nodal regions over 25 fractions using VMAT and 100 Gy to the prostate using prostate seed implant (PSI). In VMAT plans of patients with no spacer, mean doses of rectal wall were 43.6, 42.4, 40.1, and 28.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively. In patients with SpaceOAR, average rectal wall doses decreased to 39.0, 36.9, 33.5, and 23.9 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively (p < 0.01). In PSI plans, rectal wall doses were on average 78.5, 60.9, 41.8, and 14.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patients without spacer. In contrast, the doses decreased to 34.5, 28.4, 20.6 (p < 0.01), and 8.5 Gy (p < 0.05) to rectal wall volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patient with SpaceOAR. To demonstrate rectal sum dose sparing, dose‐biological effective dose (BED) calculation was accomplished in those patients who showed >60% overlap of rectal volumetric doses between VMAT and PSI. In patients with SpaceOAR, average BED(sum) was decreased up to 34%, which was 90.1, 78.9, 65.9, and 40.8 Gy to rectal volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in comparison to 137.4, 116.7, 93.0, and 50.2 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in those with no spacer. Our result suggested a significant reduction of rectal doses in those patients who underwent a combination of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer placement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-9194986 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-91949862022-06-21 Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion Zhang, Honglai Wang, Lin Riegel, Adam C. Antone, Jeffrey Potters, Louis Lee, Lucille Cao, Yijian J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patients receiving no spacer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient was treated to doses of 45 Gy to the primary tumor site and nodal regions over 25 fractions using VMAT and 100 Gy to the prostate using prostate seed implant (PSI). In VMAT plans of patients with no spacer, mean doses of rectal wall were 43.6, 42.4, 40.1, and 28.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively. In patients with SpaceOAR, average rectal wall doses decreased to 39.0, 36.9, 33.5, and 23.9 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively (p < 0.01). In PSI plans, rectal wall doses were on average 78.5, 60.9, 41.8, and 14.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patients without spacer. In contrast, the doses decreased to 34.5, 28.4, 20.6 (p < 0.01), and 8.5 Gy (p < 0.05) to rectal wall volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patient with SpaceOAR. To demonstrate rectal sum dose sparing, dose‐biological effective dose (BED) calculation was accomplished in those patients who showed >60% overlap of rectal volumetric doses between VMAT and PSI. In patients with SpaceOAR, average BED(sum) was decreased up to 34%, which was 90.1, 78.9, 65.9, and 40.8 Gy to rectal volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in comparison to 137.4, 116.7, 93.0, and 50.2 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in those with no spacer. Our result suggested a significant reduction of rectal doses in those patients who underwent a combination of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer placement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194986/ /pubmed/35285578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Radiation Oncology Physics Zhang, Honglai Wang, Lin Riegel, Adam C. Antone, Jeffrey Potters, Louis Lee, Lucille Cao, Yijian Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title | Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title_full | Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title_fullStr | Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title_full_unstemmed | Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title_short | Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion |
title_sort | biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of vmat and ldr with hydrogel spacer insertion |
topic | Radiation Oncology Physics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194986/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghonglai biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT wanglin biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT riegeladamc biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT antonejeffrey biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT potterslouis biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT leelucille biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion AT caoyijian biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion |