Cargando…

Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion

This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Honglai, Wang, Lin, Riegel, Adam C., Antone, Jeffrey, Potters, Louis, Lee, Lucille, Cao, Yijian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584
_version_ 1784726866266947584
author Zhang, Honglai
Wang, Lin
Riegel, Adam C.
Antone, Jeffrey
Potters, Louis
Lee, Lucille
Cao, Yijian
author_facet Zhang, Honglai
Wang, Lin
Riegel, Adam C.
Antone, Jeffrey
Potters, Louis
Lee, Lucille
Cao, Yijian
author_sort Zhang, Honglai
collection PubMed
description This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patients receiving no spacer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient was treated to doses of 45 Gy to the primary tumor site and nodal regions over 25 fractions using VMAT and 100 Gy to the prostate using prostate seed implant (PSI). In VMAT plans of patients with no spacer, mean doses of rectal wall were 43.6, 42.4, 40.1, and 28.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively. In patients with SpaceOAR, average rectal wall doses decreased to 39.0, 36.9, 33.5, and 23.9 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively (p < 0.01). In PSI plans, rectal wall doses were on average 78.5, 60.9, 41.8, and 14.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patients without spacer. In contrast, the doses decreased to 34.5, 28.4, 20.6 (p < 0.01), and 8.5 Gy (p < 0.05) to rectal wall volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patient with SpaceOAR. To demonstrate rectal sum dose sparing, dose‐biological effective dose (BED) calculation was accomplished in those patients who showed >60% overlap of rectal volumetric doses between VMAT and PSI. In patients with SpaceOAR, average BED(sum) was decreased up to 34%, which was 90.1, 78.9, 65.9, and 40.8 Gy to rectal volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in comparison to 137.4, 116.7, 93.0, and 50.2 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in those with no spacer. Our result suggested a significant reduction of rectal doses in those patients who underwent a combination of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer placement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-9194986
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-91949862022-06-21 Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion Zhang, Honglai Wang, Lin Riegel, Adam C. Antone, Jeffrey Potters, Louis Lee, Lucille Cao, Yijian J Appl Clin Med Phys Radiation Oncology Physics This study aimed to evaluate rectal dose reduction in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and low‐dose‐rate (LDR) brachytherapy with insertion of hydrogel spacer (SpaceOAR). For this study, 35 patients receiving hydrogel spacer and 30 patients receiving no spacer were retrospectively enrolled. Patient was treated to doses of 45 Gy to the primary tumor site and nodal regions over 25 fractions using VMAT and 100 Gy to the prostate using prostate seed implant (PSI). In VMAT plans of patients with no spacer, mean doses of rectal wall were 43.6, 42.4, 40.1, and 28.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively. In patients with SpaceOAR, average rectal wall doses decreased to 39.0, 36.9, 33.5, and 23.9 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively (p < 0.01). In PSI plans, rectal wall doses were on average 78.5, 60.9, 41.8, and 14.8 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patients without spacer. In contrast, the doses decreased to 34.5, 28.4, 20.6 (p < 0.01), and 8.5 Gy (p < 0.05) to rectal wall volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in patient with SpaceOAR. To demonstrate rectal sum dose sparing, dose‐biological effective dose (BED) calculation was accomplished in those patients who showed >60% overlap of rectal volumetric doses between VMAT and PSI. In patients with SpaceOAR, average BED(sum) was decreased up to 34%, which was 90.1, 78.9, 65.9, and 40.8 Gy to rectal volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in comparison to 137.4, 116.7, 93.0, and 50.2 Gy to the volume of 0.5, 1, 2, and 5 cm(3), respectively, in those with no spacer. Our result suggested a significant reduction of rectal doses in those patients who underwent a combination of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer placement. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2022-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC9194986/ /pubmed/35285578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584 Text en © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Radiation Oncology Physics
Zhang, Honglai
Wang, Lin
Riegel, Adam C.
Antone, Jeffrey
Potters, Louis
Lee, Lucille
Cao, Yijian
Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title_full Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title_fullStr Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title_full_unstemmed Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title_short Biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of VMAT and LDR with hydrogel spacer insertion
title_sort biological effective dose in analysis of rectal dose in prostate cancer patients who underwent a combination therapy of vmat and ldr with hydrogel spacer insertion
topic Radiation Oncology Physics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9194986/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35285578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acm2.13584
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghonglai biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT wanglin biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT riegeladamc biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT antonejeffrey biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT potterslouis biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT leelucille biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion
AT caoyijian biologicaleffectivedoseinanalysisofrectaldoseinprostatecancerpatientswhounderwentacombinationtherapyofvmatandldrwithhydrogelspacerinsertion